Google Kubernetes Engine vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE comparison

Google and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Management category. Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.1, while Nutanix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.6. Google holds a 2.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Read 39 Google Kubernetes Engine reviews

1,235 Views
840 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reviews

2,824 Views
2,739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Kubernetes Engine

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Google Kubernetes Engine and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine are competitors in the Kubernetes management service category. Google Kubernetes Engine seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cloud integration and diverse deployment capabilities.

Features: Google Kubernetes Engine offers robust features such as auto-scaling, seamless integration with various cloud services, and an efficient container deployment process using managed services. It supports microservices and simplifies operations significantly. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is known for its simplicity and efficient cluster creation, allowing quick deployment and good integration with existing infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Google Kubernetes Engine needs better documentation clarity, enhanced support for advanced security features within clusters, and improved interface usability. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine requires enhancements in scalability and management capabilities and advanced functionalities like replication and recovery.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Kubernetes Engine facilitates deployment across public, hybrid, and various cloud environments, suitable for diverse needs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is efficiently deployed on-premises with minimal external support needed. While GKE's technical support requires improvements, NKE's support is generally adequate, aligning with its straightforward deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Google Kubernetes Engine provides a competitive pricing model, although it may become expensive with high-capacity requirements and regional redundancy. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine often includes existing licenses, offering cost savings for users already invested in Nutanix solutions. Both aim for positive ROI, with GKE more suitable for multi-cloud services despite slightly higher costs, while NKE's pricing is attractive for on-premises infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Kubernetes Engine

Ranking in Container Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Ranking in Container Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Google Kubernetes Engine is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is 8.2%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Parthasarathy T

Cloud Associate DevOps at Publicis Sapient

Managed solutions enable efficient handling of web applications and migration projects

Google Kubernetes Engine can be improved by enabling the in-place upgrade of the machine type of an existing node pool since I currently need to destroy and recreate it. There is no feature present where I can upgrade directly, and having more than 1,000 to 2,000 workloads in one node pool makes changing the node pool name difficult for all those workloads. I choose eight out of ten mainly because of the node pool upgrade challenge I mentioned, but also because of the existence of Anthos service mesh, which is the ingress controller available only for the enterprise Kubernetes Engine. It would be beneficial if it could be offered in the normal Kubernetes Engine with any limitations.

Read full review

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very easy. We can create our cluster using the command line, or using our console."

"We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."

"The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."

"The product has no downtime."

"I am impressed with the product's output scaling."

"The solution simplified deployment, making it more automated. Previously, Docker required manual configuration, often done by developers on their computers. However, with Google Kubernetes Engine, automation extends to configuration, deployment, scalability, and viability, primarily originating from Docker rather than Kubernetes. Its most valuable feature is the ease of configuration."

"Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) takes care of managing Kubernetes, including the main control plane. It also offers solutions for monitoring resources and handling external traffic, which is essential for us. Being a cloud-native solution, it relieves us from worrying about these operational aspects."

"The most valuable feature of Google Kubernetes Engine is how you can automatically scale and load balance."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"My experience with Nutanix's technical support is excellent."

"The technical support is excellent."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"Nutanix is very stable and reliable, based on my experience with many customers, including large banks and telcos."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the cluster updates process. Specifically, when managing both non-production and production clusters, we need a sequential functionality."

"The console for this solution could be improved because it is very limited."

"I would like the solution to integrate with another Kubernetes product. I would also like it to monitor other platforms. It needs to also include scale-up container in the tool's next release."

"The user interface is a bit confusing sometimes. You need to navigate between the various consoles we have. It's hard to figure out where things are. It's frustrating. The documentation could be a bit better."

"The management UI could be improved."

"One of the things I missed a bit is the visibility and availability of solutions. If I compare it to a different solution, it is a bit behind."

"I think that security is an important point, and there should be additional features for the evaluation of data in containers that will create a more secure environment for usage in multi-parent models."

"I have created a couple of issues with Google tech support, and I am not satisfied with the assistance I received."

More Google Kubernetes Engine cons

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"We need a backup of production clusters."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"It is competitive, and it is not expensive. It is almost competitive with AWS and the rest of the cloud solutions. We are spending around 3K USD per month. There are four projects that are currently running, and each one is incurring a cost of around 3K USD."

"Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."

"Currently, it costs around $1000 per month which sorted our deployment. So once we get more clients, having a huge suffix, costs can go up."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pricing and cost advice

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Kubernetes Engine?

The product has no downtime.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes Engine?

Google Kubernetes Engine solution is expensive, as are all cloud solutions in general. On a scale of one to ten for pricing, I would rate it between seven and eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?

I have no comment about the learning curve of Google Kubernetes Engine. Regarding AI integration and features in Google Kubernetes Engine, there are currently none available. I would appreciate see...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have been working with the Nutanix Kubernetes platform for the past five years. Currently, I am supporting JetBlue Airlines in America, which uses a Nutanix environment and Nutanix Kubernetes Eng...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 24% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 13% of the time

Docker vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 13% of the time

Illumio vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Kubernetes Engine Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 31% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 19% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 17% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 10% of the time

Portainer vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 2% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Kubernetes Engine

August 2025

Download Google Kubernetes Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

August 2025

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE product report

Also Known As

GKE

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

Google

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Buyer's Guide

Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

July 2025

Free Report: Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.