

Control-M and Temporal are leading solutions in the field of workflow automation and orchestration. Control-M demonstrates a strong presence in automation for enterprise environments, particularly in sectors like banking, while Temporal stands out in microservices environments with its focus on long-running workflows and distributed transactions. Based on usage and feedback, Temporal is noted for its ability to efficiently manage complex workflows in developer-centric environments.
Features: Control-M is renowned for its robust automation capabilities, especially on AS400 platforms, providing seamless integration for complex scheduling and job management across diverse applications. Its extensive integration capabilities and a user-friendly interface enhance usability in enterprise environments. Temporal excels with features supporting long-running workflows, transparent handling of distributed transactions, and automated retry mechanisms, crucial for resilience in microservices architectures. Temporal's developer-centric design makes it easy to manage and comprehend complex workflow tasks.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could enhance its report flexibility and integration modules, which are essential for analyzing process outputs beyond basic string matching. Additionally, users suggest improvements in built-in reporting tools. Temporal's documentation could be more robust to support community engagement, along with better state visualization and intuitive setup processes that simplify user adaptation. Addressing these areas could enhance the learning curve and support community engagement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers versatile deployment options ranging from on-premises to hybrid cloud, supported by reliable customer service and technical support. Users, however, face challenges with version upgrades and configurations. Temporal provides flexible deployment options, including both on-premises and public cloud environments, and is generally well-regarded for its customer support. Some users report challenges related to documentation and troubleshooting, indicating room for improvement in these areas.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is seen as a premium tool with extensive features, though its complex licensing can be costly for smaller entities. Users find value in potential ROI through enhanced automation efficiencies. Temporal, available as an open-source tool, attracts budget-conscious users with no licensing fees involved. It offers ROI by reducing developer time and infrastructure costs, making it a favorable choice for businesses prioritizing cost-efficiency.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
The ROI is apparent in terms of business case automation; previously, a bunch of people filled in data in NetSuite or managed stocks between warehouses and Amazon, but now everything is automated, saving time.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
The deployment process is quite straightforward as it provides both Kubernetes and Docker Compose versions, allowing us to run it in ECS containers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.7% |
| Temporal | 5.9% |
| Other | 90.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.
Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.
What are Temporal's key features?Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.