Docker vs Rancher Labs comparison

Docker and Rancher Labs are both solutions in the Container Management category. Docker is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Rancher Labs is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Docker holds a 2.9% mindshare in CM, compared to Rancher Labs’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Docker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rancher Labs users who would recommend it.

Docker

Read 56 Docker reviews

1,362 Views
1,085 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Rancher Labs

Read 14 Rancher Labs reviews

3,904 Views
2,996 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Docker

Rancher Labs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Rancher Labs and Docker compete in the container management and deployment category. Based on feature availability and deployment flexibility, Docker often has the upper hand due to its strong security and portability features, while Rancher Labs specializes in Kubernetes management and storage solutions.

Features: Rancher Labs provides flexibility with strong integration, resource management, and excellent persistent storage capabilities for Kubernetes. It offers open-source options and excels in storage management. Docker is favored for its security, detailed documentation, and ease of use, with superior containerization and portability features for efficient deployments across environments.

Room for Improvement: Rancher Labs could enhance stability, advanced integrations, and support for complex multi-cloud deployments. Improving security features and observability tools is suggested. Docker could improve in stability and documentation, requiring more intuitive management interfaces and enhanced security features. Better integrated monitoring and improved handling of GPU resources for machine learning applications are needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rancher Labs is typically implemented on-premises with reliable support via open-source communities. Docker deploys easily across public, private, and hybrid clouds with praised responsive technical support. Docker's flexibility in cloud adaptability sets it apart, offering a more versatile deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Rancher Labs is open-source without licensing fees, providing significant ROI through cost savings, though support fees can be substantial. Docker, largely open-source, offers variable licensing costs based on user needs, facilitating cost-effective scalability. Both offer substantial returns, with Rancher providing comprehensive Kubernetes management without additional expenses unless premium support is selected.

To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Rancher Labs Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Rancher Labs

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Docker

Ranking in Container Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Software Supply Chain Security (6th)

Rancher Labs

Ranking in Container Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Storage for Kubernetes (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Docker is 2.9%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rancher Labs is 8.9%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Useful to create sandbox environments to run applications and makes it easy to test them

Overall, setting up the Docker environment is quite easy. Many methods exist, such as using Docker Compose and Docker networks to communicate between containers. The main challenge lies in designing the architecture and integrating different frameworks and microservices. I would rate the ease of setting up the tool at around nine out of ten. The time it takes to deploy depends on the scale of the system. For the early-stage startup I'm currently working with, it doesn't take much time. It's just me handling the deployment. In our early-stage startup, we have a couple of teams with around four to five backend APIs and two front-end services. Deploying these doesn't take much time. My focus is more on minimizing costs due to our lean startup structure.

Read full review

RyanVassallo

Head of Systems and Infrastructure at Booming Games

Offers an open-source version along with a good UI

The product has multiple good features. One of the solution's good features is that it is the GitOps functionality known as Rancher fleet, which is used for continuous delivery. The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or on-premises, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations. The tool also has a feature that is still kind of maturing, but I think it has very good potential. This new feature is named Harvester, which is allows users to have virtual machines managed by Kubernetes engine. This is very new technology in the market. I think that Harvester needs to mature as a product, and I think that in the future, it will be very powerful. You have one tool that does many things for you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Docker allows you to run multiple virtual machines independently."

"The solution helps save costs."

"Docker is highly scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server."

"The lift and shift creates a lightweight image."

"Docker's containerization property is its main selling point."

"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."

"The most valuable feature is the simple containerization."

More Docker pros

"The solution has a lot of good features, such as you can access the console and edit through the GUI. The dashboard and the UI are designed well, user-friendly, and easy to manage, and access."

"The customized deployment process is the most valuable feature in Rancher Labs."

"A great UI with very good integrations."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source solution that is easy to deploy."

"The product is simple to use for a beginner."

"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."

"The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration."

More Rancher Labs pros

Cons

"Deployment could be quicker."

"Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."

"The solution is not easy to manage and it is one of the reasons why people introduce orchestration tools to manage it."

"Stability is an area with a shortcoming."

