Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Logpoint comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 23 Logpoint reviews

871 Views
416 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason and Logpoint offer robust solutions in the endpoint detection and response category. Cybereason holds the upper hand in terms of support and pricing flexibility, though Logpoint’s advanced functionalities justify its higher cost.

Features: Cybereason is praised for its intuitive alerting system, threat detection capabilities, and pricing flexibility. Logpoint users highlight its advanced analytics, customizability, and comprehensive feature set. Despite both products having strong feature sets, Logpoint's advanced analytics give it a slight edge.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users suggest improvements in integration capabilities, reporting features, and overall system performance. Logpoint users indicate the need for enhancements in system performance, documentation, and deployment process. Both products have unique areas needing focus, but Cybereason requires better integration enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason users find the deployment process straightforward and commend the excellent customer service. Logpoint users mention that while deployment can be complex, the customer service is efficient. Both products provide good customer service, but Cybereason has a simpler deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Cybereason reasonably priced, appreciating its quick ROI. Logpoint’s higher cost is offset by its comprehensive features, leading to a longer but substantial ROI. Cybereason is favored for its cost-effectiveness, while Logpoint is seen as a valuable long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint Report (Updated: March 2025).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)

Logpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (23rd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (8th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Abdullah Secca

Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller

Valuable monitoring and integration features boost compliance

They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined. They migrated operations from Boston to Denmark, and we cannot use a tool hosted outside the country. Additionally, dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"The solution is efficient."

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The solution offers excellent reporting features. Our customers have been satisfied that they have been able to meet their compliance needs by giving them a standard report."

"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."

"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."

"It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. LogPoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parseable because all logs are not the same, but with LogPoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"In my experience with medium-sized operations, LogPoint's scalability is excellent, so I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."

"The UEBA component, as well as the SOAR component, are some of the most valuable features of Logpoint."

More Logpoint pros

Cons

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"They need to improve their technical support services."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Dashboards could be developed further."

"The documentation part is something that needs to be improved, as well as the threat intelligence investigation part."

"I would rate the stability of Logpoint as a six out of ten. I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint."

"Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."

"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable. If a log has a very specific structure, it is very easy to parse and create a parser for it, but if a log has a free form, meaning that it is of any length or it can change at any time, handling such a log is very challenging, not just in LogPoint but also in everything else. Everybody struggles with that scenario, and LogPoint is also in the same boat. One-third of logs are of free form or not of a specific length, and you can run into situations where it is almost impossible to parse the log, even if they try to help you. It is just the nature of the beast."

"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."

"The interface needs things like wizards that will assist with creating complex correlation rules."

"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."

More Logpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing is manageable."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"It's getting more expensive, which is one of the reasons we're looking around just to see if there's anything better value."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"It's less expensive than the competitors. The Logpoint marketing team is very accommodating and client-friendly. They offer very good reductions in price. They are pretty good in this aspect. They are transparent in their licensing and pricing."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

64%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about LogPoint?

The solution is user-friendly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

The pricing is reasonable. The costs are charged on a yearly basis, however, I do not want to disclose exact figures.

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 21% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 16% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Logpoint

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Logpoint

Compared 10% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Logpoint product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Logpoint is a cutting-edge security information and event management (SIEM) solution that is designed to be intuitive and flexible enough to be used by an array of different businesses. It is capable of expanding according to its users' needs.

Benefits of Logpoint

Some of the benefits of using Logpoint include:

Unifies data logs: Logpoint creates a single system of classification for collected data. It makes it easy for users to search for and find data, which aids users when they are creating reports or alerts. Users can conserve resources while at the same time seeing a rise in the efficiency of their business operations.

Intuitive solution design: Logpoint is designed so that anyone can utilize all of its features, even if they are not an expert in network security. Logpoint’s UI is simple enough that users can utilize it without undergoing extensive training.

Highly flexible: Logpoint is designed so that users can scale it linearly to accommodate projects that are large and complex. This allows users to expand the scope of their projects according to their needs without worrying that their infrastructure won’t be able to handle the increase in size. The solution’s security features can be deployed both on the cloud and in a physical environment.

Simple role-based access security: Logpoint allows administrators to employ Microsoft’s active directory (AD) and a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol to manage user access. These can help administrators protect their systems from being abused or otherwise harmed by bad actors.

Reviews from Real Users

Logpoint is a security and management solution that stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its data gathering and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Logpoint enables users to not only gather the data, but also to maximize both the amount of data that can be gathered and its usefulness. It removes many of the challenges that users may face in data collection. The solution allows users to set rules for collection and then it pulls information from sources that meet the rules that have been set. This data is then broken into manageable segments and ordered. Users can then analyze these ordered segments with ease. Additionally, LogPoint utilizes both machine learning and AI technology. Users gain the ability to protect themselves from and if necessary resolve emerging threats as soon as they arise. The AI sets security parameters for a user’s system. These act as a baseline that are triggered and notify the user if anything deviates from the rules that it set up.

The chief infrastructure & security officer at a financial services firm writes, “It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. Logpoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parsed because all logs are not the same, but with Logpoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them.”

A. Secca., a Cyber Security Analyst at a transportation company, writes, “It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all of the user’s activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline.”

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint