Docker vs Legit Security comparison

Docker and Legit Security are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. Docker is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while Legit Security is ranked #11. Docker holds a 5.0% mindshare in SSCS, compared to Legit Security’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Legit Security users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 57 Docker reviews

2,794 Views
475 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Legit Security

Read 4 Legit Security reviews

825 Views
561 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Docker

Legit Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Legit Security and Docker compete in cloud security and container management. Docker seems to have the upper hand with superior container orchestration capabilities for seamless application deployment.

Features:Legit Security offers unified application security control, integration with AppSec tools, and comprehensive visibility into software development. Docker provides containerization, efficient resource usage, and easy integration with other solutions.

Room for Improvement:Legit Security can improve its secret detection feature and address false positives. Enhancing reporting capabilities and expanding integration options could also be beneficial. Docker may improve orchestration features, streamline networking configurations, and offer enhanced security insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Docker offers streamlined deployment with extensive documentation, providing seamless integration into existing workflows. Legit Security may require more implementation effort due to its comprehensive security protocols, but its integration with tools like Okta and Jenkins is advantageous.

Pricing and ROI:Legit Security justifies its setup cost with significant prevention of costly breaches, while Docker provides a favorable ROI with competitive pricing and efficient resource management. Docker's containerization technology makes it a compelling investment for modern application deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Legit Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Container Management (4th), AI Software Development (7th)

Legit Security

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

11th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Docker is 5.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Legit Security is 4.5%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Docker	5.0%
Legit Security	4.5%
Other	90.5%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer2787357

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Containerization has standardized deployments and drives faster, more reliable delivery

As Docker is already a very mature tool, there are areas where it can be improved based on real-world usage. One area I consider is the Windows container experience. The pain point here is that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers because I have worked in both environments and felt that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers. This also limits the ecosystem and tooling maturity compared to Linux containers. Improvements could include performance optimization and better parity with Linux container features. Apart from that, observability and debugging is another area. The pain point is the limited native metrics available and limited logging and tracing features. Improvements could include adding a good amount of metrics, logging, and tracing, as well as better built-in observability features and easier container introspection. Network complexity is also present. I face issues with Docker networking that can become confusing in complex setups, and debugging container-to-container issues is not always intuitive. Improvements can be made with simpler networking abstractions and better built-in troubleshooting tools. Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability. These points should be kept in mind and worked on.

Read full review

Tim Crothers

CISO at Mandiant / FireEye

Provides strong visibility, straightforward integration, and reduces the risk of attacks

Legit Security is a product that hyper-focuses on the various aspects of the software development pipeline. For example, if an engineer spins off a new project and stands up a new Git project, Legit automatically detects it, connects Snyk and other tools, and ensures the engineering team doesn't have to think about it. This way, we stay on top of security from the beginning. On the other hand, Legit provides a clear view of the controls around repositories. We have standards requiring code reviews and similar practices, and Legit shows us whether these are being followed. Additionally, Legit helps us identify unmaintained repositories, which often arise when engineering teams try something and leave it behind. This knowledge allows us to determine the appropriate action for these neglected projects. One area where Legit falls short is secret detection. While it functions well overall, the feature has a 10-20 percent false positive rate, requiring some manual intervention. Almost everything else works flawlessly. The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates. Unlike traditional programs that require security reviews at specific stages, hindering development flow, we strive to partner with the product engineering team to ship secure code seamlessly within their existing workflows. Legit plays a crucial role in this by automatically notifying us of new projects, eliminating the need for manual communication. This partnership approach, enabled by Legit, allows us to work much closer with our engineering teams than ever before.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it provides a containerized environment. The isolation between the environments is beneficial. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."

"It is neat and very flexible."

"The deployment is quite fast, which is beneficial."

"When used in conjunction with Kubernetes, it is seamless because it integrates very well."

"Kubernetes is the primary container orchestration tool I use with this solution. Docker provides a complete solution for deploying and managing workloads across multiple nodes. Container orchestration has significantly impacted my workload by automating tasks and streamlining operations. The availability of systems like Kubernetes is crucial for planning and managing complete clusters and computing environments. Every client's needs are different, and not one solution fits all."

