Docker vs Google Kubernetes Engine comparison

Docker and Google are both solutions in the Container Management category. Docker is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Google is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. Docker holds a 2.9% mindshare in CM, compared to Google’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Google users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 56 Docker reviews

1,362 Views
1,085 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Google Kubernetes Engine

Read 37 Google Kubernetes Engine reviews

1,085 Views
847 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Docker

Google Kubernetes Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Google Kubernetes Engine and Docker compete in the cloud infrastructure and containerization space. GKE appears to have the upper hand due to its robust infrastructure management and advanced auto-scaling capabilities.

Features: GKE is known for its ease of deployment, seamless multi-cloud support, and advanced auto-scaling capabilities. It integrates well with Google's ecosystem, enhancing its usability for machine learning applications. On the other hand, Docker excels in containerization, providing a flexible and user-friendly environment with fast deployment times. Its simplicity in container orchestration and cross-environment consistency is beneficial for straightforward containerization.

Room for Improvement: Google Kubernetes Engine could enhance application-level security, backup systems, and provide more integrated tools to reduce reliance on third-party software. Improved documentation and support are also necessary. Docker could focus on improving stability and security features, enriching documentation, and offering straightforward management tools. Integration of GPU support and enhancing user interfaces are potential areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GKE primarily operates on public cloud infrastructure, making it scalable and easy to deploy. However, customer service experiences vary, with noted slow response times and a need for better documentation. Docker offers flexibility with deployments across on-premises, public, private, and hybrid clouds, though its support largely depends on community resources, with professional support available via a paid license.

Pricing and ROI: GKE is a paid service with flexible pricing based on usage, offering excellent operational productivity but potentially higher costs compared to competitors like AWS. Docker is mostly open-source and free, with a paid Enterprise version including additional features. GKE's costs are linked to virtual machine and resource requirements, while Docker offers cost efficiency through its open-source nature. Both provide worthwhile ROI, though cost structures vary; GKE costs are driven by infrastructure needs, whereas Docker remains cost-effective.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Container Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Software Supply Chain Security (6th)

Google Kubernetes Engine

Ranking in Container Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Docker is 2.9%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Kubernetes Engine is 2.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Useful to create sandbox environments to run applications and makes it easy to test them

Overall, setting up the Docker environment is quite easy. Many methods exist, such as using Docker Compose and Docker networks to communicate between containers. The main challenge lies in designing the architecture and integrating different frameworks and microservices. I would rate the ease of setting up the tool at around nine out of ten. The time it takes to deploy depends on the scale of the system. For the early-stage startup I'm currently working with, it doesn't take much time. It's just me handling the deployment. In our early-stage startup, we have a couple of teams with around four to five backend APIs and two front-end services. Deploying these doesn't take much time. My focus is more on minimizing costs due to our lean startup structure.

Read full review

Abhilash Gopidas

Deployment Manager at HealthEdge Software, Inc.

The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great

The product has no downtime. Automated scaling is a valuable feature. During peak hours, the datasets are on a higher volume. We need scaling in place. Otherwise, there's a degradation in the performance. We might sometimes miss data, or there will be no data sync between systems. Auto-scaling helps deal with performance needs during peak hours. There's no lag time for processing data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Docker is its portability, ease of security management, and low resource usage."

"When used in conjunction with Kubernetes, it is seamless because it integrates very well."

"I think that with Docker, it is easy to deploy it on different platforms."

"The stability is excellent."

"The deployment is quite fast, which is beneficial."

"Traditional deployments take more time and builds can be inconsistent across different environments. Docker solves these issues."

"Docker is perfect for what I do...The solution is scalable."

"The scalability of Docker is good."

More Docker pros

"The product has valuable security features. It can connect with multiple DevOps tools."

"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable features are microservices and its acquisition rate, which is very useful for scaling perspective."

"Its functionalities, such as computing the namespaces, clusters, pods, and restart logs, are easy to use."

"The most beneficial feature is the ability to separate each project and manage permissions more effectively."

"GKE's plugin management and configuration sync are excellent features. The amount of data it provides is good, and I've been able to integrate it with the things I need."

"The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."

"We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."

"Before using this solution, it was a lot of manual tasks and a lot of people participated in the process."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pros

Cons

"In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved."

"The documentation could be improved."

"We would like to see improvement in adding the node into the Docker Swarm cluster, as at present it is a little tricky and requires a lot of manual steps."

"We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system."

"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."

"Sometimes, we have sync-up issues where the build doesn't get processed due to these sync issues, causing the build to fail. That's one of the drawbacks I see. When we did a huge sync-up, we faced a couple of issues. It takes some time for us to complete the sync-up. For frequent, smaller updates, we haven't had any issues. However, challenges can arise for those who prefer doing everything in one go. This might not necessarily be due to the tool itself but because of the approach of doing everything in a single batch."

