CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM comparison

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 5 StrongDM reviews

1,645 Views
1,349 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and StrongDM compete in the identity security category. CyberArk is recognized for its comprehensive security features, while StrongDM is noted for its seamless integration and user-friendliness.

Features: CyberArk offers privileged access management, enhanced endpoint security, and comprehensive policy enforcement. StrongDM provides robust infrastructure access, multi-protocol support, and streamlined access controls that prioritize accessibility and simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk's deployment can be time-intensive due to its complex configurations, but it is backed by a highly regarded customer service team providing in-depth support. StrongDM facilitates a faster deployment process and is commended for its responsive support, which is ideal for teams requiring quick setup and ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk may incur a higher initial setup cost because of its rich feature environment but delivers substantial ROI through improved security posture. StrongDM offers a more cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and a good ROI for organizations focusing on efficient access management and faster value realization.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: April 2026).

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (3rd)

StrongDM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.4%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 2.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.4%
StrongDM	2.5%
Other	95.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Diego Rivera

Commercial and Technical Professional Manager at Evolution Technologies Group

Strengthening financial services infrastructure by safeguarding and integrating with ecosystems

We use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to complement a privilege access management solution in order to avoid golden ticket attacks and strengthen services against attacks. It serves as a complement to our asset management solution. The architecture of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is beneficial for integrating with all customer ecosystems; it's easy to deploy, and achieving that level of integration and control is more challenging with other solutions. The ability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to safeguard our financial services infrastructure is very important, as we need to record actions on privileges in our information systems. Regarding the granularity of the managed controls in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, we have different levels of features to define compensations and capabilities, which help us verify configurations and access, ultimately keeping the safety of rights intact. Our initial challenge with CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is to comply with Colombian regulations in the financial sector, particularly identifying users and managing password changes and rotations. We needed to certify the identities and provide necessary information for government investigations, if required. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very important for helping our organization meet compliance and regulatory requirements. We have to comply with international regulations such as SOC, but also with local regulations unique to the financial sector, which is crucial for us due to the high risks involved. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helped us reduce the time for regulatory processes to approximately two to four months, completing the solution and training. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has helped us reduce the mean time to detect within our organization. That's our main goal. Regarding MTTD, the solution provides enough information to enhance our overall detection process. We have an 85% improvement in MTTD. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helps ensure data privacy through strategies that manage information in real-time. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helps save costs by avoiding risks and future expenses associated with security incidents. It's essential to communicate the value of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to users, as its controls help improve system security. My role at the company involves service and sales activities.

Read full review

reviewer2804475

Iam Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Access management has improved privileged logins while still needing fewer crashes and less upkeep

The best features in StrongDM are the password rotation capabilities, which I think are pretty cool, and also how you can literally log in to any of the privileged servers through a single platform. You just copy-paste the IP and the port number and log in over there through RDP, so I think that's pretty cool. I have used CyberArk before, but I think StrongDM as a product has pretty good potential. My impression of the credential-less access control is that it's pretty good because it reduces the attack surface. Basically, if you cannot see the password and everything, even the privileged users cannot see the password. It's a password-less system where you just log in to the servers without knowing your password, and even if you know your password, it's probably going to be rotated after a while. So, I think that's a pretty good use case for reducing the attack surface and maintaining zero trust throughout an identity perimeter. StrongDM helps with runtime features in a twenty-four-seven dynamic environment. Whenever I try to access at maybe two a.m. or three a.m. at night and I have a production issue on a server located in a different continent, I can access it right at that moment. I think the application works pretty much like a charm. It's readily available, and I think the runtime feature is pretty cool, although the application sometimes crashes when it's downloaded locally on your machine. Regarding pricing, I find StrongDM to be definitely cost-efficient. We used to use CyberArk before, but StrongDM is more cost-effective, which is why we are using it. Our director is a board member at StrongDM, allowing us to utilize the product and the flexibility it provides, which tailor-suits our needs based on the organization and is something we do not get from other PAM products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Product-wise we don't face that many issues, and basic integration of users and assigning them the rules and other stuff like that is, compared to other options, very straightforward."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."

"The stability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is excellent, with an uptime of 99.99 percent."

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."

"It doesn't affect operational efficiency. If you set everything correctly, the user doesn't notice that it is in the background."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"The best features in StrongDM are that it is the easiest product in the market for this situation with easy access."

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."

"The best features in StrongDM are the password rotation capabilities, which I think are pretty cool, and also how you can literally log in to any of the privileged servers through a single platform."

"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."

