Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infrrd OCR vs epiplex Automation Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

epiplex Automation Studio
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (35th)
Infrrd OCR
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions, they serve different purposes. epiplex Automation Studio is designed for Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Infrrd OCR, on the other hand, focuses on Intelligent Document Processing (IDP), holds 1.7% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
epiplex Automation Studio1.2%
UiPath Platform12.5%
Microsoft Power Automate10.3%
Other76.0%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infrrd OCR1.7%
UiPath IXP6.6%
ABBYY Vantage6.2%
Other85.5%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

EpiGenie RPA, Epiance Robotic Process Automation, ERPA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Siemens, Fidelity, Fujitsu, Barclays, Hilton Hotels and Resorts, Hess, Accenture, HP, MetLife, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Samsung, Vodafone, Volkswagen, Tata Consultancy Services
GE, Levi's, Staples
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.