GitLab vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

GitLab and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. GitLab holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

3,506 Views
2,947 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,888 Views
1,470 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the domain of software development and security. GitLab has the upper hand in pricing and customer satisfaction, while Tenable.io is preferred for its robust scanning features.

Features: GitLab is known for its integrated DevOps platform, facilitating seamless collaboration, continuous integration, and code management. Tenable.io stands out with its detailed scanning capabilities, thorough vulnerability management, and comprehensive security assessments. GitLab streamlines workflow collaboration, while Tenable.io focuses on delivering advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users seek enhanced security scanning capabilities, better vulnerability reporting, and more robust compliance checks. Tenable.io users look for improved user-friendliness, seamless integration with existing security tools, and a more intuitive interface. GitLab has room to advance its security features, while Tenable.io could work on ease of use and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is praised for easy deployment and integration into existing workflows with minimal disruption, supported by efficient customer service. Tenable.io, though more intricate to deploy, provides extensive support during setup, ensuring comprehensive assistance despite its complexity. GitLab offers smooth integration, whereas Tenable.io excels in supportive deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is commended for competitive pricing and a strong return on investment that resonates with users. Tenable.io, while being on the higher end of the pricing spectrum, justifies its cost with depth in features and security capabilities. GitLab offers a cost-effective solution, whereas Tenable.io appeals to those who prioritize extensive feature sets over cost considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."

"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

"It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer."

"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."

"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."

"When a developer checks in code, it is automatically built and deployed, and automated test cases are also run. We have extensive integration with GitLab, which helps us with source code management. We run the static code analysis using SonarQube."

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

More GitLab pros

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"The solution is stable."

"It is fully automated."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers."

"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

More GitLab cons

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"The technical support needs improvement. Currently, it takes time, which might be due to the free version, but providing some level of support could encourage future purchase decisions."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"We are using the open-source version."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The pricing is okay."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 25% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 25% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 13% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

May 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

May 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.