Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers vs Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers comparison

"The most valuable thing about Huawei FusionServer is the fact that it's easy to use."

"It is a stable solution."

"The hardware performance is very valuable."

"The solution is very simple to install."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is the easiest product to set up and maintain."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"It has good integration. You have VMware for connecting many machines, and you can support microservices. You can also easily connect the networks. It is also very easy to use and implement, and it comes with good support."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It is a scalable product."

"In the next release, I'd like to see more features not in the hardware but in the platform where I can manage all the servers and the hardware of the servers."

"I do not have any notes for improvements."

"The RAID Management and the RAID Configuration tools need to be improved."

"It is quite an expensive product. Its price can be improved."

"The performance of the solution could be better."

"Performance and scalability-wise, there are certain areas where the product lacks and needs improvement as it does not provide a lot of fancy features presently."

"Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers could improve the availability of their solution. The supply chain is severely broken, we've had to wait many months for component parts to a system time after time. The availability of discs and raid controllers has been difficult lately."

"HP has a riser inside, but Lenovo does not have a riser. It would be good to have a riser with Lenovo. The GUI of the system is really bad. HP has a very good UI for smart memories and everything inside, but in Lenovo, we have a black-and-white UI. HP right now manufactures a server with scalable SP1 and SP2 on a single machine, which is not the case with Lenovo. They are changing the machine. For SP 1, there is one server, and for SP2, there is another server, which is really bad. In HP, we can use two models of processors in a single case. Lenovo should also be improved to have SP1 and SP2 scalable processors simultaneously on a single machine. They should not release another machine. This issue is also there in H3650 severs. They are all inside, but only V3 CPU or only v4 CPU can work, whereas, in HBG9, we can deploy V3 and V4 simultaneously. Lenovo also needs to advertise more because I can't see advertisements anywhere."

"Throughout the use of the product, special needs will arise which may require a global need."

"It is expensive compared to other vendors."

"The price of Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers is highly competitive. Many customers prefer this solution because of the price. However, the price could be reduced."

"Its pricing is very competitive."

"I don't know the exact amount of money, but when I compared it to Dell or HPE, Lenovo was the best when it comes to price and equipment."

"The price of the solution is very expensive when compared to other solution like HP or Dell."

"Your budget determines the scalability."

"In India, the solution is cheap compared to its competitors."

"Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers can be categorized as a product falling under an affordable price range but more expensive than its competitors."