Jenkins vs VMware Tanzu Platform comparison

Jenkins and VMware are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while VMware is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. Jenkins holds a 10.5% mindshare in BA, compared to VMware’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

3,625 Views
2,329 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Platform

Read 22 VMware Tanzu Platform reviews

312 Views
219 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

VMware Tanzu Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Jenkins and VMware Tanzu Platform compete in the CI/CD and cloud-native application management category. Jenkins has an advantage due to its extensive open-source community and plugin ecosystem, while VMware Tanzu leads in integration with VMware's own products.

Features: Jenkins is known for its extensive plugin ecosystem, robust community support, and flexibility in integrating with third-party tools. It offers strong support for its CI/CD capabilities. VMware Tanzu Platform excels in integrating with VMware products like vSphere and efficiently managing Kubernetes clusters. Its seamless integration with VMware’s infrastructure stands out.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could improve its plugin stability, user interface, and integration with cloud services. Enhancing plugin documentation and streamlining would be beneficial. VMware Tanzu could improve its integration with non-VMware products, networking controls, and application-level tracing. Pricing is also a concern following VMware's acquisition by Broadcom.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins is easy to deploy on-premises due to its open-source nature, but it lacks official support, relying on community help. VMware Tanzu offers robust hybrid cloud deployments with official support, though this comes at a higher cost. VMware Tanzu users often benefit from the official support, unlike the community-reliant model of Jenkins.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins provides significant ROI as a free, open-source tool, leading to cost savings, relying mainly on self-support and custom solutions. VMware Tanzu, while offering extensive features, involves more expensive subscription costs and generally targets larger enterprises by bundling with other VMware products.

To learn more, read our detailed Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Platform

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (13th), Cloud Management (25th), Development Platforms (3rd), Container Management (3rd), Service Mesh (8th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 10.5%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Platform is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahdi Mallaki

Senior Devops Engineer at Rakuten

Has a community of plugin providers but needs improvement in Kubernetes integration

Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests. In contrast, GitLab offers an integrated Git repository and pipeline runner, streamlining the process. One improvement for Jenkins could be integrating a Git server, simplifying the management of CI/CD pipelines. Currently, with Jenkins, modifying pipeline manifests requires navigating to a separate Git repository. In GitLab, however, manifest changes can be made directly within the repository.

Read full review

DarshanChaudhari

Solutions Architect Hybrid Cloud Practice US/Europe at Tech Mahindra Limited

Empowers seamless connectivity and integration through APIs while offering robust auto-scaling

I am involved in IT services and we provide a solution to customers. We work with VMware, Nutanix, OpenShift, and Microsoft Hyper-V The Tanzu platform is highly available, scalable, and flexible. It offers native services for autoscaling and integrations through APIs, allowing seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are a large number of plugins available for integration with third party systems."

"It is easy to use."

"It's very useful when you want to automate different processes from beginning to end."

"The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs."

"Jenkins is very user-friendly."

"We can schedule anything with Jenkins, which is useful for deployment or anything that requires scheduling. It also has multiple plugins we can use for Maven, JUnit, etc."

"I can install Jenkins for integration from multiple developers and automate application delivery, staging, and production environments."

"The initial setup is pretty simple."

More Jenkins pros

"We never experienced any problems with scalability."

"The most valuable feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is the management functionality of the cluster life cycle. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other vendors, such as Velero for backups and Sonobuoy for compliance. Additionally, it works well in multi-cluster environments."

"The Day 2 operations support is the most vital feature"

"Tanzu Mission Control has quite a set of rich features when compared to OpenShift."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to check the flow of all the different variants within our applications."

"I have multiple Kubernetes environments within my environment. TMC gives me a single pane view, which is good for managing everything."

"VMware Tanzu Mission Control has many valuable features, such as ease of use and customization."

"A feature we find valuable is that other products can also be integrated with Mission Control. This means that we can see the status of specific clusters, as well as view the monitoring application logs all from one point."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pros

Cons

"Performance-wise. This needs to be improved. Not only performance-wise, some functionality or some features can be added to Jenkins."

"Jenkins can improve by continuing to add additional plugins for all the new solutions that are coming out within the cloud sphere."

"We cannot change the ownership of any directory or file or any kind of directory."

"There are some difficulties when we need to execute the DB script."

