

Stonebranch and JAMS compete in the automation and scheduling software category. Stonebranch generally has the upper hand due to its integration with legacy systems and flexibility, though both tools offer significant advantages in specific areas.
Features: Stonebranch excels in managing complex workflows across diverse platforms, its robust integration with legacy systems like mainframes, and an intuitive web interface. JAMS offers extensive job scheduling options, natural language scheduling, and integration capabilities with various operating systems, focusing on ease of use and flexibility.
Room for Improvement: Stonebranch could benefit from enhanced graphical workflow views, improved icon information, and more robust FTP transfer capabilities. JAMS users often request better search features and more intuitive error handling, noting challenges with task management and execution methods.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Stonebranch and JAMS offer on-premises and cloud deployment options. Stonebranch provides quick setup and seamless integration with existing systems, while JAMS is recognized for its scalability. Both companies receive strong customer service feedback, with Stonebranch users particularly noting quick response times.
Pricing and ROI: Stonebranch is praised for cost-effective pricing, being cheaper than competitors like Automic and Control-M, with minimal additional expenses beyond licensing. JAMS is considered competitively priced, especially with its unlimited licensing model, though there's been a recent price increase. Both solutions have shown positive ROI, with JAMS users experiencing significant cost savings.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
We plan to migrate all the different work scheduling tools to Stonebranch, so I think we will have a single centralized license that will save a lot of cost to the company.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.
We received very good training given by Stonebranch staff, including operator training and administration training.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.
Stonebranch's scalability is very good.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.
We have a huge workload across multiple regions and we are running on the same UAC.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.
Creating a task or job and then creating a schedule with time triggers and other triggers in different objects feels a bit complicated compared to other tools in the market where everything is laid out in a single pane and scheduling is easy.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.
From an organizational cost perspective with Stonebranch, it is a bit cheaper than other tools available in the market.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.
Reporting helps us observe the trend of how much the script has executed in the past and what sort of load is expected in the future based on that analysis.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| Stonebranch | 4.4% |
| Other | 93.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.
Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.
What are the key features of Stonebranch?Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.