Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

InfoScale vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 21, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (53rd), Data Storage for Kubernetes (9th)
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user281973 - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
It provides a stable SAP environment, but deployment does require someone with experience.
It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment In my last job, it provided a great SAP environment that was stable and running on Veritas Cluster. I've used it for six years. It's not so easy in some cases, and you will need some experience. There were…
TA
Engineer at Magal Solutions
A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy
We use the most basic features of the product We use the operation system itself. We also use it for virtualization and failover. The product is stable. The product should be less dependent on network configuration. Our technicians usually require other tools along with Failover Clustering. It…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It integrates well with other solutions."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The reliability is pretty good."
"The product is stable."
 

Cons

"It could be more stable and more secure."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
"The tool's pricing is high."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
15%
University
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.