"The backup compatibility for legacy window stations is an area of concern where improvement is required, especially since my company has certain legacy tools that we are struggling to move."

"The stability could be improved."

"If you install Docker on a host, it creates its own firewalls. It can become an issue. Usually, when you want to install Docker, you need to restart the firewall or restart the active tables on the machine, but this is not the case with Kubernetes. It uses the default set up by the next administrator, but with Docker, you have to restart the firewall and restart Docker before the firewall on the system will be okay. If you do not the rules will not be created."

"It could be easier to create images and save them on reports. Just improved development workflow, just quicker, like some better user experience creating the images for the Docker containers."

More Docker cons

"While Rancher Labs provides some level of security, it's not considered very robust."

"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."

"If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool."

"Could be more intuitive."

"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."

"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."

"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."

"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."

More Rancher Labs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution offers an open-source version that is free and includes a lot of functionality."

"It's free."

"Its convenience edition is free of cost."

"Docker has made some changes and there is an enterprise version that is affordable."

"Docker is a free open-source solution."

"I use the solution's open-source version."

"The product is not expensive."

"Docker is open source. To use a Docker enterprise model, we would need to pay for it."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution sits in the mid range, not high and not low. It has a fixed price that you pay every month."

"Although Rancher Labs is an open-source solution, they also offer a paid version, where you buy the support when needed."

"The cost is reasonable since it's open source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge."

"The solution is free and open source but there is a fee for support."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."

"There is an annual subscription. The price of the solution should be cheaper and have better pricing flexibility."

"There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

I consider Docker's pricing to be affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Docker?

In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rancher Labs?

The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rancher Labs?

The cost is reasonable since it's open-source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rancher Labs?

While Rancher Labs provides some level of security, it's not considered very robust. We found it to offer basic security features, which met some of our requirements, but we also relied on other op...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 28% of the time

Mirantis Container Runtime vs Docker

Compared 14% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 13% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Docker

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) vs Docker

Compared 6% of the time

More Docker Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Rancher Labs

Compared 36% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Rancher Labs

Compared 9% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Rancher Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Rancher Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Portainer vs Rancher Labs

Compared 5% of the time

More Rancher Labs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Docker

March 2025

Download Docker product report

Buyer's Guide

Rancher Labs

March 2025

Download Rancher Labs product report

Overview

Docker is a versatile container platform used for running and deploying applications in isolated environments, ensuring consistency across development, testing, and production.

Docker offers solutions for containerizing applications, automating deployments, and managing infrastructure through its robust platform. It supports CI/CD workflows, provides a development platform for container management, and simplifies the setup by using streamlined tools. Organizations leverage Docker for building microservices, running UI applications, deploying web services, and setting up secure environments. It also facilitates managing containers via Kubernetes and creating development stacks for enhanced productivity.

What are Docker's key features?

Security: Offers containment and isolation of applications.
Easy Use: Simplifies the deployment and management of applications.
Documentation: Extensive resources to aid in understanding and implementation.
Customization: Flexible environment configurations.
Scalability: Efficiently handles applications irrespective of scale.
Internal DNS: Manages network configurations within the container ecosystem.
Overlay Networks: Facilitates seamless inter-container communication.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes usage of system resources.

What benefits should users look for?

Consistency: Ensures homogeneous environments across development, testing, and production stages.
Portability: Allows applications to run consistently on any platform.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces overhead costs associated with application deployment.
Speed: Accelerates the build, test, and deployment cycles.
Flexibility: Supports various tools and integrations to adapt to different workflows.

Industries implement Docker for CI/CD pipelines, scaling services, and improving resource utilization. Tech companies use Docker for building and deploying their software in isolated environments. Finance and healthcare sectors deploy applications securely, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. Educational institutions set up consistent development environments for coding labs and training students in advanced technologies.

Docker

Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

Rancher Labs

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson

Buyer's Guide

Docker vs. Rancher Labs

March 2025

Free Report: Docker vs. Rancher Labs

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Rancher Labs and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Docker vs. Rancher Labs report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.