CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM comparison

CyberArk and StrongDM are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while StrongDM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0. CyberArk holds a 2.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to StrongDM’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StrongDM users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

3,967 Views
1,190 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

StrongDM

Read 2 StrongDM reviews

802 Views
674 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

StrongDM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and StrongDM compete in the security management category. StrongDM holds an advantage due to better versatility and user satisfaction, overshadowing CyberArk's pricing and support.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is known for its robust privilege security, granular controls, and ease of enhancing endpoint security. StrongDM offers seamless access control across various environments, supports numerous protocols, and integrates widely.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StrongDM provides a straightforward deployment process with superior service support, allowing quick integration into infrastructures. CyberArk, while offering substantial service, has a more complex deployment process, potentially extending implementation time.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a competitive pricing model with reasonable setup costs, enhancing security measures and ensuring good ROI. Although StrongDM's pricing is higher, it justifies this with a notable return due to expansive features and operational efficiency. Despite a higher upfront investment, StrongDM delivers perceived increased value.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)

StrongDM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.6%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StrongDM is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.6%
StrongDM	2.0%
Other	95.4%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

reviewer2589615

Senior Data Engineer at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamlessly manage cloud access with enhanced security features

I was part of the team managing the infrastructure for a small startup company. We used StrongDM to provide access to cloud private networks, control user access to databases, hosts through SSH, and Kubernetes resources StrongDM was able to replace the combination of different products we…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."

"Regarding the granularity of the managed controls in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, we have different levels of features to define compensations and capabilities, which help us verify configurations and access, ultimately keeping the safety of rights intact."

"It doesn't affect operational efficiency. If you set everything correctly, the user doesn't notice that it is in the background."

"It allows whitelisting."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its scalability."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has had a positive impact on my customers' security posture."

"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

"All of the logging is handled for us, including for auditing purposes. Looking through the audit logs is not a painful experience."

"StrongDM replaced the puzzle of different solutions with one single product, which made managing resources more efficient."

Cons

"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."

"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases."

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"The tool is a bit pricey compared to its competitors. My company does work with competitors, but I don't have hands-on experience with other software. I've just done some comparisons."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"We pay about $17 per user."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Leisure / Travel Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

The leadership chose StrongDM after comparative research, which suggests economic benefits. It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases. Also, documentation s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 11% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 19% of the time

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs StrongDM

Compared 19% of the time

HashiCorp Boundary vs StrongDM

Compared 18% of the time

KeeperPAM vs StrongDM

Compared 14% of the time

Teleport vs StrongDM

Compared 12% of the time

More StrongDM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

January 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download StrongDM product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

StrongDM offers an innovative solution for managing infrastructure access, focusing on security and compliance while ensuring streamlined operations.

StrongDM simplifies infrastructure access by unifying management and auditing capabilities. It provides a seamless way for organizations to quickly secure sensitive data across all environments, enhancing access control without compromising efficiency. With a focus on integrating access data and compliance requirements, StrongDM is designed to meet the needs of security-conscious organizations.

What are standout features of StrongDM?

Access Management: Centralizes access control, reducing complexity.
Auditability: Offers detailed logs for thorough audit trails.
Compliance Support: Ensures compliance with industry standards.
Scalability: Adapts to changes in infrastructure effortlessly.

What are the benefits of choosing StrongDM?

Enhanced Security: Reports show improved security postures.
Efficiency Gains: Users experience reduced time in access management.
Improved Compliance: Facilitates meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost Effectiveness: Invests in reducing potential data breaches.

In finance and healthcare industries, StrongDM is often implemented to safeguard sensitive information, ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. It provides an agile approach to access management, which is critical for sectors dealing with confidential data and strict compliance mandates.

StrongDM

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

December 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. StrongDM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.