"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."

"Deployment could be quicker."

More Docker cons

"Google Kubernetes Engine's cost should be improved because it is high."

"Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise."

"The user interface is a bit confusing sometimes. You need to navigate between the various consoles we have. It's hard to figure out where things are. It's frustrating. The documentation could be a bit better."

"The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement."

"There are some security issues, but it might just be because we are not up to speed yet as much as we should be and so we haven't found it in the documentation yet. That's why I don't want to confuse this. Still, it could be a little bit easier to understand and implement."

"The management UI could be improved. When looking at the web interface, it feels kind of slow due to the many features involved."

"We would like to see some improvement in the ease of integration with this solution."

"There is room for improvement in the cluster updates process. Specifically, when managing both non-production and production clusters, we need a sequential functionality."

More Google Kubernetes Engine cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Docker is cost-effective and open-source."

"It's free."

"I would rate the pricing of Docker as ten out of ten"

"The product is not expensive."

"Since Docker is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."

"Customers pay for the license through a yearly subscription model, where they pay per license. This means that the license is based on a subscription, and the customer pays annually for each license they use."

"Docker is a free-to-use solution. However, Docker Enterprise is not free."

"Docker's price is good."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"It is competitive, and it is not expensive. It is almost competitive with AWS and the rest of the cloud solutions. We are spending around 3K USD per month. There are four projects that are currently running, and each one is incurring a cost of around 3K USD."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"Initially, Google Kubernetes Engine was a little bit cheaper, but now its prices have been increased compared to the pricing model and the features that are made available by its competitors."

"The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."

"We are planning to use external support, and hire a commercial partner for it."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. The product is competitively priced."

"This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."

"The pricing for GKE is dependent on the type of machine or virtual machine (VM) that is selected for the nodes in the cluster. There is a degree of flexibility in choosing the specifications of the machine, such as the number of CPUs, GPUs, and so on. Google provides a variety of options, allowing the user to create the desired cluster composition. However, the cost can be quite steep when it comes to regional clusters, which are necessary for high availability and failover. This redundancy is crucial for businesses and is required to handle an increase in requests in case of any issues in one region, such as jumping to a different region in case of a failure in the Toronto region. While it may be tempting to choose the cheapest type of machines, this may result in a limited capacity and user numbers, requiring over-provisioning to handle additional requests, such as those for a web application."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Kubernetes Engine?

The product has no downtime.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes Engine?

The on-demand nodes are quite expensive, so we now use spot machines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?

Gemini could be more integrated with Google Kubernetes Engine ( /products/google-kubernetes-engine-reviews ). For example, it would be helpful if I could easily find log information in a particular...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 28% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Docker

Compared 18% of the time

Mirantis Container Runtime vs Docker

Compared 14% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 13% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Docker

Compared 8% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 26% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 25% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 12% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 9% of the time

More Google Kubernetes Engine Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

March 2025

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Kubernetes Engine

March 2025

Download Google Kubernetes Engine product report

Also Known As

No data available

GKE

Overview

Docker is a versatile container platform used for running and deploying applications in isolated environments, ensuring consistency across development, testing, and production.

Docker offers solutions for containerizing applications, automating deployments, and managing infrastructure through its robust platform. It supports CI/CD workflows, provides a development platform for container management, and simplifies the setup by using streamlined tools. Organizations leverage Docker for building microservices, running UI applications, deploying web services, and setting up secure environments. It also facilitates managing containers via Kubernetes and creating development stacks for enhanced productivity.

What are Docker's key features?

Security: Offers containment and isolation of applications.
Easy Use: Simplifies the deployment and management of applications.
Documentation: Extensive resources to aid in understanding and implementation.
Customization: Flexible environment configurations.
Scalability: Efficiently handles applications irrespective of scale.
Internal DNS: Manages network configurations within the container ecosystem.
Overlay Networks: Facilitates seamless inter-container communication.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes usage of system resources.

What benefits should users look for?

Consistency: Ensures homogeneous environments across development, testing, and production stages.
Portability: Allows applications to run consistently on any platform.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces overhead costs associated with application deployment.
Speed: Accelerates the build, test, and deployment cycles.
Flexibility: Supports various tools and integrations to adapt to different workflows.

Industries implement Docker for CI/CD pipelines, scaling services, and improving resource utilization. Tech companies use Docker for building and deploying their software in isolated environments. Finance and healthcare sectors deploy applications securely, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. Educational institutions set up consistent development environments for coding labs and training students in advanced technologies.

Docker

Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine

March 2025

Free Report: Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.