"I absolutely would say that the best features of StrongDM and what I appreciate about the solution is that time to onboard is absolutely minimal."

Cons

"Despite newer versions and functionalities, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks sufficient knowledgeable support staff, resulting in longer wait times for assistance."

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."

"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM. These tools need to be defined and synced with the client or agent and master, sometimes needing manual checks."

"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

"I rate the stability of the product five out of ten because crashes sometimes happen when we are working on it."

"My thoughts on the pricing of StrongDM is that it is expensive."

"I think the stability of StrongDM is about four to five due to the occasional crashes that I mentioned."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

"The cost for CyberArk is very high."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"It is an expensive solution."

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

In StrongDM, I think the installation was hard, and they want to be more flexible in the initial setup. I think they want to add more features like traditional PAM. It is difficult to find document...

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

My use case involves a company I'm working in that wants to secure the connectivity between the DevOps team and the backend server in the company.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 21% of the time

KeeperPAM vs StrongDM

Compared 19% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 18% of the time

HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM

Compared 12% of the time

More StrongDM Competitors

Product Reports

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

May 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Download StrongDM product report

April 2026

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security by controlling access, removing admin rights, and managing privileges. It supports diverse environments with simple integration, focusing on credential detection, threat protection, and compliance.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager secures enterprise passwords, monitors session connections, and enhances cybersecurity by controlling privileged access. It blocks unauthorized applications, monitors user activities, and secures credentials across platforms. Key areas include Just-In-Time Access, privilege separation, and local administrator password rotation. While robust, challenges exist with performance, complexity, and setup. Integration with Linux and Unix needs improvement, requiring advanced reporting tools and easier policy management. Pricing concerns and maintenance issues with Windows servers persist, as well as database issues in the on-prem version.

What are the key features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Admin Rights Removal: Eliminates unnecessary permissions to enhance security.
Privilege Management: Offers detailed control over user access rights.
Password Rotation: Automatically updates passwords to protect sensitive data.
Threat Protection: Blocks malicious applications and threats proactively.
Audit Capabilities: Provides comprehensive security and compliance tracking.
Application Control: Confines access to authorized applications only.
Automatic Updates: Ensures security protocols and software remain current.

What benefits should organizations expect from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risks by controlling credential and application access.
Compliance Assurance: Meets industry standards through thorough tracking and reporting.
Scalable Integration: Adapts to different environments smoothly.
Reduced Management Efforts: Automates credential and policy management.

Organizations deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from secure credential management across Unix, AWS, and GCP. By implementing privilege separation and monitoring user activities, they achieve effective risk mitigation and compliance across multiple platforms.

CyberArk

StrongDM streamlines secure, password-less access, reducing attack surfaces with its zero trust approach. It integrates smoothly with existing systems supporting IP whitelisting and excels in managing runtime features while offering comprehensive audit logging and seamless resource access.

StrongDM provides organizations with enhanced security through features like password rotation and efficient management of access to resources such as EC2 instances, Kubernetes clusters, and databases. Its integration capabilities are complemented by cost-effectiveness compared to competitors like CyberArk. Companies utilize StrongDM for controlling access in dynamic environments, benefiting from audit logging for detailed movement tracking. While users appreciate its efficiency, they also seek improvements in update control and better accompanying documentation. Some express the need for a cloud-native option to address diverse demands, as the current setup can be challenging without comprehensive materials. Flexibility and more traditional PAM features are in demand.

What are StrongDM's key features?

Secure Password-less Access: Facilitates client connections without passwords to reduce attack vectors.
Zero Trust Architecture: Maintains stringent security protocols with a zero trust approach.
Seamless Resource Integration: Works effectively with systems like EC2 and Kubernetes clusters.
IP Whitelisting Support: Enhances third-party resource accessibility with targeted IP controls.
Audit Logging: Provides detailed tracking of user interactions within systems.
Password Rotation: Regularly updates access credentials to boost security.

Why is StrongDM beneficial in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing offers value against alternatives.
Resource Management Efficiency: Simplifies access to complex systems.
Enhanced Security: Protective measures reduce vulnerabilities and ensure secure transactions.
Zero Trust Implementation: Adopts advanced security models right into client operations.
Operational Streamlining: Eases the access management process for multiple environments.

In industries managing sensitive data or requiring regulated access, StrongDM is crucial for securing cloud private networks and managing user access to databases and hosts. DevOps teams benefit from its ability to protect connectivity to backend servers, ensuring identity and access management remains robust and adaptable for companies dealing with frequent changes or expansions.