Top 10 UiPath Orchestrator Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

34 reviews
92% willing to recommend

Top UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and Automic Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

UiPath Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by offering intuitive centralized management, real-time tracking, advanced analytics, and seamless scalability, enabling organizations to efficiently deploy, monitor, and optimize robotic processes with unmatched ease and precision.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M excels with integration, especially with AS400 systems, offering robust cross-platform support ideal for industries like banking. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator simplifies centralized automation management for repetitive tasks, providing an intuitive solution for efficient deployment, especially beneficial in cloud environments.

Download Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Control-M has an initial setup cost that may be higher, offering comprehensive enterprise solutions, whereas UiPath Orchestrator provides a potentially more cost-effective setup suitable for smaller operations. The pricing reflects distinct market positions and feature emphasis.

View comparison

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

4.0 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

4.0 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management with extensive integration capabilities across various technologies. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator simplifies task automation with centralized features, appealing to businesses needing user-friendly RPA. Each solution caters to different organizational needs in integration and automation.

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to UiPath Orchestrator, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to UiPath Orchestrator, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation offers robust integration and scripting capabilities suited for complex infrastructures. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator provides a streamlined user experience with its centralized data management and scheduling, making it ideal for simplified automation across varied environments.

Download Automic Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Automic Automation setup costs are minimal, while UiPath Orchestrator involves higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in cost expectations for their implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Automic Automation setup costs are minimal, while UiPath Orchestrator involves higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in cost expectations for their implementation.

AWS Step Functions

4.1 out of 5

AWS Step Functions

4.1 out of 5

AWS Step Functions excels in scalability and AWS integration, ideal for cloud-native tasks. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator offers comprehensive automation features, appealing to those seeking advanced options and processes, despite higher costs. Each solution suits different organizational goals and deployment needs.

Download AWS Step Functions vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

AWS Step Functions offers a lower setup cost compared to UiPath Orchestrator, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, UiPath Orchestrator may require a higher initial investment but potentially offers more comprehensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

JAMS

4.4 out of 5

JAMS

4.4 out of 5

JAMS excels in flexible job management with competitive pricing and strong ROI. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator offers extensive AI integrations and real-time insights, ideal for those seeking broad ecosystem integration despite higher costs, providing value through advanced features and seamless third-party system compatibility.

Download JAMS vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

JAMS offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while UiPath Orchestrator involves a more complex and potentially expensive setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

JAMS offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while UiPath Orchestrator involves a more complex and potentially expensive setup process.

VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator

4.0 out of 5

UiPath Orchestrator excels in intuitive management and responsive support, making it ideal for cost-sensitive buyers seeking efficient deployment. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator provides comprehensive integration and advanced features, attracting businesses that prioritize extensive automation despite higher costs.

Pricing

UiPath Orchestrator features straightforward setup, while VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator involves a more intricate, time-consuming installation process.

View comparison

Pricing

UiPath Orchestrator features straightforward setup, while VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator involves a more intricate, time-consuming installation process.

Related categories

Workload Automation

Process Automation

Managed File Transfer (MFT)