No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

EclecticIQ vs Mandiant Advantage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EclecticIQ
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (38th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (82nd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (31st)
Mandiant Advantage
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (28th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. EclecticIQ is designed for Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
Mandiant Advantage, on the other hand, focuses on Extended Detection and Response (XDR), holds 1.3% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
EclecticIQ0.9%
Recorded Future7.1%
CrowdStrike Falcon4.8%
Other87.2%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Mandiant Advantage1.3%
CrowdStrike Falcon9.4%
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint5.9%
Other83.4%
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Use EclecticIQ?
Leave a review
LF
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
Brand threats have been monitored proactively and intelligence now drives daily security decisions
I am an end user of Mandiant Advantage. Mandiant Advantage's intelligence is good, and their service is good, but the price they charge is just too high. It's not that they're not supplying what they're selling; it's simply that the price is high, and putting a tag on that cost is somewhat problematic. I would rate Mandiant Advantage an 8 out of 10. I do not consider Mandiant Advantage an affordable solution at all. The prices are very high and very expensive. The price of Mandiant Advantage is not justified. It's really expensive, and it's so expensive that I'm not sure I will continue next year with their service.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Mandiant Advantage?
I think Mandiant Advantage could be improved regarding their intelligence on fraud and cybercrime. Additionally, their platform should be better. Mandiant Advantage's platform itself is not good ye...
What is your primary use case for Mandiant Advantage?
I'm using Mandiant Advantage for digital monitoring of our brand protection and our digital entities, in addition to tracking APT groups, cybercrime groups, and some other threat actors. I use it f...
What advice do you have for others considering Mandiant Advantage?
I am an end user of Mandiant Advantage. Mandiant Advantage's intelligence is good, and their service is good, but the price they charge is just too high. It's not that they're not supplying what th...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Mandiant Threat Intelligence
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cambridge Intelligence
Stater Bros. Markets, Rush Copley, Blackboat, CapWealth
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP). Updated: May 2026.
896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.