You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

HPE StoreEasy vs NetApp FAS Series comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.2% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

HPE StoreEasy

Read 12 HPE StoreEasy reviews

1,783 Views
1,783 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp FAS Series

Read 110 NetApp FAS Series reviews

9,150 Views
4,575 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

NetApp FAS Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

NetApp FAS Series and HPE StoreEasy both compete in the storage solutions category, targeting performance-heavy and cost-effective environments respectively. NetApp appears to have the upper hand in advanced features, while HPE stands out for affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetApp FAS Series is noted for features like high availability, Snap technologies, and protocol flexibility. These contribute to efficient storage management and seamless virtualization integration. HPE StoreEasy, on the other hand, is recognized for its reliability, simplicity in operation, and solid storage capabilities, despite lacking some of NetApp's advanced functions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest improving documentation, simplifying performance monitoring, and reducing costs. Enhancing backward compatibility and speeding up firmware updates are also desired. HPE StoreEasy could focus on scalability, better cloud integration, and improving technical support, all essential for meeting market expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both NetApp and HPE StoreEasy excel in ease of deployment. NetApp offers hybrid cloud integration, adding flexibility, and is praised for its responsive technical support. HPE StoreEasy matches in deployment ease and receives satisfactory customer service feedback, though it could expand its support capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp is often considered expensive, with costs justified by significant ROI and storage savings due to efficiency features. HPE StoreEasy is viewed as more affordable, aligning well with budget-conscious users, and provides good value, though additional costs may occur for extra features. Both systems generally ensure meaningful ROI, with NetApp appealing to high-end needs and HPE offering budget-friendly options.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp FAS Series

Ranking in NAS

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (4th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp FAS Series is 10.6%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp FAS Series	10.6%
HPE StoreEasy	3.2%
Other	86.2%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

Srikanth Purushothaman

DIRECTOR at Vellore Online Systems

Has supported long-term data protection and backup while requiring better part availability and pricing options

For monitoring purposes, we normally use flash access storage exclusively. We utilize a hybrid system because we need performance, combining NL-SAS for the volume and SAS flash to use as a fast cache system that provides more IOPS. We normally implement RAID 10, which we prefer over RAID 6's n plus 2 combinations. We utilize it for data redundancy, even with write intensity on. Regarding the unified storage architecture for NetApp FAS Series, we normally opt for exclusivity unless budget constraints exist. Our IOPS are very high, reaching somewhere about 50k to 150k or 1.150k. The high performance ensures minimal latency. An advantage we've seen with NetApp FAS Series is that snapshots provide very rapid backup and fast recovery. We basically use snapshots for data protection as first-level protection, with deduplication between the two storages serving as second-level protection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

"I like that it's a hybrid entity, as I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options."

"We have just started with HPE StoreEasy but I am looking forward to working with it, as I am satisfied with the technical details and to me, it seems like one of the best solutions available."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"The solution is very good."

"The scalability of HPE StoreEasy is good, with approximately 2,000 users including students, professors, and other departments using it on a daily basis."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"NetApp FAS is highly stable and reliable, especially under a heavy load. That is what I like most about the NetApp."

"The product is flexible."

"We got everything we wanted with all the bells and whistles and all the features and functionalities."

"This solution provides us with easy management and great vendor support."

"The solution is stable."

"Of all storage technologies I work on, it’s the easiest to learn and one of the most powerful."

"It is great to see that NetApp is ahead of the game with regard to support for Virtual Volumes – it is also nice to see that the 8.3 release can be installed on older versions of hardware allowing FAS customers, who purchased their systems a number of years ago, to take advantage of Virtual Volumes."

"The integration with cloud environments has benefited my customers' storage strategy by providing cloud volume ONTAP."

More NetApp FAS Series pros

Cons

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"There is a default Windows installation. Sometimes, when it crashes, the HPE support team asks the customer to reinstall it. That is the only issue customers are facing."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"The adoption of flash by NetApp has also been lagging behind the trendsetters, like TMS, Nimble, and others."

"I think this kind of infrastructure is mostly obsolete. To keep up with developments in this space, you need to move all these features to an All-Flash solution."

"The instructions didn’t provide for re-configurations from scratch and tech support were stuck too."

"I get caught in the upgrade matrix quite a bit, which is an indication that it hasn’t been tested."

"The high cost of the product is an area of concern, so from an improvement perspective, the tool needs to be made cheaper."

"If our customer needs a high-performance storage solution then we don't recommend this product."

"Migration from 7-Mode to Clustered Data ONTAP need improvement. It seems NetApp didn't know how to solve the main problem of migrating data from an old OS (7-Mode ) to Clustered."

"Needs more SAN support."

More NetApp FAS Series cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"The pricing of NetApp FAS Series is not cheap, but in comparison to other vendors, NetApp FAS Series is affordable because they also have deduplication, compression, and inline compression. They focus on storage only, which is really good; it works."