"I think the best feature is to replicate anything in our local machine using a simple command."

"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."

"Traditional deployments take more time and builds can be inconsistent across different environments. Docker solves these issues."

More Docker pros

"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."

"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."

"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."

"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."

Cons

"We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system."

"The stability could be improved."

"The learning curve with Docker is huge and extensive"

"The security layer is very vulnerable, although they are working to improve the system hardening and email hardening."

"Management can be improved with the necessary tools for orchestration."

"The vendor should release a monitoring tool or include monitoring capabilities in Docker"

"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."

"There can be challenges with port mapping, however, that's not related to Docker itself."

More Docker cons

"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."

"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."

"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."

"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a free open-source tool."

"Docker is a free open-source solution. However, there is the Docker Enterprise which is a paid solution."

"The solution is an open-source technology and not a commercial product. However, you will have to pay sometimes. The tool's pricing depends on the vendor."

"The solution offers an open-source version that is free and includes a lot of functionality."

"Docker is open source. To use a Docker enterprise model, we would need to pay for it."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"Docker has made some changes and there is an enterprise version that is affordable."

"Docker is a free open-source solution."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

Regarding the cost, Mirantis Container Cloud is cheaper than other solutions like Red Hat. The license costs around 10,000 Indian rupees per year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

Mirantis Container Cloud should have AI integration tools, which are not available right now. These tools should assist in app scalability and deployment error handling.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 11% of the time

Portainer vs Docker

Compared 9% of the time

Minimus vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

Google Kubernetes Engine vs Docker

Compared 5% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Ox Security vs Legit Security

Compared 15% of the time

Apiiro vs Legit Security

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ASPM vs Legit Security

Compared 10% of the time

Cycode vs Legit Security

Compared 9% of the time

Chainguard vs Legit Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Legit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

January 2026

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security

January 2026

Download Legit Security product report

Overview

Docker provides a robust containerization platform, enabling identical environments across machines. With features like portability, fast deployment, and minimal resource consumption, Docker supports development, facilitating multitier architectures and integrating seamlessly with Kubernetes.

Docker offers an advanced containerization solution that enhances application management through automation and security measures. By isolating environments and managing dependencies, Docker supports platforms for scalable application development. Its integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes and independence from host operating systems enable developers to create lightweight applications effectively. Although known for its cost efficiency and flexibility, Docker could improve in areas such as stability, command-line usability, and Windows performance integration. Users also point out the need for enhanced documentation, simplified management tools, and better persistence storage options, along with stronger marketing and easier user adoption.

What important features does Docker provide?

Containerization: Creates consistent environments across machines.
Portability: Runs on different hosts with ease.
Fast Deployment: Speeds up application launches and updates.
Security: Offers isolation and management of dependencies.
Scaling: Supports application scaling and multitier architectures.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Docker?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces resource usage with lightweight containers.
Flexibility: Integrates with orchestration tools like Kubernetes.
Performance: Enhances resource utilization and onboarding.
On-premises Management: Simplifies managing cloud and local setups.

Industries leverage Docker for application packaging, deploying microservices, and CI/CD processes. It supports DevOps, enhances backend service management, and enables resource-efficient development environments. Docker's compatibility with tools such as Jenkins ensures seamless integration and orchestration in modern IT workflows.

Docker

Legit Security provides application security posture management platform that secures application delivery from code to cloud and protects an organization's software supply chain from attack. The platform’s unified application security control plane and automated SDLC discovery and analysis capabilities provide visibility and security control over rapidly changing environments and allow security issues to be prioritized based on context and business criticality to improve security team efficiency and effectiveness.

Legit Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Google, NYSE, Kraft-Hienz, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and many other large enterprise and Fortune 500 customers. Learn more by going to: https://www.legitsecurity.com/...

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Legit Security

December 2025

Free Report: Docker vs. Legit Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Legit Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. Legit Security report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.