Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Evanios vs Moogsoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.1
Evanios improved event visibility, reduced IT hours, increased system reliability, and provided over 100% ROI with up to 90% noise reduction.
Sentiment score
7.3
Users report reduced incident resolution time, improved alert management, cost savings, faster troubleshooting, enhanced collaboration, and quicker root cause analyses.
ROI depends on how we integrate our IT operations with Moogsoft, as it can reduce our workload, downtime, and resolution time effectively, ultimately delivering better solutions based on mean time to resolution.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.9
Evanios offers exceptional customer service and technical support, known for rapid, knowledgeable assistance and a proactive, friendly approach.
Sentiment score
6.4
Moogsoft support is efficient for some, but others experience delays; improvements noted post-acquisition with still some room for better coverage.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Evanios is highly scalable, effectively handling diverse applications through flexible rules and configurations despite occasional bottlenecks.
Sentiment score
7.5
Moogsoft offers scalable cloud-based solutions with efficient device handling and flexible pricing, despite requiring coding for integrations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Users praise Evanios for its stability and reliability, marking significant improvement over previous platforms with no reported issues.
Sentiment score
7.4
Moogsoft is reliable, stable, handles high loads efficiently, and requires minimal maintenance, with resolved earlier stability issues.
Sometimes Moogsoft experiences stability issues due to bugs or internal problems, leading to downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

Evanios needs better alert management, integration, and cost efficiency, leading users to consider alternatives like PagerDuty for added features.
Moogsoft needs better integration, analytical capabilities, user support, and improved dashboard features for enhanced incident management and automation.
Introducing machine learning and AI features would enhance Moogsoft, streamlining IT operations, incident detection, and response management.
 

Setup Cost

Moogsoft offers flexible pricing with SaaS and on-premise options, though costs may vary based on usage and model.
 

Valuable Features

Evanios offers powerful, flexible event processing with seamless ServiceNow integration, user-friendly rule types, and adaptable JavaScript manipulation.
Moogsoft integrates with 50+ IT tools, enhancing incident management with AI-driven features for improved diagnostics and system uptime.
Moogsoft offers various benefits, including incident response, reduced noise alert fatigue, increased availability and uptime, helping companies gain a better understanding of their IT environment, proactively addressing issues, and improving services.
 

Categories and Ranking

Evanios
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
65th
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
18th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (17th)
Moogsoft
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
18th
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AIOps (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Moogsoft is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Customizable solution that provides the ability to ingest alerts from different systems
The price could be cheaper. That was one reason why we switched to PagerDuty. We wanted to switch to something that provided the same features but at a lower cost. We also switched because PagerDuty provided other features like integration with ServiceNow and the scheduling of engineers. Evanios was only for event integration. Evanios created too much noise. For every alert, it would create an incident. We received too many alerts and incidents from monitoring. It wasn't able to intelligently ingest alerts. It created 4,000 incident tickets in a month, which didn't reflect what was happening. If we received an alert, the synthetic monitoring and volume drop would give us the same alert. Evanios should include alert ingestion and de-duplication of alerts and noise reduction. We couldn't have people resolving each and every incident. PagerDuty gives us reports on how many alerts are being ingested, how many are noise, how many have bigger incidents, and which of the alerts are creating noise. It would be helpful if Evanios had metrics on the amount of alerts and types of the alerts to show which ones were serious incidents and which ones were just noise.
Siddharth_Jain - PeerSpot reviewer
Filters the noise and consolidating alerts into a single situation report
Moogsoft's integration options are somewhat limited. It primarily relies on webhooks and APIs for data input, meaning external systems must push data to Moogsoft; it cannot pull data independently. If I want to connect CloudWatch or Prometheus to Moogsoft, I have to write custom code on the Prometheus side to send data through Moogsoft’s APIs or webhooks. Other monitoring tools like Splunk and Dynatrace typically have agents that reside on the system, automatically collecting and sending data. This difference can create challenges for teams needing seamless integration. Although Moogsoft has developed some plugins, such as those for Grafana and Zabbix, that are ready to use, they don’t have comprehensive support for every tool. Splunk has developed an AI assistant that can answer your queries and everything else. Moogsoft lacks that. Dynatrace has this AI component that will identify things on its own. On the other end, Moogsoft, you must set up the workflow. You have to come and set up the cookbooks. ServiceNow also has good event correlation. Splunk is fantastic with the event correlation.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Transportation Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Moogsoft?
Incident management is streamlined with Moogsoft. One standout feature is its unique situation-creation capability, differentiating it from other fault management tools. While other tools typically...
What needs improvement with Moogsoft?
We can improve Moogsoft by optimizing its noise feature, normalizing events, customizing deduplication rules, enhancing correlation accuracy, and improving incident response and automation. Introdu...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
RetailNext
Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. Moogsoft and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.