Top 10 UiPath Orchestrator Alternatives

Name: UiPath Orchestrator
Brand: UiPath
Rating: 4.1 (35 reviews)

Vendor: UiPath

4.1 out of 5

35 reviews
93% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and Automic Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. UiPath Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by offering robust scheduling, asset management, and insightful analytics that streamline automation processes, ensuring efficient orchestration of software robots and maximizing productivity in enterprises.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Control-M

4.3 out of 5

Control-M

4.3 out of 5

Control-M offers extensive automation across complex environments, ideal for banking and enterprise orchestration. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator focuses on RPA with AI features for task automation. Control-M's high price reflects its capabilities, while UiPath offers competitive pricing for robust RPA needs.

Download Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Control-M setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive system features, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more competitive setup cost, focusing on streamlined orchestration for efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Control-M setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive system features, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more competitive setup cost, focusing on streamlined orchestration for efficiency.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

4.0 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

4.0 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in comprehensive API management and integration across environments. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator focuses on task automation and operational efficiency. Tech buyers may favor MuleSoft for integration needs or UiPath for user-friendly automation solutions.

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while UiPath Orchestrator may require a higher initial investment. The pricing difference may impact budget considerations significantly between these two platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation offers robust scripting and extensive integrations, ideal for complex automation. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator emphasizes user-friendly navigation and AI features, suitable for ease of use. Automic provides customization, while UiPath offers simplified task management and integrated support.

Download Automic Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Automic Automation typically involves higher initial setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting a significant cost difference.

View comparison

Pricing

Automic Automation typically involves higher initial setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting a significant cost difference.

AWS Step Functions

4.2 out of 5

AWS Step Functions

4.2 out of 5

AWS Step Functions offers seamless AWS cloud integration and flexibility, appealing to businesses needing cloud-native orchestration. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive RPA-focused suite, attracting organizations prioritizing detailed management of software robots and extensive monitoring capabilities for complex automation workflows.

Download AWS Step Functions vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

AWS Step Functions have predictable setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator incurs higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Step Functions have predictable setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator incurs higher initial expenses.

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform offers no-code workflows and Microsoft integration, appealing to users seeking ease and leveraging SharePoint investments. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator excels in task scheduling and centralized bot management, attractive to those requiring advanced RPA capabilities and large-scale automation control.

Download Nintex Process Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform is noted for straightforward setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator requires a more detailed cost analysis due to its complexity.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform is noted for straightforward setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator requires a more detailed cost analysis due to its complexity.

JAMS

4.4 out of 5

JAMS

4.4 out of 5

JAMS offers robust scheduling with cost-effective automation and PowerShell integration. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator features centralized control, advanced AI, and data management. A tech buyer might choose JAMS for flexible scheduling or UiPath for comprehensive control and centralized management.

Download JAMS vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

JAMS has a lower setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious users, while UiPath Orchestrator's higher setup cost could indicate a more robust feature set but requires a greater investment.

View comparison

Pricing

JAMS has a lower setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious users, while UiPath Orchestrator's higher setup cost could indicate a more robust feature set but requires a greater investment.

Rocket Zena

4.3 out of 5

Rocket Zena

4.3 out of 5

Rocket Zena's customizable automation tools and rapid integration appeal to businesses needing tailored solutions. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator's advanced analytics and centralized control offer a comprehensive solution, justifying its higher cost for those requiring scalability and sophisticated features.

Download Rocket Zena vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Rocket Zena requires a minimal setup cost, whereas UiPath Orchestrator offers a more extensive setup process that reflects in higher initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

Rocket Zena requires a minimal setup cost, whereas UiPath Orchestrator offers a more extensive setup process that reflects in higher initial expenditure.

Dollar Universe Workload Automation

3.3 out of 5

Dollar Universe Workload Automation

3.3 out of 5

Dollar Universe offers robust workload automation with easy integration across environments, appealing to those seeking efficient scheduling. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator provides extensive robotic process automation, with superior customer service justifying its cost for organizations aiming for advanced automation capabilities.

Download Dollar Universe Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

Dollar Universe Workload Automation has a competitive setup cost, while UiPath Orchestrator often requires a larger initial investment, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

3.3 out of 5

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

3.3 out of 5

UiPath Orchestrator offers robust RPA features and detailed job scheduling, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive automation. In comparison, Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow provides scalability and seamless AWS integration, attracting those already invested in the AWS ecosystem for dynamic, complex data workflows.

Download Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report

Pricing

UiPath Orchestrator has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow, which makes UiPath potentially less attractive for budget-conscious users prioritizing affordability in workflow automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Astro by Astronomer

1 out of 5

Astro by Astronomer

1 out of 5

UiPath Orchestrator is ideal for robust process automation with strong scheduling and monitoring. In comparison, Astro by Astronomer excels in scalable data orchestration. UiPath appeals to those seeking detailed RPA, while Astro attracts businesses needing efficient data pipeline management.

Pricing

UiPath Orchestrator's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Astro by Astronomer offers a more economical setup, appealing to users seeking budget-friendly options.

View comparison

Pricing

UiPath Orchestrator's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Astro by Astronomer offers a more economical setup, appealing to users seeking budget-friendly options.

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Workload Automation

Process Automation

Managed File Transfer (MFT)