"When we need to implement a less expensive solution we use Huawei. NetApp FAS Series is a little bit expensive compared to the average of the market."

"NetApp FAS Series' pricing is competitive."

"The pricing of NetApp FAS Series is reasonable for its performance."

"The price, compared to competitors, is quite high."

"Low-priced product, but pricing could still be made more attractive."

"The product's pricing is reasonable."

"It’s difficult for us to get money, so make sure you get everything in order, because there’s no going back and saying “oh, I missed this or that”, so make sure you plan well and well in advance."

More NetApp FAS Series pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

See all answers

Which SAN product would you choose: IBM FlashSystem (FS9500) vs PureFlash Array/X NVMe vs PureFlash Array/XL NVMe?

Have you considered a NetApp FAS Storage for your NAS needs? I am sure it fits very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp FAS Series?

I do not handle the pricing part of NetApp FAS Series since it is managed by the sales team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp FAS Series?

There is room for improvement when it comes to response time and first-level support quality. If a new feature needs to be added, it takes some time because it is altogether a new development; othe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 33% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 8% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 8% of the time

FreeNAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 26% of the time

Qumulo vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 5% of the time

HPE MSA vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 4% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 4% of the time

FreeNAS vs NetApp FAS Series

Compared 2% of the time

More NetApp FAS Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

April 2026

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp FAS Series

April 2026

Download NetApp FAS Series product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

No data available

Overview

HPE StoreEasy provides storage and file sharing, offering ease of use, data protection, and scalable performance. It integrates well, is cost-effective, and supports on-premises and cloud storage. However, it needs better feature accessibility and scalability enhancements.

HPE StoreEasy is a versatile NAS storage solution known for its reliable file services and robust data protection features. It is favored for its ease of deployment and hybrid storage capabilities, catering to a range of storage needs from virtualization to backup purposes. The management console enables efficient control, while its integration with virtual machines enhances utility in dynamic IT environments. Despite its strengths, there are areas that require attention, like compatibility with various software and scalability improvements.

What are the core features of HPE StoreEasy?

Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for hassle-free management.
Data Duplication: Efficient data storage and retrieval.
VM Storage: Supports virtual machine data management.
User Quotas: Manages and limits storage per user.
Integration: Seamless connection with existing systems.
Data Protection: Advanced protection against data loss.
Snapshot Scheduling: Regularly captures system states.
Cloud Replication: Syncs data to cloud services.
Hybrid Storage: Combines on-premises and cloud solutions.

What are the benefits and ROI of HPE StoreEasy?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive price per terabyte ratio.
Scalability: Expandable hardware options for growing needs.
Management Efficiency: Centralized control through the console.
Reliability: Consistent performance for critical tasks.

HPE StoreEasy finds applications across different sectors, predominantly in NAS storage and file sharing. It supports logistics by maintaining separate user and server data, assists in virtualization, and solves capacity issues in data centers. Many enterprises use it as a robust alternative when current NAS systems face challenges.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetApp FAS Series offers high availability and seamless protocol integration. Known for its robust features such as data replication and efficient storage architecture, it finds use in challenging enterprise environments and virtualization.

NetApp FAS Series delivers valuable enterprise storage capabilities with an emphasis on unified storage architectures supporting SAN and NAS functionalities. Features like high availability, robust snapshot technology, and seamless protocol integration cater to diverse workloads. Data replication through SnapMirror and reliable performance under heavy loads are appreciated. Deduplication and compression enhance storage efficiency while scalability, resilience, and strong customer support further its appeal. Improvements are desired in flexibility, documentation, speed, and affordability. Additionally, its monitoring capabilities and cloud integration need attention. Organizations employ FAS Series for enterprise storage, SQL Server LUNs, Exchange LUNs, VMware, and corporate file sharing.

What are the most notable features of NetApp FAS Series?

High Availability: Ensures continuous access and reduces downtime.
Snapshot Technology: Offers point-in-time copies for data recovery.
SnapMirror: Provides efficient data replication for disaster recovery.
Storage Efficiency: Deduplication and compression optimize storage use.
Cloud Integration: Enhances flexibility with cloud environments.

What benefits should be examined in reviews?

Scalability: Supports expanding storage needs without performance loss.
Reliability: Maintains robust performance under heavy workloads.
Strong Support: Access to helpful customer service resources.
Cost Efficiency: Consider value in context of feature set and performance.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, NetApp FAS Series is implemented for centralized data management, supporting complex protocols like NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI. This enables efficient handling of virtualization, databases, unified storage tasks, and backup solutions crucial for maintaining unstructured data and redundancy.

NetApp

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

Children's Hospital Central California, Plex Systems, PDF PNI Digital Media, Denver Broncos, PDF KSM Legal, Clayton Companies, Virginia Community College

Buyer's Guide

HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

April 2026

Free Report: HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE StoreEasy vs. NetApp FAS Series report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.