Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Search vs Microsoft FAST comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search
Ranking in Indexing and Search
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (9th), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (3rd)
Microsoft FAST
Ranking in Indexing and Search
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Elastic Search is 20.4%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft FAST is 6.2%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Elastic Search20.4%
Microsoft FAST6.2%
Other73.4%
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

Louis McCoy - PeerSpot reviewer
Searches through billions of documents have become impressively fast and consistent
The seamless scalability is something I see as among the best features Elastic Search offers. The speed with which Elastic Search is able to search through all of the documents we place into it is quite remarkable, as we search through 65 billion documents in less than a second in most cases, on a constant consistent basis. I find configuring relevant searches within Elastic Search platform very straightforward. Elastic Search is easily scalable. The customer support for Elastic Search is quite good. I advise others looking into using Elastic Search to think about the future of your platform and where you intend it to be in five years, and based on that, which version of Elastic Search best suits the needs of your platform. Additionally, jump into the AI products first as you're in the planning phase so that as you're filling out your data, the AI products and machine learning products can enrich the data real-time early on in the process, which will save you a lot of time later. The overall performance of the platform, scalability of the platform and other additional features, especially when it comes to AI, really earn the nine.
reviewer1466883 - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust solution with good value
Microsoft FAST is quite robust. Our clients are quite happy with it. For other users who already have a solution in place, we recommend Microsoft FAST because it is more compatible and you can organize the solution with Microsoft components. If you are with any other third party, there could be a chance that the required output is not what you would expect. But with Microsoft, it will work better. It is compatible with the older generation systems, so you can offer it. On a scale of one to ten, I would give Microsoft FAST an eight because I'm quite comfortable with it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is the analytics that we can configure and view using Kibana."
"It is easy to scale with the cluster node model.​"
"Elastic Search is very quick when handling a large volume of data."
"I really like the visualization that you can do within it. That's really handy. Product-wise, it is a very good and stable product."
"I am impressed with the product's Logstash. The tool is fast and customizable. You can build beautiful dashboards with it. It is useful and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its utility and usefulness."
"The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension."
"The special text processing features in this solution are very important for me."
"Microsoft FAST is quite robust. Our clients are quite happy with it."
 

Cons

"I would like to be able to do correlations between multiple indexes."
"We'd like to see more integration in the future, especially around service desks or other ITSM tools."
"Kibana should be more friendly, especially when building dashboards."
"Elasticsearch could be improved in terms of scalability."
"The solution's integration and configuration are not easy. Not many people know exactly what to do."
"Machine learning on search needs improvement."
"Scalability and ROI are the areas they have to improve."
"Elasticsearch should have simpler commands for window filtering."
"If there is any change in a system or a configuration or an update, we might face some issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the Community Edition because Elasticsearch's licensing model is not flexible or suitable for us. They ask for an annual subscription. We also got the development consultancy from Elasticsearch for 60 days or something like that, but they were just trying to do the same trick. That's why we didn't purchase it. We are just using the Community Edition."
"The solution is less expensive than Stackdriver and Grafana."
"The solution is affordable."
"The solution is free."
"An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
"Although the ELK Elasticsearch software is open-source, we buy the hardware."
"The solution is not expensive because users have the option of choosing the managed or the subscription model."
"There is a free version, and there is also a hosted version for which you have to pay. We're currently using the free version. If things go well, we might go for the paid version."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise36
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
We used the open-source version of Elasticsearch, which was free.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
Elastic Search could improve in areas such as search criteria and query processes, as search times were longer prior to implementing Elastic Search. Elastic Search has limitations for handling huge...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
MS FAST
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Moffitt Cancer Center, Hitachi Solutions, Manupatra Information Solutions, Unique World, _KODA AUTO a.s., MindTree Ltd, Mississippi Department of Transportation
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. Microsoft FAST and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.