FreeNAS vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ comparison

FreeNAS and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the NAS category. FreeNAS is ranked #14, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. FreeNAS holds a 3.7% mindshare in N, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FreeNAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

FreeNAS

Read 9 FreeNAS reviews

1,622 Views
1,622 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

13,652 Views
3,413 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

FreeNAS

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and FreeNAS compete in the storage solutions category. HPE 3PAR StoreServ holds the upper hand due to its enterprise-grade features and strong customer support, though FreeNAS is more cost-effective, attracting smaller operations.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers all-flash arrays, remote copy functionality, and ease of use with deduplication and compression. FreeNAS excels in dynamic disk management and supports integrated services like SMB and S3, though it lacks some advanced enterprise features.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR StoreServ could improve its cloud integration and automation, focusing on better InfoSight functionality and documentation clarity. FreeNAS could enhance clustering capabilities and provide better documentation, especially for technical issues and backup operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is deployed on-premises with strong technical support, though response times vary. FreeNAS is deployed on-premises and in private clouds, appreciated for its simplicity and open-source nature but lacks robust professional support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a premium option with higher costs covering licensing and maintenance, offering good ROI through performance and reliability. FreeNAS, being open-source, primarily incurs hardware costs, appealing to those prioritizing cost-efficiency over advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FreeNAS

Ranking in NAS

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of FreeNAS is 3.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 4.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	4.3%
FreeNAS	3.7%
Other	92.0%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vincenzo D'Aniello

Software developer at TREXON S.R.L.

Open-source with great disk management and task synchronization

The system itself allows you to add any feature. The only bad thing is that this maybe depends on FreeBSD, and sometimes finding documentation is difficult. For example, we knew that previous versions automatically enabled the Linux kernel, yet with the recent version, this was no longer the case. Now, there was the possibility of being able to create Debian-based jails, and finding the documentation was not easy or fast. That said, in the end, we succeeded. If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented.

Read full review

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability is quite good; our system is in production and we have not had any problems with it, and when a drive fails, we don't really have any disruption because we can easily rebuild the disk, even if it is very large."

"It integrates well into either Windows or Linux environments."

"FreeNAS is much simpler and easier to use than other solutions, but we don't have the complete range of features that come with the full version."

"The solution has been very stable so far."

"The fact that no data are lost when a hard drive fails is extremely reassuring, as I have had two of five drives fail at one time and no data were lost."

"The ease of use of the 'jail', the management of backups, and copies to easily create test and pre-production scenarios have speeded up the development and distribution of business apps."

"What I like about it is that I can work on it from any computer or any device. The initial setup is very simple. The setup wizard is really helpful."

"It has the best storage capacity."

More FreeNAS pros

"The solution is fast."

"It has not failed us yet, so it is very highly available and error free, so far."

"It provides very fast deployment. The performance for our most critical applications is very quick."

"We have achieved all the goals we've set out to attempt, so I can say with some confidence that it is a carrier grade class piece of storage and from the point where we put it in we've run without fault, without outage and we're very pleased with them at the moment."

"Whether you are new to storage or advanced, this is the most amazing piece of hardware I have ever had my hands on, built, and used."

"If there is a problem then the HPE facility will detect it and immediately contact me."

"With the HPE GreenLake Flex Capacity, we can grow as required."

"It is incredibly easy to manage; we’re getting the performance that we need, we plug it in and it works, and everybody forgets about it, which is what we need."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

Cons

"One of my hard drives has failed and the documentation that I've been able to find has not helped."

"Its support for Hyper-V clusters."

"Make it easier to find out how to fix things when something goes wrong."

"The latest version of the dashboard doesn't work as good as the previous version. Sometimes we change our dashboard back to the previous version because the latest version just doesn't work as good."

"The one thing that I find difficult to do which is very time-consuming is that I like to have a backup of the important files."

"The support for S3 needs to be improved."

"FreeNAS should be better prepared for clustering."

"If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented."

More FreeNAS cons

"From a personal point of view, what would interest me is a mechanism that detects file-rot, i.e. that detects whether a file or sector has become corrupt; for example, as a result of copying the sector to other locations from the original location."

"3PAR has StoreOnce and replication. I would like it if they worked together."

