


Control-M and UiPath Orchestrator compete in the workflow automation category. Control-M stands out due to its robust integration features and comprehensive file transfer capabilities, while UiPath Orchestrator excels in user-friendly interfaces and flexible scheduling.
Features: Control-M is known for its robust MFT capabilities, diverse integration options, and the Automation API feature promoting DevOps integration. UiPath Orchestrator is praised for its flexible scheduling, streamlined automation processes, and more intuitive GUI design.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve its API support, reporting capabilities, and cloud integration, with concerns about license model complexity and costs for smaller enterprises. UiPath Orchestrator users face challenges in pricing, queue management, and manual intervention during automation failures, with suggestions for simplifying the interface and enhancing AI integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M primarily supports on-premises with hybrid solutions, but experiences with technical support vary. UiPath Orchestrator offers public and private cloud deployment flexibility, with customer support noted for responsiveness, though it could simplify issue resolution and documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is considered costly with a complex licensing model, yet offers significant integration and scheduling benefits for larger companies. UiPath Orchestrator also has a premium price but provides scalability and licensing options that may reduce costs in larger deployments, contributing value through streamlined operations.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
I would say we have seen a 30% return on investment because we had multiple tools in place previously, and now we have stopped using all those tools.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
The impact of UiPath Orchestrator's analytics on the decision-making process is important because it shortens the decision-making time, which helps customers.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Their support teams are not sufficiently qualified to support us in our needs.
It's on the better side, but still has room for improvement in the speed of response.
I can give customer service an eight out of ten, though sometimes I find difficulties and have trouble finding support.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
For scalability, I would rate it as seven because when we have a huge volume, sometimes the tool is not so responsive.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
As the workload grows, it is possible to expand the environment and manage additional processes while still maintaining centralized monitoring and control.
The solution's flexibility in integration and scheduling across different environments suggests good scalability.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Regarding stability, I would give Control-M a ten.
In my experience, once workflows and jobs are properly configured, it runs reliably and handles scheduled processes consistently.
The solution is stable and integrated well with other systems.
We usually install UiPath on-premises, and then we proceed with web application automations, which has been easy.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.
UiPath Orchestrator setup is easy, but the settings could be made easier for other people to understand.
I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My thoughts on the pricing of JAMS are that I won't say it is cheap, but it is cost-efficient, and that should be acceptable.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high.
Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain customers because of this.
It would be beneficial for UiPath to further refine pricing, setup costs, and licensing by making their tool more intuitive and simplifying complex functionalities.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
JAMS helps centralize the management of jobs on all of my platforms and applications, which has helped my organization significantly.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
The centralized nature of UiPath Orchestrator provides a seamless experience for managing automation processes.
Compared to UiPath, there are many packages available to make automation easier, which is why I find UiPath to be the best.
We use UiPath Orchestrator to connect with different applications, extract and analyze data by specific criteria, and send emails.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 13.8% |
| JAMS | 2.8% |
| UiPath Orchestrator | 1.3% |
| Other | 82.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 151 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
Control-M, from BMC, provides robust orchestration capabilities for managing hybrid cloud workflows, available both on-premise and as a SaaS option. Control-M from BMC supports growing teams in automating and scheduling enterprise workload processes. Control-M serves as a versatile tool for businesses, enabling automation across diverse platforms like SAP, mainframes, and cloud environments. It simplifies job scheduling with an intuitive GUI and integrates with multiple applications and platforms. Users benefit from managed file transfers, role-based administration, and self-service portals, enhancing security and workflow management. While the platform offers comprehensive alerting, reporting, and batch impact management, feedback has highlighted areas for improvement such as more flexible job execution, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration with third-party tools. Additionally, licensing costs and support during upgrades are common concerns. Organizations value Control-M for its ability to facilitate secure file transfers and support business-critical operations, minimizing manual intervention and ensuring efficiency.
What are the key features of Control-M?
What benefits should you look for in Control-M reviews?
Control-M is instrumental in industries managing complex workflows and IT operations. In finance, it offers accurate real-time data processing. Supply chain sectors benefit from its orchestration capabilities to streamline operations and minimize disruption. IT departments leverage integration capabilities to optimize workflow processes, ensuring seamless application management.
UiPath Orchestrator offers a centralized platform for managing robotic process automation tasks, featuring advanced scheduling, integration capabilities, and robust monitoring to enhance workflow efficiency across environments.
UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive suite of tools for automating workflows, centralizing data management, and ensuring security compliance. Known for its ease of use, it helps businesses schedule robots, handle reports, and monitor logs centrally. It facilitates task deployment across diverse environments, simplifies document understanding, process automation, and provides insights into bot activities. While installation and complexity are areas for improvement, Orchestrator remains integral in sectors like finance, telecom, and healthcare.
What features does UiPath Orchestrator provide?Organizations leverage UiPath Orchestrator for automating workflows such as website processes and supply chain management. In industries like finance and healthcare, it is used for provisioning and data entry. It provides a framework to configure machines, create templates, and manage resources, driving efficiency and innovation.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.