CloudBees vs Jenkins comparison

CloudBees and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jenkins is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. CloudBees holds a 2.2% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,769 Views
796 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,209 Views
3,113 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CloudBees

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Jenkins and CloudBees compete in the continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) category. While Jenkins offers notable flexibility and community support, CloudBees provides enterprise-level security and scalability, making it advantageous for larger teams and more complex pipelines.

Features: Jenkins offers extensive flexibility with its open-source plugin ecosystem, allowing for seamless integration with various development and testing tools, which supports pipeline customization and automation. CloudBees expands on Jenkins's foundation by offering advanced security features, greater scalability, and dedicated enterprise support, which are essential for handling larger teams and complex pipelines effectively.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins users frequently highlight the need for a more stable interface and enhanced handling of plugin dependencies. Improved installation processes and comprehensive documentation, especially for plugin development, are areas of concern. CloudBees could benefit from faster performance and plugin updates, as it sometimes relies on vendor management for these tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins is highly adaptable, supporting deployment across on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments. Community support is vast but lacks official technical support. In contrast, CloudBees provides enterprise support, though users have noted slower response times, especially in large-scale implementations that use proprietary tools.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is primarily open-source and free, which offers high cost-efficiency for businesses looking for effective CI tools without licensing fees. Its open nature promotes widespread adoption and cost savings. CloudBees, though more expensive, justifies its cost through additional enterprise features and support, which are valuable for organizations requiring advanced security, compliance, and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. Jenkins

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (2nd), AI Software Development (8th)

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 2.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 7.2%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jenkins	7.2%
CloudBees	2.2%
Other	90.6%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Jamshaid I

Principal Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient resource allocation and robust workflow with autoscaling capabilities

In Kubernetes, we use node-based architecture with nodes and pods and follow practices like RBAC and rollback. Multiple pods can run concurrently. We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudBees is a user-friendly tool."

"It can manage multiple Jenkins instances."

"Scalability largely depends on how the tool is set up within your infrastructure"

"CloudBees operates seamlessly. Deploying to a cluster is straightforward—just one click, and the job is done."

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

More CloudBees pros

"We have started to integrate Pipelines as a part of a build, and built a library of common functions. It simplified and made our build scripts more readable."

"I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company."

"The initial setup is simple."

"Jenkins is stable, user-friendly, and helps with continuous integration. As of today, I can't see any tool that's better than Jenkins."

"We are using the open-source version and there is a lot of plugins and features that are available and it works on agents for free. In other solutions, it will cost extra to use them with the agent."

"Jenkins's open-based framework is very valuable."

"The initial setup is pretty simple."

"The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. W"

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"We did face some challenges, particularly with the infrastructure."

"There could be improvements in the ease of use."

"If you're logged in and working for about thirty minutes and then go idle for five to ten minutes, Jenkins will prompt you to re-authenticate."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

"It could improve the document upload process."

More CloudBees cons

"I sometimes face a bottleneck when installing the plugins on an offline machine. Mapping the dependencies and then installing the correct sequence of dependencies is a nightmare, and it took me two days to do it."

"This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful."

"Support should be provided at no cost, as there is no free support available for any of the free versions."

"Jenkins could improve in areas related to Kubernetes and Docker container integration, like machine allocation of nodes and Marshaling integration improvements."

"It could be cheaper."

"Jenkins is an old product, and we encounter performance issues and slow response. Also, some of the plugins are not stable."

"Developer documentation for plugins, plugin development, integrations: Sometimes it’s tricky to do pretty obvious things."

"I would like to see even more integrations included in the next release."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing for Jenkins is free."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"It is free."

"Some of the add-ons are too expensive."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"It is an open source."

"There is no cost. It is open source."

"Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 8% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 8% of the time

CircleCI vs CloudBees

Compared 7% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs CloudBees

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

JFrog Pipeline vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

January 2026

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

January 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. Jenkins

February 2026

Free Report: CloudBees vs. Jenkins

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. Jenkins report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.