"We activated a new disk but it failed, it's hard to manipulate and format it."

"The technical support leaves a lot to be desired."

"I would like to have more details on alerting. It is not real granular right now. What It gives you is sort of basic, and we can't do a lot of tweaking on our own. We would like to be able to tweak some of the alerts for our team."

"The product used to be very scalable but its end of life will be in about a year so there's no point to upgrade or enhance it."

"This solution is becoming dated."

"From my point of view, the part of this product that needs improvement is the reporting."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing cost is based on the hardware capacity."

"Its price is okay. It suits our needs."

"We use the free version of the program."

"For our configuration, we pay a little bit less than €10,000 ($12,000 USD) per year."

"This is not an expensive product but every time you add capacity to it, you need to pay for re-balancing."

"It is fairly inexpensive to scale."

"HPE 3PAR StoreServ is an expensive solution."

"The cost is reasonable given that the licensing is all included once you purchase it."

"As a school, we always have low budgets. We are a nonprofit organization. We do not have too much budget, so we care about prices, discounts, and especially about the product quality. The last 16 years, we have been an HPE customer. We are very much happy with HPE products."

"We purchased the total package for approximately $60,000."

"The solution has two parts: software and hardware, and you need to buy licenses for some features."

"I have to renew support in October for the existing solution. That will cost me roughly $50,000 this year, which in the grand scheme of things, $50,000 is not that much compared to paying $850,000. However, it will be the last year that I'll be able to get direct support from HPE. Therefore, product has to be replaced in 2020."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Performing Arts

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp FAS Series vs FreeNAS

Compared 10% of the time

StarWind Storage Appliance vs FreeNAS

Compared 8% of the time

Buurst SoftNAS vs FreeNAS

Compared 8% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs FreeNAS

Compared 8% of the time

HPE StoreEasy vs FreeNAS

Compared 4% of the time

More FreeNAS Competitors

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Primera vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS

June 2026

Download FreeNAS product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

June 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Also Known As

No data available

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

Overview

FreeNAS, an open-source storage platform, offers easy setup with intuitive management for network-attached storage. It's known for stability and compatibility across Windows and Linux. FreeNAS integrates with CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI while maintaining efficient virtual machine support.

FreeNAS stands out in the realm of network-attached storage by providing robust performance with dynamic disk management and task synchronization. Its container integration enhances versatility, coupled with comprehensive storage options like CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI. Users find value in its capabilities to manage virtual machines and integrated services such as SMB and S3. A vital feature includes data protection during drive failures, maintaining compatibility with both Windows and Linux environments. However, users encounter challenges with backing up large files due to slow network speeds, fragmented documentation, and integration with PSA systems or Hyper-V clusters. Scalability and clearer guidance are areas for improvement. Despite these, FreeNAS is widely utilized for its simplicity in creating users, managing permissions, and offering privacy-focused storage, especially beneficial for organizations with significant data handling needs.

What are some of the key features of FreeNAS?

Easy Setup: Streamlined installation process with minimal technical barriers.
Stability: Reliable performance in managing storage needs.
Dynamic Disk Management: Flexible handling of storage configurations.
Task Synchronization: Efficient task management for optimized operations.
Container Integration: Supports diverse applications effortlessly.
Comprehensive Storage Options: Integrates CIFS, NFS, and iSCSI for varied storage needs.
Virtual Machine Support: Efficient management of virtual environments.
Data Protection: Ensures security during drive failures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interfaces for managing large-scale storage.
Compatibility: Seamless integration with Windows and Linux systems.
Scalability: Potential to expand storage capabilities as needs grow.
Cost Efficiency: Open-source nature reduces license expenses.
Security: Protects sensitive data in research and corporate settings.

FreeNAS is implemented across diverse industries for network-attached storage, primarily serving as a backup for massive files like video files and research data. Organizations employ it for transferring and storing large datasets, and some utilize its 'jail' services for hosting applications such as JavaEE, nodejs, and GitLab. Researchers appreciate the privacy-focused storage and interim backups offered by FreeNAS, suiting their needs for both large-scale data handling and practical application hosting.

FreeNAS

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Morroni Technologies Inc., Creative Integrations

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Buyer's Guide

FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

June 2026

Free Report: FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Find out what your peers are saying about FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FreeNAS vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.