HPE Data Fabric vs IBM Netezza Performance Server comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Hadoop category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.5% mindshare in H, compared to IBM’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Data Fabric

Read 12 HPE Data Fabric reviews

1,305 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Read 45 IBM Netezza Performance Server reviews

2,670 Views
320 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

HPE Data Fabric

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

HPE Data Fabric and IBM Netezza Performance Server are major contenders in the big data domain. While HPE Data Fabric is praised for its affordability and flexible pricing, IBM Netezza is noted for its superior performance and robust architecture.

Features: HPE Data Fabric offers a comprehensive bundled ecosystem, high security capabilities, and reliability through its MapR NFS and POSIX compliant design. IBM Netezza excels in high-speed analytics with field-programmable gate arrays, built-in analytics, and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: HPE Data Fabric needs better interoperability with third-party tools, more efficient deployment processes, and improvements in upgrade handling. IBM Netezza could enhance scalability and concurrency, and address its storage limitations with better integration with cloud solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Data Fabric predominantly operates on-premises with mixed support reviews, facing criticism for slow response times. IBM Netezza supports hybrid cloud deployment, praised for simpler setup and responsive support, although customer service experiences are variable.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Data Fabric is seen as cost-effective with flexible pricing and good ROI. IBM Netezza's pricing is higher, justified by its advanced performance in managing large data volumes for fast analytics, although it is more expensive than cloud options, underscoring the need for tailored use-case planning.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Data Fabric

Ranking in Hadoop

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Ranking in Hadoop

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of HPE Data Fabric is 13.5%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Netezza Performance Server is 6.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hadoop Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Data Fabric	13.5%
IBM Netezza Performance Server	6.2%
Other	80.3%

Hadoop

Featured Reviews

Hamid M. Hamid

Data architect at Banking Sector

A stable and scalable tool that serves as a great database

The initial setup of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is easy. I am not sure how long it took to deploy HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, but I haven't heard about any disadvantages when it comes to the time taken for the deployment. I remember that one of our company's clients who had purchased the product never mentioned the product's setup phase being complex. One of the drawbacks with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric stems from the fact that the product's upgrade was not straightforward, and it was a complex process since one of the teams in my company who deals with the tool found the upgrade part to be tough. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. My company has two dedicated staff members to look after the deployment and maintenance phases of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

Read full review

Shiv Subramaniam Koduvayur

Project Manager at MAF Retail

Parallel data processing streamlines operations while cost and cloud integration challenge adoption

The cost of the solution is on the more expensive side, which is a concern for me. Additionally, its promotion and interaction with cloud applications are limited. The cloud version is only available in AWS, and in the Middle East, it is not well-developed in the Azure environment. For the cost to be reduced, it should match competitors. Many features need to be incorporated on the cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."

"The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."

"My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."

"I like the administration part."

"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."

"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."

"Distribution concurrency control."

"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."

"Speed contributes to large capacity."

"The performance is most important to me, and it helps our ability to make business decisions quickly."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

"We are able to execute very complex queries. Over 90 percent of our query executions are one second or less. We do millions of queries everyday."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server pros

Cons

"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."

"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."

"Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work."

"The product is not user-friendly."

"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."

"The Analytics feature should be simplified."

"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."

"Our main problem with it is concurrency. When there are too many users running Netezza at the same time, this is when we have the most complaints."

"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."

"We are not able to scale. The only way to scale is to get another appliance, but we have a customers who would need us to hydrate the data between the two appliances, and Netezza does not do that."

"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."

"Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server."

"The only issue is that it's not expandable."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HPE is flexible with you if you are an existing customer. They offer different models that might be beneficial for your organization. It all depends on how you negotiate."

"The tool's price is cheap and based on a usage basis. The solution's licensing costs are yearly and there are no extra costs."

"There is a need for my company to pay for the licensing costs of the solution."

"Netezza is a costly solution. It does serve a specific purpose but it's costlier than what's available in the market, if you go to the cloud."

"For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."

"The pricing is very expensive. It has a lot CPUs with a lot of components in it. It also has built-in redundancy for resiliency reasons."

"The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support."

"Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."

"The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with IBM Netezza Performance Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Netezza Performance Server?

I use this solution as a data warehouse.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Netezza Performance Server?

The solution has generally received positive feedback from me and is recommended for continued use by end users. However, the product cost is high compared to others in the market, and this cost ha...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudera Data Platform vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 15% of the time

Apache Spark vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Spectrum Computing vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 9% of the time

SAP HANA vs HPE Data Fabric

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Data Fabric Competitors

Snowflake vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Hadoop vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Data Fabric

March 2026

Download HPE Data Fabric product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Netezza Performance Server

March 2026

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server product report

Also Known As

MapR, MapR Data Platform

Netezza Performance Server, Netezza, Netezza Analytics

Overview

Forward-leaning companies win market share because they leverage data more effectively than their competitors. Unlock the potential of your data assets with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric (formerly MapR Data Platform). Empower your data science, analytics, and business teams by simplifying data management on a globally distributed scale. All with enterprise-grade reliability, security, and performance.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM Netezza Performance Server offers high performance, scalability, and minimal maintenance. It seamlessly integrates SQL for efficient data processing, making it ideal for enterprise data warehousing needs.

IBM Netezza Performance Server is known for its outstanding data processing capabilities. Its integration of FPGA technology, compression techniques, and partitioning optimizes query execution and scalability. Users appreciate its appliance-like architecture for straightforward deployment, distributed querying, and high availability, significantly boosting operations and analytics capabilities. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in handling high concurrency, real-time integration, and specific big data functionalities. Enhancements in database management tools, XML integration, and cloud options are commonly desired, along with better marketing and community engagement.

What are the key features of IBM Netezza Performance Server?

High Performance: Offers fast query execution using advanced hardware integration.
Scalability: Designed to handle expanding data needs efficiently.
Seamless Data Loading: Enables simple and quick loading of large datasets.
ANSI-compliant SQL: Supports standardized SQL for easy integration with existing tools.
Efficient Architecture: Appliance-based for easy deployment and hands-off administration.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Minimal Maintenance: Reduces administrative overhead with reliable setup.
Comprehensive IBM Support: Provides robust problem-solving resources.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted operations and consistent performance.
Enhanced Analytics Capabilities: Drives analytics and reporting processes effectively.

Industries rely on IBM Netezza Performance Server for robust data warehousing solutions, particularly in sectors requiring intensive data analysis such as finance, retail, and telecommunications. Organizations use it to power business intelligence tools like Business Objects and MicroStrategy for customer analytics, establishing data marts and staging tables to efficiently manage and update enterprise data. With the capacity to handle large volumes of compressed and uncompressed data, it finds numerous applications in on-premises setups, powering data mining and reporting with high reliability and efficiency.

IBM

Sample Customers

Valence Health, Goodgame Studios, Pico, Terbium Labs, sovrn, Harte Hanks, Quantium, Razorsight, Novartis, Experian, Dentsu ix, Pontis Transitions, DataSong, Return Path, RAPP, HP

Seattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, Foxwoods

Buyer's Guide

HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

March 2026

Free Report: HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server report.

See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.