No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DRBD
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of DRBD is 13.8%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 16.1%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Windows Server Failover Clustering16.1%
DRBD13.8%
Other70.1%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

it_user302112 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant IT Infrastructure at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
It's kept data synchronized between multiple nodes in different datacenters, though it should have its own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments.
Working with DRBD can be complex and it takes time to understand how it works. Especially split-brain scenarios need to be handled carefully. When it comes to multi-master setups, which are possible with the latest DRBD version, you need to use a cluster filesystem. I think that DRBD should write their own filesystem which can be used in multi-master environments since most cluster filesystems are complex or simply have many flaws.
TA
Engineer at Magal Solutions
A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy
We use the most basic features of the product We use the operation system itself. We also use it for virtualization and failover. The product is stable. The product should be less dependent on network configuration. Our technicians usually require other tools along with Failover Clustering. It…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"DRBD helped me and many customers to provide data in an HA environment with low costs (since DRBD itself is free)."
"Business continuity is much better, due to the possibility of patching/upgrading systems without interruption of services."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The failover is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"I would recommend this solution to others, we have used it for a long time and it has been reliable."
"The reliability is pretty good."
 

Cons

"Working with DRBD can be complex and it takes time to understand how it works."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"We are currently looking for another solution because, in many industries, such as eCommerce, they operate 24 hours a day seven days a week and this solution has some downtime which our customers do not like."
"Technical support isn't as responsive as I'd like."
"The tool's pricing is high."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
14%
University
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Portland State University, Porsche Informatik, Siemens, Ericsson,T-Mobile, Addidas
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale, Microsoft, Linbit and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.