IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

IBM and Atlassian are both solutions in the Help Desk Software category. IBM is ranked #29, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. IBM holds a 1.2% mindshare in HDS, compared to Atlassian’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Read 9 IBM SmartCloud Control Desk reviews

734 Views
727 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

JIRA Service Management

Read 88 JIRA Service Management reviews

5,671 Views
4,083 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

JIRA Service Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 29, 2025

JIRA Service Management and IBM SmartCloud Control Desk are major competitors in the service management domain. JIRA Service Management reportedly has the advantage, as users appreciate its ease of use and integration capabilities.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers strong customization and integration options, which allow for adaptable workflows and connections with tools like Confluence. Its web-based access broadens global usability. User-friendly interfaces for SLA, ticketing, and dashboards enhance team collaboration. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk centralizes request handling and supports automated workflows, though its design feels more traditional compared to JIRA's modern look.

Room for Improvement: Users advise that JIRA Service Management enhance email integrations and mobile access. The cost of add-ons is a concern, and expanding native capabilities without third-party tools is sought. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk's outdated interface calls for a more modern GUI, and users expect enhanced scalability. Integrating AI and new technologies is a shared improvement area for both solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management excels with flexible deployment options, notably in public cloud environments, and offers generally responsive customer service, though some users note regional support inconsistencies. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is more limited with its on-premises focus and slower customer support, confining its adaptability in cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management is competitively priced, with varied user tiers accommodating different organization sizes, though costs may increase with extra add-ons. Users recognize ROI through boosted efficiency and streamlined communication. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is viewed as costly, tailored more for large enterprises, with ROI mainly validated through expansive deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Ranking in Help Desk Software

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JIRA Service Management

Ranking in Help Desk Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 6.4%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Help Desk Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JIRA Service Management	6.4%
IBM SmartCloud Control Desk	1.2%
Other	92.4%

Help Desk Software

Featured Reviews

Klemen Muhvič

Computer System Engineer at Informatika d.d.

Has centralization and asset management features, and a helpful and knowledgeable technical support team

What needs improvement in IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is its graphical interface because it needs to be more user-friendly. IBM is a big company, but this solution is a little bit outdated. The most common comment I get from customers is that IBM SmartCloud Control Desk looks old and needs a refresh. Its frontend needs a little bit of work. The solution needs to be more modern. In the programming world, you see a lot of new technologies, but this particular solution is still on Java. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk isn't like web-based service request tools, and that's an area for improvement. What I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is a more upscale technology. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk has small issues with document links and attachments, and those could bother you when you're using it for a long time. A more user-friendly GUI is also another improvement I'd like to see in the next version of the solution, plus a better user experience, and it would be great if IBM could resolve the current issues I've noticed in IBM SmartCloud Control Desk.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SLA integrations, reports, and integration with other applications are the most valuable."

"In the early stages of our company, all requests were done in notebooks, and none of it was centrally managed. But now we have a central tool which is an entry point for all requests that come in."

"The brand name is the most valuable aspect of this solution for me. It's IBM. It's a global company that supports this product, it's not something open source or something like that."

"The most valuable are its flexibility and agility. It's quick to change it, to adapt it to your needs. That's the most important for us."

"The solution has been stable."

"The solution is very easy to work with."

"A feature I found most valuable in IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is the service request. Another feature I like most about the solution is IT asset management, which tells you who owns a specific asset in the company and from which date."

"What I like about the Control Desk is that everything is centralized. You have all the requests in one place, you know which ones are for whom and who is working on them."

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk pros

"We have found the issue type feature particularly valuable, as it provides an out-of-the-box solution that aligns with our needs."

"Automation capabilities allow for automatic ticket creation using monitoring tools."

"Jira lets us customize the workflow to meet our requirements. The email and alert features are also handy."

"We have an Agile environment and using Jira makes it easy to adhere to Agile best practices."

"Jira gets the basics right in terms of the product backlog and a scrum board teams can use to manage sprint backlogs."

"The stability of JIRA Service Management is good."

"Service Management is great if you're an Atlassian shop already using JIRA for the development team and you want another tool for help desk ticketing. When it's all under the same umbrella, I can easily take a ticket from the help desk and move it to the development team. You can't beat that integration between two products."

"We get software developed faster."

More JIRA Service Management pros

Cons

"The main issue that we hear from our customers is that the self-service user interface is a little bit old, possibly due to the fact that IBM is such a large enterprise company. People say that they think they're in the year 2004, because you can very clearly see that the technology is lagging behind modern trends."

"Overall the user experience, as opposed to the system and databases, could be improved. It does work as it should and it's good, but they should invest more in the user interfaces to be less data oriented and more appealing for the user."

"Support has been the biggest problem for us. I understand that because we use the product of a global company, some changes are not quick to deploy."

"The solution lacks a graphical user interface."