"It would be better if there were an option to remove its Java dependency. This would make it more compatible with other software, and it could be much better. At present, we have to depend on Java whenever we want to deploy agents."

"The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future."

"Jenkins relies on the old version of interface for configuration management. This needs improvement."

"There is no way for the cloud repositories to trigger Jenkins."

More Jenkins cons

"It is not easy to build a solution with containers. It has a graphical user interface, but you need to have a lot of knowledge of Linux and how to work in the command mode. Its support can also be improved. Currently, its biggest disadvantage is that it is a new product, and the clients prefer to go for a solution that has been in the market for a long time. There are not that many people who know this product."

"Addressing the high upfront costs could improve the product. Implementing a subscription-based model with tiered service options could make it more accessible to a broader range of customers."

"Customers have noticed a considerable price increase after VMware's acquisition by Broadcom."

"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The solution could benefit from improved customization and visibility for its users."

"Tanzu provides better manageability as compared to OCP, but when it comes to tagging it with other products, it's a bit rigid. If I have to bring in any new product or something out of the box from a different vendor, working with Tanzu becomes a little difficult. For example, if I want to use the F5 services, I have to add one more layer of Avi, but I don't want to do that. If I have a list of the products that I want to use, such as for firewall services, with Tanzu, I will have to go through another layer, which creates complexity."

"LYNX is a managed cluster solution that takes care of specific details within a cluster, such as sequences or services. I haven't seen this feature in Tanzu Mission Control."

"The disaster recovery feature could be improved to provide better tracking of issues. I would also like to see the introduction of a dashboard view, for even further integration of all the areas that Mission Control looks at."

"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."

More VMware Tanzu Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"The pricing for Jenkins is free."

"Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

"There are different licenses available. You have to upgrade your license if you want to scale the solution more."

"Its pricing is very competitive. We get around 70% or 75%, sometimes even 80%, discount on the product. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent."

"The licensing cost is expensive."

"One of our Spanish customers told us that VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is a very expensive product for their data center."

"The solution is only for large or medium size enterprises because it is expensive."

"I would recommend that businesses look into the full price for their requirements. The price is high, but there are some open-source add-ons that can be used for customization while keeping costs down, although these might not be suitable for everyone."

"The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution"

More VMware Tanzu Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native ap...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution. I would rate the pricing of VMware Tanzu Mission Control as four out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 17% of the time

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins

Compared 2% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Rancher Labs vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Kubernetes vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

June 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Platform

June 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tanzu Application Catalog, Application Platform, Application Service, Hub, Mission Control, Service Mesh, Build Service, Concourse for VMware Tanzu

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

VMware Tanzu Platform is designed for cloud-native development and management of Kubernetes, CI/CD processes, microservices, and containerized workloads. It supports deployments both on cloud and on-premises, providing centralized management via Mission Control.

VMware Tanzu Platform offers seamless integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN, supporting centralized cluster management and lifecycle management. The platform provides a GUI for monitoring CI/CD pipelines and network policies, enhancing multi-tenancy and Day 2 operations. Users can easily manage Kubernetes clusters, monitor applications, and integrate with tools such as GitHub, GitLab, Cloud Foundry, and Azure. It ensures compliance and security for service providers, financial institutions, and businesses.

What are the key features of VMware Tanzu Platform?

Integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN: Enhances compatibility and flexibility.
Seamless Cluster Management: Centralized control over Kubernetes clusters.
CI/CD Pipelines and Network Policies: Simplifies monitoring and management.
Multi-tenancy Support: Facilitates resource sharing among multiple users.
Comprehensive Lifecycle Management: Streamlines deployment and scalability.
Observability Platform: Provides enhanced visibility and control.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in VMware Tanzu Platform reviews?

Centralized Management: Simplifies operations and reduces manual effort.
Enhanced Compliance and Security: Meets regulatory requirements.
Flexibility in Deployment: Supports both cloud and on-premises options.
Seamless Integration: Works with multiple vendors and tools.
Developer-Friendly Environment: Improves productivity and innovation.

Industries such as financial institutions, service providers, and businesses requiring rigorous compliance and security deploy VMware Tanzu Platform. These entities benefit from centralized management, streamlined DevOps processes, and integrated tools, enhancing their capabilities in cloud-native developments and containerized workloads.

VMware

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jenkins vs. VMware Tanzu Platform report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.