Ixia Hawkeye vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,268 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Ixia Hawkeye compete in network monitoring and IT infrastructure management. Ixia Hawkeye appears to have the upper hand in feature richness, offering comprehensive capabilities that justify its price, while users prefer ScienceLogic's pricing and support.

Features: ScienceLogic offers real-time monitoring, automated incident management, robust integrations, and customizable dashboards. Ixia Hawkeye provides detailed traffic insights, advanced analytics, and focuses on network performance and application monitoring. Its in-depth visibility features stand out from ScienceLogic.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its feature set further to match the depth provided by Ixia, enhance in-depth traffic analysis, and widen its application monitoring capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye can work on simplifying its deployment process, adjust its pricing for more budget-conscious organizations, and enhance its user interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a straightforward deployment process emphasizing automation, along with strong support services. Ixia Hawkeye requires a slightly more complex deployment but compensates with reliable customer service and extensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is known for its competitive pricing and swift ROI, making it cost-effective for budget-minded businesses. Ixia Hawkeye, with a higher initial setup cost, delivers substantial value through advanced features, promising a longer-term ROI for those needing in-depth analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Unified Communications Monitoring

4th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Unified Communications Monitoring

1st

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"Power packs."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

The cost is medium. It could be cheaper.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Comparisons

Compared 38% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 33% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 29% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

March 2025

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

EMA

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell