Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Hitachi Vantara and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Hitachi ID Privileged Acces...

Read 1 Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 53 One Identity Safeguard reviews

4,208 Views
2,777 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Hitachi ID Privileged Acces...

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi ID Privileged Acces...

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (3rd)

Featured Reviews

Darius Radford

Principal Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Responsive support, requires little maintenance, but configuration could be easier

Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is cumbersome and it does not operate by itself and relies on other solutions. Overall the way you configure things is a bit awkward compared to other solutions, such as Cyberark and Thycotic. The interface could be more intuitive, some features I expected to be easily accessible I had to search around for them. There needs to be more centralization.

Read full review

SachinShelar

Manager, Account Services Delivery at Softcell Technologies Limited

Privileged access has become centralized and streamlines multi-client audits and compliance

The best features we can highlight are privileged password vaulting and automatic password rotation, just-in-time privileged access, and session monitoring and recording. These features together stand out because they significantly reduce credential exposure, enforce least privilege access, and provide full auditing visibility across multiple client environments, as we are a service delivery and IT service delivery company with multiple customer environments and access. We rely most on just-in-time privileged access with credential vaulting. It is easy for the team to use day-to-day because access requests and approvals are streamlined and automated. Credentials are never exposed and sessions are automatically logged. After initial setup, adoption was smooth and it fit well into our existing operational workflows without adding stress to our operational team to adapt to the new technology. One Identity Safeguard has strengthened privileged access security across our multiple client environments. We have seen a reduction in shared credentials and unauthorized access. We have also seen faster approval for admin tasks and improved audit readiness. It has streamlined compliance reporting and reduced the operational risk of managing multiple client environments manually. Implementing this solution, we have reduced privileged account-related incidents by thirty percent. We have also cut manual password management time by nearly fifty to sixty percent. Just-in-time access has sped up admin task completion and improved our overall compliance reporting, allowing audits to be completed nearly half the time compared to earlier.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you using IGA or access controls solutions then this solution is a good addon. Once Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is set up it does not require a lot of maintenance or attention."

"We deployed it into our company for controlling a client's behavior in our data center. It is very useful to control their connections, such as RDP."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network."

"We have seen a 12% return on investment with One Identity Safeguard, and we have saved a significant amount of money."

"We have removed shared admin credentials, enforced just-in-time access management, simplified audits with session recording, and reduced manual access work, all thanks to One Identity Safeguard."

"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is cumbersome and it does not operate by itself and relies on other solutions. Overall the way you configure things is a bit awkward compared to other solutions, such as Cyberark and Thycotic. The interface could be more intuitive, some features I expected to be easily accessible I had to search around for them. There needs to be more centralization."

"Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"Reporting and dashboards can be made more customized, especially for client-specific views."

"Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support."

"The main point regarding the user experience is that Safeguard has two separate management consoles."

"We should be able to create customized connectors in a better way. For ad hoc or special use cases, I sometimes find we have limitations. Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been a good experience overall, as the back and forth with One Identity is something that is acceptable; other tools have options to do thi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard could be improved with a password manager and an identity manager as one big access management system. I believe improvements could be made around integrating with other tools.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is using only one module for privileged session, which we use for admins and contractors. A quick specific example of how my team uses One Identity Safeg...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 20% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] report

Download Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

January 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager secures access to elevated privileges. It eliminates shared and static passwords to privileged accounts. It enforces strong authentication and reliable authorization prior to granting access. User access is logged, creating strong accountability.

Privileged Access Manager secures access at scale, supporting over a million password changes daily and access by thousands of authorized users. It is designed for reliability, to ensure continuous access to shared accounts and security groups, even in the event of a site-wide disaster.

Privileged Access Manager grants access to authorized users, applications and services. It can integrate with every client, server, hypervisor, guest OS, database and application, on-premise or in the cloud.

Hitachi Vantara

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.