No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Serviceguard
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of HPE Serviceguard is 11.6%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 14.6%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Windows Server Failover Clustering14.6%
HPE Serviceguard11.6%
Other73.8%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

AH
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a Mount Point Package
They should continue with the certificate for the consequent year as well. They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static. There are a lot of challenges as well. Sometimes, the mount point gets lost depending on link failure or census problems. The solution works on a standard script, but it has many tech issues to fix with the OS. You have to keep checking network connectivity, OS connectivity, etc. If any of these fails, then you do not get the certificate.
SK
System Administrator at Confidential
A scalable solution to create clusters, and auto-assign a master
The solution has some downsides related to the election mechanism, meaning that if the servers or the cluster services or cluster server elect one server, they will attribute to that server an object that is called a quorum. This quorum does the server or the service that has that quorum, it is taken as the master. So when you have, for example, something happens in your data centers like a power outage or an unexpected shutdown, and you can't start the master server what sometimes will happen, is since the shutdown was unexpected, the cluster didn't have time to do some post configurations before the extension of the shutdown of the servers, sometimes that quorum can't be removed from the crashed master and the cluster wants stuff. This is part of the architecture of this service, the Failover service. So sometimes we face this type of problem. In the past, we had a lot of power outages and when we started after, our server, we faced this problem. Meaning that the cluster won't stop because one of the servers, the master crashed, and they didn't want to start. So we need to access and do some line configurations so that we will force the cluster to elect a new master and ignore the crashed one.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"The solution's scalability is excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
"I would recommend this solution to others, we have used it for a long time and it has been reliable."
"The failover is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"But once it is done, it will perform very well."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The reliability is pretty good."
 

Cons

"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"Technical support isn't as responsive as I'd like."
"We are currently looking for another solution because, in many industries, such as eCommerce, they operate 24 hours a day seven days a week and this solution has some downtime which our customers do not like."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is available at a high price. I rate it as a two for pricing."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
15%
Outsourcing Company
13%
University
10%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

Serviceguard, HP Serviceguard
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RI-Solution, FAW-Volkswagen, Pella, Octo Telematics, Kenya Ports Authority
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.