Swarm64 vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Swarm64 and Microsoft are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. Swarm64 is ranked #8, while Microsoft is ranked #2. Swarm64 holds a 5.8% mindshare in HAC, compared to Microsoft’s 17.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Swarm64

107 Views
107 Comparison Views

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Read 8 Windows Server Failover Clustering reviews

692 Views
692 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Swarm64

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Swarm64 and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale, Microsoft, FlashGrid and others in High Availability Clustering.

To learn more, read our detailed High Availability Clustering Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Swarm64

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

8th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of Swarm64 is 5.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 17.9%, down from 27.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

High Availability Clustering Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Windows Server Failover Clustering	17.9%
Swarm64	5.8%
Other	76.3%

High Availability Clustering

Featured Reviews

Use Swarm64?

Leave a review

Tal Adler

Engineer at Magal Solutions

A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy

We use the most basic features of the product We use the operation system itself. We also use it for virtualization and failover. The product is stable. The product should be less dependent on network configuration. Our technicians usually require other tools along with Failover Clustering. It…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

15%

University

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

DRBD vs Swarm64

Compared 52% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Swarm64

Compared 48% of the time

More Swarm64 Competitors

InfoScale vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 36% of the time

DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 16% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 15% of the time

DxEnterprise vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 11% of the time

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

January 2026

Download Swarm64 product report

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server Failover Clustering

January 2026

Windows Server Failover Clustering report

Download Windows Server Failover Clustering product report

Overview

Swarm64 seamlessly combines hard- and software into an engineered solution for greater business efficiency and performance. The S64DA is the out of the box solution to add analytical power to your relational databases.

Swarm64

Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor

Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale, Microsoft, FlashGrid and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.