

Tufin Orchestration Suite and FireMon Security Manager are competing products in the realm of security management solutions. Tufin holds the advantage in automation, which can streamline audits and reporting processes, although FireMon supports a wider range of devices and vendors, making it versatile in diverse infrastructure environments.
Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite provides modules such as SecureTrack and SecureChange for policy tracking and change management. Its audit capabilities, risk analysis, and policy optimization enhance its visibility across multiple firewall vendors. FireMon excels with proactive security management offering robust policy analysis and compliance checks, supported by its Risk Analyzer and Security Manager modules, allowing for effective security posture assessments across varied environments.
Room for Improvement: Tufin could improve its cloud feature integrations and extend support to more vendor devices. Enhancing the user interface, reporting functionalities, and resolution speed of support would also be beneficial. FireMon could expand device support for Layer 3, enhance automation for firewall rule implementations, and make its reporting features more intuitive and customizable for user needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin is commended for its straightforward on-premises deployment and has a responsive technical team praised for expertise. FireMon supports both on-premises and public cloud environments, offering more flexible hybrid integrations. Both companies have solid customer service, with Tufin slightly excelling in technical proficiency and direct support escalation.
Pricing and ROI: Tufin is noted for its feature-rich offering but at a higher price, which might limit its appeal to larger enterprises. Despite this, significant ROI is reported due to time savings in automated processes. FireMon is considered slightly more affordable, offering a fair balance of cost and features, with users particularly highlighting its efficiency and cost savings in manual effort and audit risk reduction.
After implementing FireMon Security Manager, policy risk reports, compliance reports, and anomalies are generated automatically, which reduces audit preparation down to 15 to 18 hours per cycle, saving about 40 to 50% of time just on audit-related efforts.
It significantly reduced the time spent on manual firewall policy review and audit preparation.
The Orchestration Suite saves time when implementing rules.
An eight signifies they are doing a good job.
The customer support for FireMon Security Manager has been outstanding in our experience.
The technical support is good, but sometimes it takes some time.
The support team is effective; they connect to the network quickly and help resolve any issues that arise.
The team is eager to help in fixing issues.
In recent years, they have stopped providing specialized engineering support.
If it can see and interpret everything correctly, it would do exactly what I want, and it would be very helpful.
It offers extensive scalability options, providing more flexibility than other vendors.
As the environment grew, FireMon Security Manager continued to handle policy analysis, reporting, and change tracking reliably without performance issues.
We have not experienced any major crashes, data losses, or serious outages.
If we have many devices added or if the firewall complexity is huge, we might experience some lag in processing.
FireMon can see everything much better and provides me with a fuller report when using Meraki as a firewall system.
Simplifying some workflows and dashboards would help teams get value more quickly, especially in large environments.
A basic understanding of cloud computing and firewall principles is necessary for successful implementation.
Issues can arise in larger enterprises, particularly concerning policy-based forwarding and NAT traffic.
The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand.
The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files.
Comparatively, FireMon has a very good price and is below the general competition in cost.
Compared to others, it is not so expensive.
Our experience with FireMon Security Manager's pricing and licensing is that it is on the higher side, but justified for a large, regulated environment.
The pricing of Orchestration Suite is high, which is a point for improvement.
FireMon and Skybox are considered more cost-effective.
Tufin and AlgoSec are at the same level in terms of pricing.
By eliminating loopholes between policies, it simplifies review and analysis, while also automating policy changes and supporting multiple vendors.
It provides a single view across all firewalls, helps quickly identify risks and unused rules, and generates audit-ready reports, which is extremely useful in large, regulated environments.
The risk and rule analysis feature highlights risky, unused, shadow, duplicate, and overly permissive rules automatically, saving huge time on manual audits and helping reduce the attack surface.
AlgoSec adds more value with its vulnerability control, which benefits organizations by reducing expenses associated with audits.
New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical layout within a short period.
It offers automation capabilities that are very helpful, especially for network security orchestration and applying policies.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tufin Orchestration Suite | 20.2% |
| FireMon Security Manager | 17.9% |
| Other | 61.900000000000006% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 152 |
The increasing complexity of networks, driven by the constant influx of new devices, applications, and cloud services, presents a daunting challenge for managing firewall policies and rules. A typical enterprise environment has millions of rules, and just one simple misconfiguration can lead to devastating consequences like compliance violations, outages, and data breaches.
FireMon’s Security Manager is a purpose-built network security policy management (NSPM) platform that automates the management of firewall and cloud security policies to eliminate policy-related risk, accurately and quickly change rules, and meet internal and external compliance requirements.
Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.