Google Cloud vs VMware Tanzu Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Google and Broadcom are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Broadcom is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 5.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud

Read 81 Google Cloud reviews

17,331 Views
8,146 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Platform

Read 23 VMware Tanzu Platform reviews

12,672 Views
3,548 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

VMware Tanzu Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Google Cloud and VMware Tanzu Platform compete in the cloud solutions category, with Google Cloud having the upper hand due to its broader feature set and user-friendly experience. However, for enterprises already invested in VMware, Tanzu Platform's deep integration offers significant value.

Features: Google Cloud offers stability, scalability, and a user-friendly experience. Its ease of use and integration with various tools are key features. VMware Tanzu Platform is recognized for its integration with VMware products, strong Kubernetes support, and comprehensive container management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud requires enhancements in analytics, monitoring, and user onboarding. Better third-party integration and cost management insights are desired. VMware Tanzu needs improved support for non-VMware ecosystems, greater networking flexibility, and a more intuitive interface. Its cost structure also calls for more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud is primarily deployed in public cloud environments, with straightforward deployment but mixed technical support reviews. Users often rely on self-learning due to variable customer service. VMware Tanzu, commonly deployed in hybrid settings, offers a comprehensive cloud-native application approach but has a complex setup. Its structured support is considered costly for smaller enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud is cost-effective, especially with its pay-as-you-go model, although support services can be costly. It offers competitive pricing and ROI benefits when fully utilized. VMware Tanzu is more expensive, often bundled with VMware services, making it less accessible for smaller organizations. Its ROI is maximized when integrated into existing VMware infrastructure, benefiting enterprises in the VMware ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

VMware Tanzu Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (17th), Cloud Management (33rd), Development Platforms (5th), Container Management (9th), Service Mesh (8th), Agile and DevOps Services (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.9%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Platform is 4.0%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.9%
VMware Tanzu Platform	4.0%
Other	90.1%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

Has supported container-based deployments and improved infrastructure visibility through monitoring tools

Aria Operations, formerly known as VMware vRealize Operations, has been renamed to vROps. We are currently using this for monitoring purposes. For orchestration, we are using VCD to automate Telco Cloud. VCD is an automation tool, and we are also using VMware Tanzu Platform for the Kubernetes environment, alongside TKG, Tanzu Kubernetes Grid. These are also other solutions for the Tanzu Kubernetes environment. For Telco Cloud, we are using it to automate our company's operations, which is for a telecom company. We are familiar with these products, especially vCenter, ESXi, VCD, vCF, and vROps. It is very easy to integrate applications when we deploy vCenter and ESXi since we can enable vSphere with Tanzu feature. We can build namespaces and provide application developers the platform to deploy their applications on pods within containerization. We can easily manage, pull results, and create containers efficiently, making it a simple way to handle applications. We provide namespace labels for application developers, and we can manage their resources along with other aspects easily. Regarding security, we use many tools such as CDX and LDAP, AD for integrating our Kubernetes cluster with the developer teams. We can manage roles and permissions simply. It is very straightforward to integrate with EDX and other third-party tools, Active Directory, to the Kubernetes cluster, allowing easy access and management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most recently, we implemented a data science agent for querying data using natural language, beyond that, it primarily relates to the cost effectiveness of data warehouse running costs versus competitors such as Snowflake."

"The speed, security, and performance of Google Cloud are excellent."

"Google Cloud has low downtime."

"For us, the solution is very easy to use. We have the right skillsets for it."

"I find Google Cloud to be more manageable and cost-effective compared to other solutions, offering good availability and scalability."

"I have found this solution to be a quick and advanced way to run my models through."

"The solution is just simple and easy for me to configure; it's very easy to work with and navigate through, the user experience is very good, and overall it's very easy to use."

"It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage."

More Google Cloud pros

"The most valuable feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is the management functionality of the cluster life cycle. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other vendors, such as Velero for backups and Sonobuoy for compliance. Additionally, it works well in multi-cluster environments."

"We never experienced any problems with scalability."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to check the flow of all the different variants within our applications."

"The support from VMware is very good."

"The most popular feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is its graphical user interface for describing network policies on the Service Mesh, which is highly integrable with other tools commonly used in supply chains such as security."

"The most important thing about the solution is its flexibility."

"With Tanzu Mission Control, you get a total solution with only one provider."

"The most important feature of Tanzu Mission Control is its integration with the other products, especially with ESX and vSAN. This is a strong part of Tanzu Mission Control. In other solutions, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes, you can find similar features, but they don't have similar integration. With Tanzu Mission Control, you get a total solution with only one provider. You have the integration with the infrastructure, virtualization of networking, and virtualization of storage. You have a natural integration, and you don't have the problem of integrating it with different products or providers. Sometimes, different companies have good integration, but it is not always guaranteed. For example, many years ago, Cisco and VMware were good partners in networking, but when VMware started to sell ESX, the relationship was broken. This is the problem that you can face when you are using solutions from two different companies."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pros

Cons

"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."

