JFrog Pipeline vs Jenkins comparison

Jenkins and JFrog are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while JFrog is ranked #22. Jenkins holds a 7.5% mindshare in BA, compared to JFrog’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,005 Views
2,945 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

JFrog Pipeline

Read 1 JFrog Pipeline review

506 Views
496 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

JFrog Pipeline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JFrog Pipeline and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, GitHub and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Pipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 7.5%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Pipeline is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jenkins	7.5%
JFrog Pipeline	2.1%
Other	90.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Jamshaid I

Principal Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient resource allocation and robust workflow with autoscaling capabilities

In Kubernetes, we use node-based architecture with nodes and pods and follow practices like RBAC and rollback. Multiple pods can run concurrently. We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load.

Read full review

Steve Buttler

DevOps Lead at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point

We are using Shippable to automate our CI/CD, so we (and our developers) can focus on our core business. Shippable has tremendously increased our product and features delivery by at least three times. The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration between different tools."

"Having builds and test tasks triggered on commit helps not to break the product."

"GitHub linking is pretty good. We have a deployment application where we can run our tests and add various variables to be passed as assertions to those tests. This is pretty fluid with Jenkins."

"For business needs, Jenkins is the most relevant choice because it can be self-hosted, the price is good, it’s robust, and requires almost no effort for maintenance."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that there are multiple features. We can abstract certain variables and then build our deployment routine while being able to do some abstraction onto the SSH connections."

"Jenkins is a very mature product."

"Also, the ability to customize these plugins is valuable. Its user-friendliness stands out, especially in its user interface which allows easy installation and configuration."

"We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load."

More Jenkins pros

"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."

Cons

"It does not have a very user-friendly interface."

"Centralized user management would be helpful."

"Sometimes you have Jenkins restarting because of OOM errors."

"Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests."

"The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future."

"The support for the latest Java Runtime Environment should be improved."

"Jenkins is an old product, and we encounter performance issues and slow response. Also, some of the plugins are not stable."

"I would like to see even more integrations included in the next release."

More Jenkins cons

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"Jenkins is an open-source tool."

"It is a free product."

"It is an open source."

"Jenkins is open source and free."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"The solution is open source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

GitHub Actions vs JFrog Pipeline

Compared 17% of the time

GitLab vs JFrog Pipeline

Compared 11% of the time

Buildkite vs JFrog Pipeline

Compared 11% of the time

TeamCity vs JFrog Pipeline

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs JFrog Pipeline

Compared 8% of the time

More JFrog Pipeline Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

January 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

January 2026

Download JFrog Pipeline product report

Also Known As

No data available

Shippable

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

SAP, Today Tix, Cisco, Lithium, Pushspring, Packet

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.