Devo vs Palantir Foundry comparison

Devo and Palantir are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palantir is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Devo holds a 4.5% mindshare in IOA, compared to Palantir’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Palantir users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

5,226 Views
1,045 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Palantir Foundry

Read 18 Palantir Foundry reviews

11,675 Views
701 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Devo

Palantir Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Devo and Palantir Foundry are competitors in the data analytics and integration software market. While both offer robust solutions, Devo holds an edge with its cloud-first architecture and real-time analytics specifically tailored for security operations.

Features: Devo offers advanced Activeboards, real-time analytics, and a seamless multi-tenant environment, providing advantages in security operations. Its cloud-first architecture ensures scalability and efficiency, while extended log retention enhances data management. Palantir Foundry excels in data integration and transformation with strong visualization capabilities and an end-to-end tech stack encompassing robust plugin connectors and comprehensive data lineage.

Room for Improvement: Devo can improve AI capabilities, customize features better, and address pricing unpredictability. Enhancements are also needed in browser-based searches and support for third-party integrations. Meanwhile, Palantir Foundry could benefit from simplifying its setup process and enhancing front-end capabilities. Better online documentation and cost efficiency would be advantageous as well.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo provides flexibility with various deployment options, including hybrid cloud and on-premises, while striving for responsive customer service. However, users have pointed out the need for more technical support responsiveness. Palantir Foundry focuses on public cloud deployments and prioritizes customer support, though it can improve its escalation process.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's pricing model based on data ingestion, though potentially leading to higher costs, offers budgeting predictability, and users appreciate its infrastructure cost savings. Palantir Foundry's pricing is perceived as high, but the value from its integration capabilities can justify the expense. Both aim to optimize ROI by reducing mean time to remediation, with Devo's model offering notable flexibility and cost benefits for different organization sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Palantir Foundry Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Palantir Foundry

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (27th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), AIOps (19th)

Palantir Foundry

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (13th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Data Migration Appliances (3rd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st), Data and Analytics Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.5%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 4.0%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.5%
Palantir Foundry	4.0%
Other	91.5%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

Sai Arun Bandhakavi

Associate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Unified data workflows have empowered collaborative analytics and streamlined AI development

Regarding points for improvement for Palantir Foundry, I see that they are improving day by day. In the last one to two years, I have seen many improvements compared to the two years that I have worked on Palantir Foundry. There are many things that come up, but a few things are not intuitive enough. Now that we are in this AI phase, Palantir Foundry has created some wrappers around the models, allowing us to create using a no-code application, chatbots, and LLM functions. The problem is that interaction with outside applications can be difficult with the current setup that Palantir Foundry has. There are ways to do that, but it is not that intuitive, which is what I feel.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

More Devo pros

"The data lineage is great."

"Great features available in one tool."

"The ease of use is my favorite feature. We're able to build different models and projects or combine different projects to build one use case."

"The solution provides an end-to-end integrated tech stack that takes care of all utility/infrastructure topics for you."

"This product has all the various components for getting data, transforming it and visually creating the dashboards without the need to integrate things and no need to check the compatibility."

"It is easy to map out a workflow and run trigger-based scripts without having to deploy to another server."

"The security is also excellent. It's highly granular, so the admins have a high degree of control, and there are many levels of security. That worked well. You won't have an EDC unless you put everything onto the platform because it is its own isolated thing."

"Palantir Foundry is a robust platform that has really strong plugin connectors and provides features for real-time integration."

More Palantir Foundry pros

Cons

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run."

More Devo cons

"The solution’s data security could be improved."

"There is not a wide user base for the solution's online documentation so it is sometimes difficult to find answers."

"There are some issues with scalability because when we are using a really large dataset, the system is rather slow."

"The workflow could be improved. Although it works rather seamlessly, the workflow is too complicated sometimes."

"The frontend capabilities of Palantir Foundry could be improved."

"The data lineage was challenging. It's hard to track data from the sources as it moves through stages. Informatica EDC can easily capture and report it because it talks to the metadata. This is generated across those various staging points."

"The major hindrance with Palantir Foundry is that being a very closed product, the cost optimization and costing are not exposed to the end users."

"Compared to other hyperscalers, Palantir Foundry is complex and not so user-intuitive."

More Palantir Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."

"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."

"The solution’s pricing is high."

"It's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?

There are several use cases that we are working on with Palantir Foundry. The first thing is for data model creation for all our data engineering pipelines. That is one use case. Palantir Foundry a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?

The visualization part in Palantir Foundry works for me at least if I want to see how the data is structured and for an initial analysis, but I would say it is not as matured as Power BI or Tableau...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Cognizant AI & Analytics vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 6% of the time

Confluent vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 4% of the time

Palantir Gotham vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

Databricks vs Palantir Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

More Palantir Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

May 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Palantir Foundry

April 2026

Download Palantir Foundry product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Palantir Foundry offers intuitive data management and application development, prioritizing accessibility through low-code/no-code tools, enabling users to integrate, analyze, and collaborate efficiently.

Palantir Foundry centers on user accessibility, data governance, and real-time capabilities, streamlining processes with low-code/no-code development. It supports comprehensive data analysis and integration, enhanced by digital twin features that align virtual and physical interactions. Despite high costs and performance challenges with large datasets, it remains a prime choice for sectors needing structured and unstructured data integration. Key areas include robust data security, lineage tracking, and predictive analytics, promoted through a unified management platform adaptable to diverse needs.

What are the key features of Palantir Foundry?

User-friendly interface enabling easy data governance and automation.
Real-time integration with strong data analysis and collaboration tools.
Low-code/no-code development to widen accessibility.
Digital twin capabilities for bi-directional process integration.
Strong data lineage, predictive analytics, and visualization tools.
Flexibility and customization options.

What benefits and ROI could reviews highlight?

Improved decision-making through enhanced data visibility.
Increased efficiency with automated data processes.
Broader accessibility to data insights via low-code options.
Enhanced collaboration and integration between departments.
Potential cost savings through streamlined operations.

In manufacturing, Palantir Foundry aids in engineering pipeline models and semantic frameworks, while utilities utilize its analytics to enhance service delivery. Insurance firms leverage its capability to assess and predict customer behavior. Throughout these industries, Foundry integrates across cloud environments, bridging structured and unstructured data from various sources.

Palantir

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Palantir Foundry

April 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Palantir Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Palantir Foundry and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Palantir Foundry report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.