No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Contrast Security Assess vs Mend.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Contrast Security Assess enhances security, reduces costs, improves code quality, and speeds up remediation with continuous scanning and automated triaging.
Sentiment score
6.5
Mend.io boosts productivity and security by reducing vulnerability management time, improving code quality, and integrating seamlessly with workflows.
Contrast has probably saved us a couple hundred hours over the past six years.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
In the past, my company employed five security engineers, but with Contrast Security Assess, we only have two people.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The speed of fixing issues is significantly improved due to the vast amount of information provided by Contrast Security Assess, making it quite essential for finding the root cause of problems in the source code.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.4
Contrast Security Assess is praised for responsive and knowledgeable support, though some suggest improved response times for ticket management.
Sentiment score
6.8
Mend.io's support is rated highly for responsiveness and expertise, though some users note delays and confusion with partners.
They go out of their way to respond quickly and very knowledgeably.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Customer support is one of the strongest points of Contrast Security Assess, as they are really responsive and answer tickets in less than one hour.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Contrast Security's customer support is very active and overall incredible.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Critical tickets are responded to within an hour.
Product Security Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I have noticed that the speed to respond has decreased over time.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Contrast Security Assess excels in scalability and flexibility, though integration and automation enhancements could boost deployment efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Mend.io scales efficiently, seamlessly integrating with tools and supporting large loads, offering adaptability globally despite minor challenges.
It is fairly simple to install the agents for Contrast Security Assess and keep them updated.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Contrast Security Assess's scalability is not an issue at all.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Regarding scalability, I would also rate it a ten because in some cases, I have 500 projects inside a single product, so I think it is quite scalable.
Product Security Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Contrast Security Assess offers high stability, efficient traffic handling, minimal maintenance, and enhanced accuracy with few environment-specific issues.
Sentiment score
7.8
Mend.io is reliable, with minimal downtime, seamless integration, broad use case support, and optimal browser compatibility, enhancing development processes.
Contrast Security Assess is genuinely more accurate than most tools I have worked with because it uses instrumentation from inside the application.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We opened a ticket to customer support and experienced four weeks of disruption due to the extension malfunctioning in some of the .NET servers running Contrast Security Assess.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Mend.io is very stable; we did not have any issues.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Contrast Security Assess needs better documentation, technology support, integration, reporting, and pricing to enhance usability for larger organizations.
Mend.io users want improved notifications, onboarding, dashboard, customization, integrations, language support, AI features, and enhanced security and documentation.
Regarding Contrast Security Assess's AI capabilities, I think they are missing a huge opportunity because they could lead the way in automatic testing and AI security testing.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would love to see more customizable, out-of-the-box reporting that speaks to both technical and non-technical people without extra configuration.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
That's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
Principal Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I strongly recommend that they start working with AI for the reporting part.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Contrast Security Assess offers flexible tiered licensing per application, ranging from $20,000 to $100,000 annually, enhancing cost management.
Mend.io provides flexible, scalable enterprise pricing with fixed costs, though some seek alternatives due to potential rising expenses.
The annual licensing for Contrast Security Assess costs about $20,000 to $100,000 per year, and per application, it costs about $5,000 to $15,000 per year.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and SAST tools, but it seems to be worth the money.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Contrast Security Assess enhances security with accurate vulnerability detection, CI/CD integration, automation, and developer support, improving development efficiency.
Mend.io offers comprehensive open source dependency management, seamless integration, and automation, enhancing security and efficiency in CI/CD pipelines.
The real-time detection feature of Contrast Security Assess helps us very well compared to traditional SAST tools. Traditional tools scan from the outside and guess where problems might be. Contrast Security Assess works from the inside because it is embedded into the application.
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The ability to see what is going on and what has been going on in a given application and basically get to see what is coming across it in real time is helpful in finding vulnerabilities to remediate before production deployments.
Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Instead of fixing each vulnerability reported independently, you can group them and fix them in a single point in the source code, resolving several vulnerabilities at once.
Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It handles Application Security, performing SCA SAST and container scanning.
Principal Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The features I find most valuable in Mend.io are the ease of use; it is very easy to access and integrate.
VP at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess
Ranking in Application Security Tools
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (21st)
Mend.io
Ranking in Application Security Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Static Code Analysis (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 2.5%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Mend.io2.5%
Contrast Security Assess1.7%
Other95.8%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Eucharia Okafor - PeerSpot reviewer
Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Continuous in-app security has transformed our development workflow and has reduced manual checks
Contrast Security Assess changes how the team thinks about security. Instead of us waiting for a security audit at the end of any sprint, vulnerabilities surface as developers are writing and testing code. That shift is significant because fixing a bug in development costs more than fixing it later. It captures everything right there and remediates it because it catches vulnerability and remediates immediately while the application is running. It improves our collaboration between development and security teams, as developers get clear actionable findings immediately. We get continuous visibility into our application risk posture. Ultimately, it helps us to shift fast and save money, which is usually a trade-off, but Contrast Security Assess makes both possible. The feature that stands out most to me in Contrast Security Assess is the ability to capture vulnerability while the application is running. Another standout feature is the real-time detection that finds vulnerabilities as code runs. It has fewer false positives and works continuously in the application; you install it and it is there. It captures issues during development quickly and is easily integrated with a CI/CD pipeline, especially if you are using GitLab or GitHub. The real-time detection feature of Contrast Security Assess helps us very well compared to traditional SAST tools. Traditional tools scan from the outside and guess where problems might be. Contrast Security Assess works from the inside because it is embedded into the application. The agent lives inside the running application, allowing it to see exactly what is happening in real-time. This means we are getting accurate alerts instead of a long list of potential issues that require manual investigation. When it comes to the CI/CD pipeline, Contrast Security Assess really shines for our daily work, as it plugs directly into tools like Jenkins, GitHub, or Azure DevOps. When a developer commits code and triggers a build, Contrast Security Assess is already testing it in the background. If there is any vulnerability, the pipeline automatically flags or stops the application before bad code reaches production. This means security becomes everyone's responsibility, not just the security team's, and it gives us real-time, accurate security that fits into how our team already works.
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized security monitoring has reduced false positives and improves dependency governance
The only area for improvement I would say is that the false positives are nearly zero; everything is mostly like 99 to 99.99% or we can say 100% accurate. There were a few areas for improvement just from the last time I saw; I think the user experience had a little problem. We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports. We had asked for some facility and some ability for us to create some custom reports. That would be awesome if they allow us to create custom reports the way we wanted. There is one small area which I don't know whether we should call a tool limitation or a wish list; if I use a library and I don't use all the capabilities of the library but only a portion of it and that portion is not vulnerable, but there is a component which is outdated, that is a problem, even though I don't use that component. Mend.io will discover there is a problem in the whole library; that is correct. That's a valid discovery, but in my case, for example, if I don't use that particular portion, then it actually is not making sense for me, but that's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, the annual licensing for Contrast Security Assess costs about $20,000 to $100,000 per year, and per application, it costs about $5,000 to $15,000 per y...
What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?
Contrast Security Assess could improve in the reporting and the dashboard experience. While the data is there, pulling together an executive-level summary requires too much manual work. I would lov...
What advice do you have for others considering Contrast Security Assess?
The biggest production gain from Contrast Security Assess is the reduced costs and overhead within my company. Security feedback comes to developers instantly with Contrast Security Assess, reducin...
How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?
We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mend.io?
Mend.io SCA offers a competitive pricing structure that is relatively affordable compared to similar solutions in the market. This makes it an attractive option for organizations looking to enhance...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Contrast Assess
WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.
Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Assess vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.