"What needs improvement in IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is its graphical interface because it needs to be more user-friendly. IBM is a big company, but this solution is a little bit outdated. The most common comment I get from customers is that IBM SmartCloud Control Desk looks old and needs a refresh. Its frontend needs a little bit of work. The solution needs to be more modern. In the programming world, you see a lot of new technologies, but this particular solution is still on Java. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk isn't like web-based service request tools, and that's an area for improvement. What I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is a more upscale technology. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk has small issues with document links and attachments, and those could bother you when you're using it for a long time. A more user-friendly GUI is also another improvement I'd like to see in the next version of the solution, plus a better user experience, and it would be great if IBM could resolve the current issues I've noticed in IBM SmartCloud Control Desk."

"The user interface is not very interesting. If you look at other products like JIRA and ServiceNow, they have made it much easier for the end-users. Maybe not ServiceNow, but JIRA is quite flexible. From a presentation point of view, IBM should make more user-friendly interfaces."

"It could use more facility or flexibility for reporting, and business intelligence in the tool."

"The time calculations can be improved. While working on reports, it was taking the time only in seconds, which was hard for me to work out. While creating some dialogs in the service portal, you have to use certain data types in some fields. It was very tricky to make them work. I was testing a certain type of input, and it didn't work. It didn't show me the domain that the fields have to show. I had to make the change to the database, and only then it worked. It was a tricky thing to make them work with the dialogs. Their technical support can also be improved in terms of response time."

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk cons

"If I need a new feature, JIRA requires me to pay for all users when only specific people use that add-on. I should not have to pay for everyone, so this is an area for improvement."

"We have tried exporting some of the test cases into Jira from Excel. The interface for that isn't very user-friendly."

"From the customer side, it's not friendly used compared to other competitors, like ServiceNow or BMC. It's also not fully ITSM management if you compare it with ServiceNow or BMC. They have a full model of ITSM. In BMC they have TrueSight, they have Discovery, which helps IT to discover IT equipment with a serial number, with the specs, capacity of the server."

"The product does not have the capability to sort queued tickets by product. This would be useful in making workflows more efficient."

"Its UI is a bit overwhelming for new users. That has been the problem with Jira for a long time. If they could put some fields that we could use to simplify the UI, it would be good."

"In general, JIRA has no relation to customers or financials. Therefore, marketplace add-ons are needed to make it work for customer-facing systems."

"Cost has prohibited us from switching entirely to this solution."

"When you raise a ticket with Jira, there's no ability to see your other JIRA tickets."

More JIRA Service Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is paid yearly and is on a per-user basis. You buy the product and pay for its license yearly. IBM is changing the licensing structure, but for now, it's a yearly license. There's no additional cost. It's just the license that you need to pay for to use IBM SmartCloud Control Desk."

"It's basically for a big company because of the costs. A small company can't afford the licensing cost. For medium and large companies, it's the best product. The price of the license is on the higher side compared to others."

"The licensing we have for IBM Control Desk is on a yearly basis. They have a concurrent license and an administrative license. And with these, you get all the products. There aren't any additional fees for extra add-ons or anything like that."

"JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."

"I rate Service Management four out of 10 for affordability. The price could be better, especially for companies using more than one Atlassian product. It's suitable for SMBs that can afford it. I don't think there's another tool that's both better and cheaper. All help desk tools are relatively expensive."

"The price of the solution is becoming expensive and it should be reduced."

"It's not really expensive, especially when you compare to ServiceNow or other solutions, and it's not expensive to maintain."

"Licensing can become quite expensive."

"The license we use is on a yearly basis. As a Solution Partner, we were using the free one and were using the free plugins. We were also giving our own plugins to the Atlassian Solution Partners for free. We don't pay anything to Atlassian."

"But about the plugins, I found one plug-in — its name is Actionable Metric I think — and it is $3000. That is very expensive for users in Iran."

"JIRA Service Management's pricing is pretty decent compared to competitors. I rate the pricing an eight to nine on a scale of one to ten."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?

JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

The price is actually reasonable.

See all answers

Comparisons

SCSM vs IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Compared 21% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Compared 18% of the time

Ameyo Fusion CX vs IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Compared 16% of the time

Zendesk vs IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

Compared 13% of the time

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 15% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 9% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk

January 2026

Download IBM SmartCloud Control Desk product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

January 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Also Known As

SmartCloud Control Desk

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Overview

IBM Control Desk on Cloud offer an access to a user friendly self-service, automated service management, and seamlessly-integrated, best-practice based service desk capabilities. IBM Control Desk provides the IT service management (ITSM) needed to simplify support of users and infrastructure. It also offers a unified IT asset and service management software provides a common control center for managing business processes for both digital and physical assets and enables control, governance and compliance to applications, endpoints and assets to protect critical data and prevent outages. Control Desk is IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL)-compliant, accessible through mobile devices and integrates with social media and development tools.

IBM

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

St Vincent's Health Australia, Kalibrate Pty. Ltd., Cognizant Technology

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Buyer's Guide

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

February 2026

Free Report: IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.