

ScienceLogic and Devo are two leading products in network monitoring and management. ScienceLogic excels in monitoring and troubleshooting, while Devo stands out for its advanced analytics features and real-time processing, making it a more powerful option for users needing detailed data insights.
Features: ScienceLogic users value its thorough monitoring and alerting capabilities, particularly its integration with various IT systems. Devo is recognized for its superior data analytics, real-time event processing, and comprehensive feature set.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that ScienceLogic can improve its integration capabilities, system automation, and user interface. Devo users recommend enhancing reporting features, data visualization tools, and overall usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is known for complex initial deployment but offers responsive customer service and support. Devo provides a more straightforward deployment process with excellent customer support, making it easier to deploy.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic has relatively lower setup costs, offering good ROI due to its extensive monitoring features. Devo’s higher initial cost is justified by its advanced analytics capabilities, delivering robust ROI for users needing detailed data insights.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
Integrations with other sandboxes could be improved to better interpret data using AI and machine learning models.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Devo | 4.5% |
| ScienceLogic | 4.1% |
| Other | 91.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.
Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.
What are Devo's most important features?Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.