GitLab vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

GitLab and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. GitLab holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,135 Views
2,310 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,771 Views
1,274 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the domain of software development and security. GitLab has the upper hand in pricing and customer satisfaction, while Tenable.io is preferred for its robust scanning features.

Features: GitLab is known for its integrated DevOps platform, facilitating seamless collaboration, continuous integration, and code management. Tenable.io stands out with its detailed scanning capabilities, thorough vulnerability management, and comprehensive security assessments. GitLab streamlines workflow collaboration, while Tenable.io focuses on delivering advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users seek enhanced security scanning capabilities, better vulnerability reporting, and more robust compliance checks. Tenable.io users look for improved user-friendliness, seamless integration with existing security tools, and a more intuitive interface. GitLab has room to advance its security features, while Tenable.io could work on ease of use and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is praised for easy deployment and integration into existing workflows with minimal disruption, supported by efficient customer service. Tenable.io, though more intricate to deploy, provides extensive support during setup, ensuring comprehensive assistance despite its complexity. GitLab offers smooth integration, whereas Tenable.io excels in supportive deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is commended for competitive pricing and a strong return on investment that resonates with users. Tenable.io, while being on the higher end of the pricing spectrum, justifies its cost with depth in features and security capabilities. GitLab offers a cost-effective solution, whereas Tenable.io appeals to those who prioritize extensive feature sets over cost considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

"The stability is good."

"CI/CD is valuable for me."

"It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer."

"Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install."

"In our software development lifecycle, GitLab is used as a component for code repository management. We use GitLab for several projects to handle code repositories. For other software projects, we use Bitbucket, but the use case for both is very similar."

"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."

"The scalability is good."

More GitLab pros

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"It is fully automated."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

"GitLab could add a plugin to integrate with Kubernetes stuff."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"Reporting could be improved."

"I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important."

More GitLab cons

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The pricing is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

12%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 25% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 12% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.