OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while JetBrains is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. OpenText holds a 6.4% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

OpenText Static Application...

Read 19 OpenText Static Application Security Testing reviews

4,557 Views
1,367 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Read 14 PyCharm reviews

712 Views
712 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Static Application...

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Static Application Security Testing and PyCharm compete in the software development tools market. PyCharm leads for individual developers due to its usability and pricing, while OpenText offers superior security features for enterprises.

Features: OpenText provides extensive integration capabilities for seamless code scanning, consistent updates to maintain secure code, and support for multiple development environments. PyCharm is known for its integrated coding support features, GitHub integration, and a wide range of plugins, enhancing Python development and coding productivity.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to enhance language support, reduce noise in static code analysis, and incorporate modern infrastructure capabilities such as container scanning. PyCharm could benefit from performance optimizations to reduce memory usage and loading time, better integration with workflow products, and expanded language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers versatile on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options but faces challenges in user support responsiveness. PyCharm primarily uses on-premises deployment and is generally reliable with positively-rated support, though users desire improvements in the support experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is costly, with high licensing fees suitable for enterprises but yields significant ROI in vulnerability identification. PyCharm offers a free community edition and a competitively priced professional edition, accessible for individuals and small businesses, providing good value for its development features.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Static Application...

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of OpenText Static Application Security Testing is 6.4%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 2.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing	6.4%
PyCharm	2.1%
Other	91.5%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Dristi Kurre

Lead Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Focuses on detailed scans to find critical vulnerabilities while ensuring minimal false positives

I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less than the current latest version. It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them. While it includes all the OWASP top factors, AI has come into the picture, so those updates should also be considered. I haven't thought much about additional features for improvement since I am using it daily. Most of our work revolves around scanning and providing the results, which sometimes feels like a crunch. However, I believe rule pack updates should be implemented. It feels easy to upgrade to the latest version as well.

Read full review

Elio_Bonazzi

Senior Consultant at Mark Gurry & Associates

Seamless integration streamlines tasks and boosts productivity with efficient task handling

PyCharm's utility supports various Python frameworks such as Django and Flask for development projects. Uvicorn is well supported in project creation. Users can choose which framework to create and it handles all the code scaffolding automatically. I use PyCharm Intelligent Code Editor for context-aware code completion, and I also use the new AI extensions that JetBrains provided recently. I find it particularly useful in code refactoring. It saves me time on boilerplate code, such as interaction with the database. I can ask the AI facility in PyCharm to create all the boilerplate code for various databases. I don't write boilerplate code for mundane tasks anymore and focus on the business logic rather than the usual ancillary functions such as collecting records from the database or making network calls. This type of work is all done by AI.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are satisfied with this solution."

"I recommend this product due to its good pricing, extensive language support, valuable features, and additional features like Fortify Academy."

"Automating the Jenkins plugins and the build title is a big plus."

"We write software, and therefore, the most valuable aspect for us is basically the code analysis part."

"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."

"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."

"You can really see what's happening after you've developed something."

"We've found the documentation to be very good."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing pros

"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."

"PyCharm is saving me time and money in general."

"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."

"The solution has a great debugging feature."

"We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries."

"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

"PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."

"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."

More PyCharm pros

Cons

"It can be tricky if you want to exclude some files from scanning. For instance, if you do not want to scan and push testing files to Fortify Software Security Center, that is tricky with some IDEs, such as IntelliJ. We found that there is an Exclude feature that is not working. We reported that to them for future fixing. It needs some work on the plugins to make them consistent across IDEs and make them easier."

"I know the areas that they are trying to improve on. They've been getting feedback for several years. There are two main points. The first thing is keeping current with static code languages. I know it is difficult because code languages pop up all the time or there are new variants, but it is something that Fortify needs to put a better focus on. They need to keep current with their language support. The second thing is a philosophical issue, and I don't know if they'll ever change it. They've done a decent job of putting tools in place to mitigate things, but static code analysis is inherently noisy. If you just take a tool out of the box and run a scan, you're going to get a lot of results back, and not all of those results are interesting or important, which is different for every organization. Currently, we get four to five errors on the side of tagging, and it notifies you of every tiny inconsistency. If the tool sees something that it doesn't know, it flags, which becomes work that has to be done afterward. Clients don't typically like it. There has got to be a way of prioritizing. There are a ton of filter options within Fortify, but the problem is that you've got to go through the crazy noisy scan once before you know which filters you need to put in place to get to the interesting stuff. I keep hearing from their product team that they're working on a way to do container or docker scanning. That's a huge market mover. A lot of people are interested in that right now, and it is relevant. That is definitely something that I'd love to see in the next version or two."

"The product shows false positives for Python applications."

"The pricing is a bit high."

"It comes with a hefty licensing fee."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer is a good solution, but sometimes we receive false positives. If they could reduce the number of false positives it would be good."

"The troubleshooting capabilities of this solution could be improved. This would reduce the number of cases that users have to submit."

"Their licensing is expensive."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing cons

"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."

"Notebooks in PyCharm is not as intuitive as it could be."

"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."

"Customizing the tool can make it complicated."

"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."

"The navigation can be better."

"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."

"They should improve the product's interactiveness."

More PyCharm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"The price is reasonable."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"The community edition is free, which is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Performing Arts

15%

University

14%

Marketing Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good. We have the scan machines, and we are planning to request more from Micro Focus now. We have calls every month or every oth...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

See all answers

What do you like most about PyCharm?

The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

The breakpoints could be improved as they are not that intuitive to use.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

I use PyCharm for work, specifically for coding.

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck SCA vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 23% of the time

Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Codacy vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

January 2026

OpenText Static Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Static Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

January 2026

Download PyCharm product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

No data available

Overview

OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.

What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?

Seamless IDE Integration: Integrates effortlessly with development environments for real-time feedback.
Comprehensive Language Support: Covers a wide range of programming languages, enhancing detection accuracy.
Centralized Security Portal: Provides a streamlined interface for managing vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Identifies vulnerabilities early, preventing potential breaches.
Time Efficiency: Automates processes and speeds up remediation efforts.
Compliance Facilitation: Assists in adhering to security standards and regulations.

Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.

OpenText

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.