Devo vs Falcon LogScale comparison

Devo and CrowdStrike are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while CrowdStrike is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.3. Devo holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to CrowdStrike’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CrowdStrike users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

3,179 Views
1,590 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Falcon LogScale

Read 4 Falcon LogScale reviews

1,295 Views
1,269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Falcon LogScale

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Devo and Falcon LogScale are competitive solutions in the data analytics space. Falcon LogScale often has the upper hand in feature offerings and performance, suggesting higher user satisfaction despite costs.

Features: Devo provides robust capabilities with seamless integration and analytics depth, while Falcon LogScale offers advanced real-time monitoring, scalability, and adaptability for diverse organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: Devo requires better documentation and customization options, whereas Falcon LogScale needs to improve analytical speed and simplify setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo is known for straightforward deployment but has mixed service reviews. Falcon LogScale ensures a smooth deployment process and reliable customer support, enhancing the user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Devo appeals to cost-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and quick ROI. Falcon LogScale is more expensive, but users find the long-term ROI justifies the cost due to its premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Falcon LogScale Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Falcon LogScale

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th), IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)

Falcon LogScale

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Devo	0.8%
Falcon LogScale	0.8%
Other	98.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

reviewer2783883

Developer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

Improved log visibility has simplified troubleshooting across firewall and directory events

Falcon LogScale offers excellent features, with scalability being the most notable. The search speed stands out to me as particularly good. Falcon LogScale has positively impacted my organization by providing visibility of the logs, making it easier for us to troubleshoot any issues. The visibility makes troubleshooting easier overall because you can see the logs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

More Devo pros

"Falcon LogScale offers excellent features, with scalability being the most notable, and the search speed stands out to me as particularly good."

"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."

"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."

"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."

Cons

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

More Devo cons

"The price could be lower."

"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."

"The integration could improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?

I do not see any improvements needed for Falcon LogScale at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?

My main use case for Falcon LogScale is using it as a SIEM to collect logs. I collect all firewall logs and Active Directory logs through Falcon LogScale as a SIEM for collecting logs.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Falcon LogScale?

My advice to others looking into using Falcon LogScale is that it is easy to use and very efficient. I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Security vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 12% of the time

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 9% of the time

More Falcon LogScale Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

February 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

January 2026

Download Falcon LogScale product report

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Falcon LogScale

December 2025

Free Report: Devo vs. Falcon LogScale

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Falcon LogScale and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Falcon LogScale report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.