Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Datamatics TruCap+ vs UiPath Document Understanding comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Datamatics TruCap+
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Document Understanding
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Datamatics TruCap+ is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Document Understanding is 12.6%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

IS
Comes with API services and data analytics features but needs to improve stability
We use the product for API and interface collections.  The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics.  Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability.  I have been working with the product for a month.  I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten.  The product is…
Gangadhar Wali - PeerSpot reviewer
Pre-trained models work well, but it is very expensive
We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number. These discrepancies should be fixed because if the OCR itself doesn't work properly, then AI doesn't help with that. When AI is used for training models, the AI Center works precisely, but if the data itself is wrong, we can't do anything. If the extraction of data is proper, it definitely helps. However, 20% errors could be reduced if the OCR engine were better. In future updates, I would like to see better handling of issues such as when a dot is missing in currency, for example, with dollars, it should handle that automatically. It's very expensive. If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics."
"Pre-trained models are valuable, and they work well."
"The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined."
"I like UiPath's machine-learning capabilities. My first impressions were good, but we only use it in a few processes. We intend to expand our use of these features in other situations, but we're still learning how to use the AI functions. We use the OCR much more."
"The UiPath Document Understanding tool is very easy to use for document understanding."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good."
"UiPath enables us to automate manual tasks and duplicate them easily. The processes are highly accurate."
"The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes."
"UiPath Document Understanding's image file extraction feature is the best in any OCR solution."
 

Cons

"Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability."
"UiPath Document Understanding has difficulty identifying handwritten documents, and there is room for improvement."
"We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number."
"There are also problems with handwritten documents. The results from those are not 90 percent accurate. With scanned and native PDFs, it is 90 to 99 percent accurate, but the accuracy of handwritten documents is somewhat less. If they could improve on that, it would also be helpful."
"It would be ideal if they could include more packages for more use cases."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Document Understanding is data extraction from scanned documents. It could be better because I've observed a ten percent failure or flaw whenever the vendor scans and converts documents into PDFs."
"Right now, we are trying to use Instabase, which is another tool for document understanding."
"The coding machine learning could be a little bit better."
"There could be a feature similar to ChatGPT where when you ask about a document, you get an answer about what is there in that document. If possible, this kind of feature can be incorporated so that you do not need to open a file and take the value. It should directly detect that instead of opening and validating the document. Such a feature will speed up the process."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate UiPath Document Understanding an eight on cost."
"While Robotic Process Automation tools can be expensive, UiPath Document Understanding is no exception."
"Document Understanding's price is quite high."
"I do not know about its price, but for large organizations, UiPath is cheap, whereas, for small organizations, UiPath is high. For example, if 500 licenses are needed for one company, UiPath is cheap. If only 5 licenses are required, UiPath is costly."
"I used the community version, so there was no fee."
"UiPath Document Understanding is priced high compared to its competition."
"It is expensive. The license cost for UiPath Studio has risen to around 3.5 lakhs last year, and I am uncertain how much the increase will be this year. They have also increased the bot prices."
"The pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Datamatics TruCap+?
The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics.
What needs improvement with Datamatics TruCap+?
Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability.
What is your primary use case for Datamatics TruCap+?
We use the product for API and interface collections.
What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
It is expensive. The license cost for UiPath Studio has risen to around 3.5 lakhs last year, and I am uncertain how much the increase will be this year. They have also increased the bot prices. The...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is m...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ARI Global Fleet Management, Ashapura Minechem Ltd, Blue Star, BUPA, Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA)
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: May 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.