GitGuardian Platform vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

GitGuardian and JFrog are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. GitGuardian is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while JFrog is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. GitGuardian holds a 3.3% mindshare in SSCS, compared to JFrog’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

6,392 Views
767 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

2,024 Views
162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

The GitGuardian Platform and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform are competing solutions in the DevOps ecosystem. GitGuardian stands out with a focus on security and favorable pricing, while JFrog is often seen as a superior product due to its broad feature set and comprehensive value.

Features: GitGuardian offers real-time secrets detection, incident response capabilities, and strong security layers. JFrog provides comprehensive artifact management, integration versatility, and enhanced development workflows. GitGuardian prioritizes security, whereas JFrog focuses on integration and artifact handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian supports a streamlined, cloud-native deployment with responsive customer service, making integration straightforward. JFrog's deployment is flexible, supporting both on-premises and cloud installations, accompanied by robust customer service. GitGuardian emphasizes simplicity, while JFrog offers deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian offers a cost-effective solution with quick ROI due to its security-oriented benefits. JFrog, with higher setup costs, provides significant ROI through an extensive feature set for end-to-end DevOps solutions. GitGuardian balances affordability with security benefits, whereas JFrog delivers a feature-driven value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

5th

Ranking in DevSecOps

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

14th

Ranking in DevSecOps

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 3.3%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 2.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	3.3%
JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform	2.2%
Other	94.5%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is quite a lot to like. Its user interface is fantastic, and being able to sort the incidents by whether they are valid or for a certain repository or a certain user has been very beneficial in helping investigate what has been found."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

"It enables us to identify leaks that happened in the past and remediate current leaks as they happen in near real-time. When I say "near real-time," I mean within minutes. These are industry-leading remediation timelines for credential leaks. Previously, it might have taken companies years to get credentials detected or remediated. We can do it in minutes."

"GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week."

"Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort."

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in GitGuardian on Azure DevOps. The implementation is a bit hard there. This is one of the things we requested help with. I would not say their support is not good, but they need them to improve in helping customers on that side."

"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"GitGuardian could have more detailed information on what software engineers can do. It only provides some highly generic feedback when a secret is detected. They should have outside documentation. We send this to our software engineers, who are still doing the commits. It's the wrong way to work, but they are accustomed to doing it this way. When they go into that ticket, they see a few instructions that might be confusing. If I see a leaked secret committed two years ago, it's not enough to undo that commit. I need to go in there, change all my code to utilize GitHub secrets, and go on AWS to validate my key."

"We'd like to request a new GitGuardian feature that automates user onboarding and access control for code repositories."

"Automated Jira tickets would be fantastic. At the moment, I believe we have to go in and click to create a Jira ticket. It would be nice to automate."

"If a developer commits code into their repo, it generates an alert. The alert comes into Slack, but by the time someone looks at it through the Slack alerting channel, the developer might have gone and already fixed or closed the issue. There's no sort of feedback loop to come back into the notification channel to show that it's been addressed."

"An area for improvement is the front end for incidents. The user experience in this area could be much better."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."

"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

19%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 16% of the time

GitLab vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 11% of the time

n8n vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Supply Chain Security

January 2026

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

JFrog

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

December 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors and best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.