Graylog vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Graylog and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. Graylog is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.3. Graylog holds a 6.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Graylog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 69% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Graylog

Read 21 Graylog reviews

9,558 Views
8,433 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 16 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

2,144 Views
1,533 Comparison Views

69% willing to recommend

Graylog

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog compete in the log management and security analytics category. Graylog seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced query and visualization capabilities.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers user-friendly administration, comprehensive auditing, and supports multiple log formats. Graylog provides advanced search functionality, customizable dashboards, and superior data analysis capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could enhance its reporting capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and update processes. Graylog faces challenges with scalability, alerting functions, and could also benefit from more seamless updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Graylog, though more challenging to set up, benefits from community support and thorough documentation, appealing to users who prefer deep customization.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 offers competitive pricing suitable for mid-sized organizations. Graylog, while potentially incurring higher setup costs, is valued for its extensive analytics and scalability, worthwhile for users needing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Graylog

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (19th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Graylog is 6.7%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Ivan Kokalovic

DevOps Engineer at Proton Technologies

Facilitates backend service monitoring with efficient log retrieval and API flexibility

Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline. It boosts the knowledge of sales and customer support teams by allowing them to see the backend operations without needing to read the code. Its API is flexible for visualization, and its powerful search engine efficiently handles large volumes of log data. Moreover, its stability, fast search capabilities, and compatibility with languages like ANSI SQL enhance its utility in IT infrastructure.

Read full review

Julio Cesar De Faria Junior

IT Security Admin at MeedBr

Real-time security management with potential for enhanced training materials

I use ManageEngine Log360 to manage company alerts. It is used in the security part, looking for issues in Active Directory and performing various tasks in Office 365 Using ManageEngine Log360 has been a significant improvement for our company because it consolidates multiple tools into a single…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is scalable. The solution is stable."

"UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, perfect for sending large volumes of logs with minimal overhead."

"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."

"Message forwarding through the in-built module."

"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."

"The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm."

"This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them."

"Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching."

More Graylog pros

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."

"The reports that you can run are really nice."

"It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."

"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."

"It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"We haven't had any stability issues."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"Since container orchestration systems are popular and Graylog fits the niche well, perhaps they could officially support running in docker containers on Kubernetes as a StatefulSet as a use case. That way, the declarative nature of Kubernetes config files would document their best case deployment scenario-"

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."

"The infrastructure cost is the main issue. I like the rest. If the infrastructure costs could be lower, it would be fantastic."

"When it comes to configuring the processing pipeline, writing the rules can be very tedious, especially since the documentation isn't extensive on how the functions provided for these rules work."

More Graylog cons

"The support needs improvement."

"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."

"The solution lacks some features when compared to other products."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."

"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."

"The solution needs to improve hub storage. It should integrate AI and ML capabilities."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"We're using the Community edition."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

More Graylog pricing and cost advice

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Educational Organization

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Log360?

The product is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The cost is medium. It is not very expensive and not very cheap. It seems to be a good price for the range of tools it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Graylog

Compared 39% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog

Compared 24% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog

Compared 11% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog

Compared 5% of the time

Seq vs Graylog

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 22% of the time

Wazuh vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 8% of the time

syslog-ng vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 2% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Graylog

May 2025

Download Graylog product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

May 2025

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Also Known As

Graylog2

No data available

Overview

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

Considerably faster analysis speeds.
More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
Lower cost than alternatives.
Full-scale customer service.
No expensive training or tool experts required.

Graylog

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

April 2025

Free Report: Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.