Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 15.7% mindshare in HAC, compared to Microsoft’s 23.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.
HPE Serviceguard
Read 2 HPE Serviceguard reviews
  • 349 Views
  • 182 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Read 8 Windows Server Failover Clustering reviews
  • 1,037 Views
  • 407 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between HPE Serviceguard and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two High Availability Clustering solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Serviceguard
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of HPE Serviceguard is 15.7%, up from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 23.7%, down from 34.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

AH
The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a Mount Point Package
They should continue with the certificate for the consequent year as well. They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static. There are a lot of challenges as well. Sometimes, the mount point gets lost depending on link failure or census problems. The solution works on a standard script, but it has many tech issues to fix with the OS. You have to keep checking network connectivity, OS connectivity, etc. If any of these fails, then you do not get the certificate.
Read full review
TA
A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy
We use the most basic features of the product We use the operation system itself. We also use it for virtualization and failover. The product is stable. The product should be less dependent on network configuration. Our technicians usually require other tools along with Failover Clustering. It…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's scalability is excellent."
"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
"The reliability is pretty good."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The product is stable."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
 

Cons

"They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static."
"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is available at a high price. I rate it as a two for pricing."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Windows Server Failover Clustering?
The product is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server Failover Clustering?
There is no extra charge except a service fee for some professional work. I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Windows Server Failover Clustering?
The solution uses external storage, while third-party solutions don't use external storage. They're using a mirror to create a partition on each server and synchronize the data in the background. I...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Veritas InfoScale Availability vs HPE Serviceguard Logo
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs HPE Serviceguard
Compared 41% of the time
DRBD vs HPE Serviceguard Logo
DRBD vs HPE Serviceguard
Compared 35% of the time
More HPE Serviceguard Competitors
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs Windows Server Failover Clustering Logo
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs Windows Server Failover Clustering
Compared 56% of the time
DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering Logo
DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering
Compared 28% of the time
More Windows Server Failover Clustering Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
High Availability Clustering
April 2025
HPE Serviceguard reportDownload HPE Serviceguard product report
Buyer's Guide
Windows Server Failover Clustering
April 2025
Windows Server Failover Clustering reportDownload Windows Server Failover Clustering product report
 

Also Known As

Serviceguard, HP Serviceguard
No data available
 

Overview

HPE Serviceguard is a high availability and disaster recovery clustering solution, that increases uptime for your critical applications by protecting from a multitude of infrastructure and application faults across physical or virtual environments over any distance. It reduces impact of unplanned downtime with no compromise on data integrity and performance. Furthermore, it helps achieve near zero planned downtime for maintenance.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

RI-Solution, FAW-Volkswagen, Pella, Octo Telematics, Kenya Ports Authority
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Buyer's Guide
HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
April 2025
Free Report: HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering report.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.