Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBees vs Jenkins comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees enhances DevOps processes with significant ROI through automation, support, and reduced manual efforts, outweighing its costs.
Sentiment score
8.5
Jenkins provides excellent ROI by being free, enhancing satisfaction, streamlining deployment, reducing errors, and lowering costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support is responsive and efficient, though some encounter plugin issues and delays; CloudBees University aids with technical help.
Sentiment score
6.5
Jenkins relies on robust community support for answers, while CloudBees offers varying response times for additional assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees is praised for its scalability, flexibility, and efficient scaling across diverse infrastructures, despite some concerns about resource consumption.
Sentiment score
7.2
Jenkins is scalable and adaptable, effectively managing many jobs, with enhanced capabilities via Kubernetes and Docker integration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is stable overall but has upgrade and performance challenges, needing careful configuration and technical support.
Sentiment score
7.1
Jenkins is generally stable with occasional issues, but performance improves significantly with better hardware and recent updates.
 

Room For Improvement

CloudBees faces challenges with user interface, performance, and compatibility, needing improvements in GUI, AI integration, and pipeline management.
Jenkins requires UI/UX enhancements, plugin stability, better integration, improved documentation, and more effective troubleshooting for user satisfaction.
 

Setup Cost

CloudBees is seen as expensive but offers value through extensive features, with costs often handled by dedicated teams.
Jenkins is cost-effective and open-source, with additional costs for infrastructure and an enterprise edition offering extra features.
 

Valuable Features

CloudBees provides scalable, secure CI/CD processes with seamless integrations and automation, favored for its flexibility and extensive support.
Jenkins excels in automation, integration, and scalability with its robust ecosystem, enhancing collaboration, efficiency, and reliability.
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (8th)
Jenkins
Ranking in Build Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 2.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 7.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Jenkins7.3%
CloudBees2.4%
Other90.3%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
Mahdi Mallaki - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has a community of plugin providers but needs improvement in Kubernetes integration
Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests. In contrast, GitLab offers an integrated Git repository and pipeline runner, streamlining the process. One improvement for Jenkins could be integrating a Git server, simplifying the management of CI/CD pipelines. Currently, with Jenkins, modifying pipeline manifests requires navigating to a separate Git repository. In GitLab, however, manifest changes can be made directly within the repository.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Administrator at Facebook
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Legal Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise57
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?
Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.
What needs improvement with Jenkins?
I do not have any notes for improvement.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.