CodeTwo Exchange Rules vs Microsoft Exchange Online comparison

"The solution offers great features."

"I enjoy not having to maintain the local infrastructure, local servers, local whatever. You use the software and don't have to worry about the details."

"The most valuable feature is being able to assign an individual a task."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is an easy-to-use solution."

"The solution is quite convenient because you can access the web version anywhere."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is easy to use. You have a common storage where people can store documents. It also helps with version control."

"A good investment."

"Its most valuable feature is the unlimited storage. It also has very little downtime."

"It helps us manage the email focus from our side."

"NVMe support is lacking when it comes to performance on the disk side."

"What I don't like about Microsoft Exchange Online is too much integration because now it has many services connected to it. In the beginning, it was just email, and now it's also Teams and Visio, and many other services which I don't like. Microsoft Exchange Online should focus on one service. The product now lost focus, and this is its area for improvement. I would also like more freedom in choosing to use just one service, for example, just Microsoft Exchange Online, which means I don't need Teams or any other Microsoft product or service there. Right now, all services are either in the Microsoft Office suite, or there are more products or services integrated with Microsoft Exchange Online, and I'd like to just focus on one."

"I have found that Microsoft has vulnerabilities when it comes to Exchange Online. It has become the port of a lot of hacker attacks."

"Improving the methods for inputting email signatures could be beneficial for the product."

"We would like to have more automation with Microsoft Exchange Online."

"The product needs to embed AI for intelligent searches and analytics."

"When initially setting up, it took a bit of time because we had a lot of PST files with the users, and we had to migrate them batch by batch."

"The support could improve their response time and sometimes the phone lines are not clear because of static or noise. However, the agents are knowledgeable and very helpful."

"The SaaS platform performance could be improved. At a previous company, we used this same solution on-premises. The data exchange was much faster compared to the SaaS platform and we sometimes experience lags."

"I would give the cost a five out of ten."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements."

"I would say the solution is reasonable and affordable."

"I have no opinion."

"I find it reasonably priced."

"I think that the price is a little high, especially considering that Google have a similar, free email solution."

"Our organization pays for a corporate license to use the solution."