Incredibuild vs Jenkins comparison

IncrediBuild and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. IncrediBuild is ranked #26, while Jenkins is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. IncrediBuild holds a 1.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IncrediBuild users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

Incredibuild

Read 1 Incredibuild review

744 Views
744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

7,083 Views
6,941 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Incredibuild

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Incredibuild and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Incredibuild

Ranking in Build Automation

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Incredibuild is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 9.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jenkins	9.1%
Incredibuild	1.4%
Other	89.5%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Zvika Moskovitz

DevOps Team Leader at Elbit Systems Ltd

Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company

We are using the Incredibuild agent to run multiple processes on all available cores. This is the improvement that we did. Instead of the machine's core doing task after task, it is now running on multiple machines. In my working environment, it is saving time for all our developers in regards to the time consumption of the builds. My team has four people who manage and interact with Incredibuild as a product.

Read full review

Jamshaid I

Principal Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient resource allocation and robust workflow with autoscaling capabilities

In Kubernetes, we use node-based architecture with nodes and pods and follow practices like RBAC and rollback. Multiple pods can run concurrently. We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For each build that runs where I need to generate a code, it takes around half an hour instead of an hour and a half."

"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."

"The most valuable features I have found are it can integrate other services as a plugin."

"Very easy to understand for newcomers."

"Jenkins is a scalable, open-source tool with multiple plugins that is easy to use and set up, and we can integrate it with multiple technologies, whether a .NET application or anything else."

"The most beneficial thing is being able to do everything with just one click, which was not possible previously when any changes needed to be carried out manually."

"Different types of jobs, such as Pipeline, Build, Freestyle, Maven, etc."

"We used it for all continuous integration parts, like automation testing, deployment, etc."

"The performance is fine, and with the huge chunk of connectors that it has, you can literally connect to anything and add anything in the pipeline, with connector parts seamlessly able to integrate into different products and systems."

"It's very useful when you want to automate different processes from beginning to end."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."

"The documentation is not helpful, as it is not user-friendly."

"For this solution to be a 10, it has to be a lot more stable. Maybe the public version of Jenkins is stable, but in our case it's not stable."

"Upgrading and maintaining plugins can be painful, as sometimes upgrading a plugin can break functionality of another plugin that a job is dependent on."

"Performance-wise. This needs to be improved. Not only performance-wise, some functionality or some features can be added to Jenkins."

"Creating a new SonarQube project requires a separate job, and we've encountered some integration issues with Docker and the need for better vulnerability checks."

"They should improve the Version Control tracking system in Jenkins."

"Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests."

"Jenkins is an open-source solution, and people tend to stay on the same version for a long time. When you look for an answer on Google, you often find something that doesn't relate to your implementation. The plugins are both the aspect of Jenkins and also one of the worst because the plugins can have different versions, so it's hard to figure out how to solve the problems."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing and licensing are annoying. Every year, I need to renew. If I miss the deadline date, all my processes will stop working. So, I would prefer that I wouldn't need to renew every year, instead have another solution for it. Or, if we could have an enterprise license agreement with the company, then the development team wouldn't need to spend time renewing licenses."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"Some of the add-ons are too expensive."

"Jenkins is open source."

"It is free."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jenkins?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

TeamCity vs Incredibuild

Compared 25% of the time

EngFlow vs Incredibuild

Compared 22% of the time

Bazel vs Incredibuild

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs Incredibuild

Compared 7% of the time

CircleCI vs Incredibuild

Compared 5% of the time

More Incredibuild Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download Incredibuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

June 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Overview

Incredibuild accelerates development processes by leveraging distributed computing power, enabling faster build times and improved efficiency for complex software projects. It provides a robust platform for developers looking to optimize productivity in demanding environments.

Incredibuild enhances the speed and efficiency of software builds by distributing tasks across a network of machines, effectively minimizing bottlenecks. By harnessing idle processing power, it significantly reduces build times, making it a valuable tool for developers who face stringent deadlines and complex projects. The platform is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing development environments, providing a solution that is easy to implement while delivering powerful performance improvements. Incredibuild's architecture ensures scalability and reliability, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to enhance their build processes.

What are the key features of Incredibuild?

Task Distribution: Leverages a network of computers to distribute workloads efficiently.
Scalability: Easily scales with the growth of development needs.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with existing development tools for smoother operation.
Performance Monitoring: Provides tools to monitor and optimize performance.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Incredibuild?

Reduced Build Times: Accelerates build processes saving time.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure costs by using existing resources.
Increased Productivity: Frees developers from waiting on slow build cycles.

In technology-driven industries like gaming, finance, and automotive, Incredibuild accelerates software build processes, enabling faster innovation and time-to-market. It allows companies to scale development efforts efficiently without a hefty investment in additional hardware, providing a competitive advantage in rapidly evolving markets.

IncrediBuild

Jenkins is an open-source automation server known for its extensive plugin ecosystem and seamless integration with a broad range of tools, enhancing CI/CD processes.

As an automation server, Jenkins streamlines development workflows by managing continuous integration and deployment with powerful pipeline support and distributed build capabilities. Its strong community backbone and ease of use contribute to its ongoing appeal. While highly versatile, Jenkins can encounter scalability and plugin management issues, with areas like cloud integration and security needing attention. It supports automation for build, test, and deployment, ensuring smoother software delivery and infrastructure management across environments.

What are Jenkins's key features?

Extensive Plugin Ecosystem: Allows seamless tool integration.
Open-Source Nature: Backed by a strong community.
CI/CD Optimization: Streamlines development workflows.
Pipeline Support: Facilitates complex scripting.
Distributed Build Management: Efficiently handles multiple environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort.
Scalability: Adapts to growing project needs.
Integration Versatility: Works well with tools like Git.
Community Support: Offers practical solutions and resources.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex automation processes.

Jenkins is implemented in industries focused on continuous software delivery and infrastructure management, including technology firms, finance sectors needing robust deployment pipelines, and enterprise environments requiring complex workflow automation. Companies leverage its automation to enhance productivity and minimize errors in development processes.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Over 2,000 companies worldwide across industries inluding Epic Games, Microsoft, Playstation, Nintendo, Samsung, GM, Intel, CitiGroup, Qualcomm, Boeing, Motorola, Qt, and more accelerate their development and enhance their devs’ productivity with Incredibuild.

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.