"The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available."

"Uploading documents could be simplified."

"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved."

"For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

"In terms of Google services, providing more hypervisors would be beneficial."

"Training in new advancements, technologies, or AI would help us understand how to best use the solution."

"I think one area that could be improved in Google Cloud is the customer support. Sometimes the integration process can be a bit complex due to format errors.Also having clearer documentation or a larger support team could really help users like me understand and resolve issues more effectively."

More Google Cloud cons

"The product should support integration with Google Cloud Platform (GCP)"

"Addressing the high upfront costs could improve the product. Implementing a subscription-based model with tiered service options could make it more accessible to a broader range of customers."

"Tanzu is not yet a mature product, and it's not present in large environments."

"The solution is currently focused on VMware infrastructure and I would like to see more options made available."

"Customers have noticed a considerable price increase after VMware's acquisition by Broadcom."

"The installation of VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is very complex."

"Having a unified dashboard to manage all infrastructure, whether it involves additional IT infrastructure or modern apps, would be highly advantageous"

"This product doesn't have a GUI. In order to use it properly, I need to connect it to a new GUI or build a GUI to manage it — it's pretty difficult."

More VMware Tanzu Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as an eight."

"Pricing for Google Cloud could be improved. It would be better if it were lower."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

"The solution is cheaper than Azure."

"Compared to Azure Cloud, Google Cloud is more expensive but it is okay."

"It is not easy to calculate the price of the solution from the pricing table since they are not standard rates. However, I find the solution’s prices to be fair and reasonable."

"We use the NGO version so the cloud reasonably priced at $2 to $3 per month."

"Pricing is high compared to other solutions."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

"It is not the most expensive option, and I believe the capabilities align well with the value it provides."

"I would recommend that businesses look into the full price for their requirements. The price is high, but there are some open-source add-ons that can be used for customization while keeping costs down, although these might not be suitable for everyone."

"There are different licenses available. You have to upgrade your license if you want to scale the solution more."

"The least expensive licensing cost for VMware is around $350 per core."

"The licensing cost is expensive."

"Its pricing is very competitive. We get around 70% or 75%, sometimes even 80%, discount on the product. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"Since we were at a large data center, the price might not have been a concern for us."

"VMware Tanzu Mission Control is cheaper than Red Hat OpenShift."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	38

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Concourse for VMware Tanzu?

The least expensive licensing cost for VMware is around $350 per core. Pricing varies based on commitment and volumetric, with discounts provided for long-term commitments. VMware sells directly or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Concourse for VMware Tanzu?

The price is very high compared to other Kubernetes environments because Kubernetes is open source. We can easily work with Docker, and when we compare it with OpenShift, the price is very high. We...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Public Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Amazon AWS vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Kubernetes vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Docker vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Rancher Labs vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

September 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Platform

August 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Platform product report

Also Known As

GCP

Tanzu Application Catalog, Application Platform, Application Service, Hub, Mission Control, Service Mesh, Build Service, Concourse for VMware Tanzu

Overview

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

VMware Tanzu Platform is designed for cloud-native development and management of Kubernetes, CI/CD processes, microservices, and containerized workloads. It supports deployments both on cloud and on-premises, providing centralized management via Mission Control.

VMware Tanzu Platform offers seamless integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN, supporting centralized cluster management and lifecycle management. The platform provides a GUI for monitoring CI/CD pipelines and network policies, enhancing multi-tenancy and Day 2 operations. Users can easily manage Kubernetes clusters, monitor applications, and integrate with tools such as GitHub, GitLab, Cloud Foundry, and Azure. It ensures compliance and security for service providers, financial institutions, and businesses.

What are the key features of VMware Tanzu Platform?

Integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN: Enhances compatibility and flexibility.
Seamless Cluster Management: Centralized control over Kubernetes clusters.
CI/CD Pipelines and Network Policies: Simplifies monitoring and management.
Multi-tenancy Support: Facilitates resource sharing among multiple users.
Comprehensive Lifecycle Management: Streamlines deployment and scalability.
Observability Platform: Provides enhanced visibility and control.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in VMware Tanzu Platform reviews?

Centralized Management: Simplifies operations and reduces manual effort.
Enhanced Compliance and Security: Meets regulatory requirements.
Flexibility in Deployment: Supports both cloud and on-premises options.
Seamless Integration: Works with multiple vendors and tools.
Developer-Friendly Environment: Improves productivity and innovation.

Industries such as financial institutions, service providers, and businesses requiring rigorous compliance and security deploy VMware Tanzu Platform. These entities benefit from centralized management, streamlined DevOps processes, and integrated tools, enhancing their capabilities in cloud-native developments and containerized workloads.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

September 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.