CodeScan Static Code Analysis vs SonarQube comparison

AutoRABIT and SonarSource Sàrl are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. AutoRABIT is ranked #38, while SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. AutoRABIT holds a 0.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to SonarSource Sàrl’s 18.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution.

CodeScan Static Code Analysis

474 Views
441 Comparison Views

SonarQube

Read 134 SonarQube reviews

38,374 Views
28,013 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CodeScan Static Code Analysis

SonarQube

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

SonarQube and CodeScan compete in the static code analysis market. SonarQube generally leads in terms of pricing and customer support, while CodeScan offers valuable features specific to Salesforce development.

Features: SonarQube provides continuous inspection capabilities, supports multiple programming languages, and integrates widely. CodeScan, aimed at Salesforce development, offers robust Apex analysis, efficient Lightning analysis, and a focus on Salesforce environments, serving well those who depend on Salesforce platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers easy deployment with strong community support and extensive documentation, which suits self-driven solutions. On the other hand, CodeScan provides tailored assistance for Salesforce environments with specialized support, ensuring smooth integration where Salesforce is key.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube is accessible with competitive pricing, catering to organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with balanced features. Despite CodeScan's higher cost, it offers better ROI for Salesforce-specific applications due to deep integration. SonarQube may be more economical for broader applications, while CodeScan offers enhanced returns for Salesforce-centric development.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

38th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

134

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of CodeScan Static Code Analysis is 0.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube is 18.2%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube	18.2%
CodeScan Static Code Analysis	0.6%
Other	81.2%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Use CodeScan Static Code Analysis?

Leave a review

KarthikHarpanhalli

Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical

Gains control over rule customization and achieves reliable vulnerability assessment

The deployment process took me about 2 or 3 hours to deploy SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), although I do not remember exactly since it was done about 2 years back. Currently, about 10 of my developers are using SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in my company. I do not have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the future as there will not be any requirement to increase. I am a senior software engineer and supervisor at Mozark Medical. My corporate email address is karthik.k.a.r.t.h.i.k.h.a.r.p.a.n.h.a.l.l.i@mozarkmedical.com. Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

22%

Outsourcing Company

21%

Energy/Utilities Company

19%

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

SISA vs CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Compared 20% of the time

Seeker Interactive vs CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Compared 15% of the time

Checkmarx One vs CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Compared 13% of the time

NowSecure vs CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs CodeScan Static Code Analysis

Compared 10% of the time

More CodeScan Static Code Analysis Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 28% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 5% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download CodeScan Static Code Analysis product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

January 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

AutoRABIT

SonarSource Sàrl

Overview

CodeScan Static Code Analysis is a powerful tool designed to improve software development processes, enhance code quality, detect vulnerabilities and bugs, and ensure compliance with coding standards.

With accurate bug detection, efficient performance, helpful code suggestions, and reliable security checks, it is a valuable asset for reducing technical debt and maintaining consistent code quality.

The seamless integration with various IDEs and comprehensive reporting capabilities make it a must-have for any development team.

AutoRABIT

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. VMware 10. Amazon Web Services 11. Facebook 12. LinkedIn 13. Netflix 14. Spotify 15. Tesla 16. Uber 17. Airbnb 18. Dropbox 19. Square 20. Snapchat 21. Pinterest 22. Yelp 23. Mozilla 24. Mozilla Foundation 25. Red Hat 26. Canonical 27. SUSE 28. CentOS 29. Fedora 30. Ubuntu

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.