Hillstone Cloud Sandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Hillstone Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Hillstone Networks is ranked #36, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8. Hillstone Networks holds a 0.9% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution.

Hillstone Cloud Sandbox

Read 1 Hillstone Cloud Sandbox review

302 Views
275 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

2,454 Views
1,227 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Hillstone Cloud Sandbox

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hillstone Cloud Sandbox and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hillstone Cloud Sandbox

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

36th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Hillstone Cloud Sandbox is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 3.6%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response	3.6%
Hillstone Cloud Sandbox	0.9%
Other	95.5%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Albert-Wang

Technical Consultant at SiS Technologies

Dynamic file analysis enhances threat detection capabilities

Cloud sandbox allows customers to analyze email and text documents without purchasing any hardware. The system analyzes files dynamically and provides feedback on the impact of the file. Cloud sandbox manages the analysis using Hillstone on the cloud, offering a service to detect unknown threats. It's easy to integrate and offers dynamic analysis supporting many types of files.

Read full review

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud sandbox allows customers to analyze email and text documents without purchasing any hardware."

"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."

"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."

"The server appliance is good."

"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"Trellix NDR provides an essential defense by automatically responding to network incidents that firewalls may not catch."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall, and if you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"For implementation, if the system can improve or provide more training, it would be better."

"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."

"Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use."

"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."

"It is an expensive solution."

"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."

"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."

"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."

"Technical support could be improved."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"The pricing is a little high."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hillstone Cloud Sandbox?

The pricing is competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hillstone Cloud Sandbox?

For implementation, if the system can improve or provide more training, it would be better. Additionally, for scalability, the performance does not have challenges, as users generally don't upload ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hillstone Cloud Sandbox?

Cloud them both is a very feature and it is used to detect unknown threats by analyzing files. Customers typically use Hillstone on the cloud to do the analysis.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Hillstone Cloud Sandbox

Compared 44% of the time

More Hillstone Cloud Sandbox Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

January 2026

Download Hillstone Cloud Sandbox product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

January 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

No data available

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

To address advanced malware, the Hillstone Cloud Sandbox delivers a unique, advanced threat detection platform that can emulate the execution environment and analyze all activities related to malicious files, identify advanced threats and collaborate with existing solutions to provide rapid remediation.

The Hillstone Cloud Sandbox is comprised of three modules: Static Analysis, Behavioral Analysis and Cloud Intelligence. The three modules work together to ensure the efficiency and efficacy of malicious files detection.

Hillstone Networks

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.