No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Serviceguard
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of HPE Serviceguard is 11.1%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 16.1%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Windows Server Failover Clustering16.1%
HPE Serviceguard11.1%
Other72.8%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

AH
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a Mount Point Package
They should continue with the certificate for the consequent year as well. They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static. There are a lot of challenges as well. Sometimes, the mount point gets lost depending on link failure or census problems. The solution works on a standard script, but it has many tech issues to fix with the OS. You have to keep checking network connectivity, OS connectivity, etc. If any of these fails, then you do not get the certificate.
TA
Engineer at Magal Solutions
A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy
We use the most basic features of the product We use the operation system itself. We also use it for virtualization and failover. The product is stable. The product should be less dependent on network configuration. Our technicians usually require other tools along with Failover Clustering. It…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"The solution's scalability is excellent."
"I would recommend this solution to others, we have used it for a long time and it has been reliable."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
"The product is stable."
"But once it is done, it will perform very well."
"The reliability is pretty good."
"The failover is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"It's scalable, highly available, and is agile to handle workloads."
 

Cons

"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"Technical support isn't as responsive as I'd like."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"We are currently looking for another solution because, in many industries, such as eCommerce, they operate 24 hours a day seven days a week and this solution has some downtime which our customers do not like."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is available at a high price. I rate it as a two for pricing."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
10%
Retailer
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
14%
University
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

Serviceguard, HP Serviceguard
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RI-Solution, FAW-Volkswagen, Pella, Octo Telematics, Kenya Ports Authority
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.