Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CloudBees Logo

Top 10 CloudBees Alternatives

Vendor: CloudBees
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top CloudBees Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CloudBees based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Snyk, GitLab, and Tekton. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

CloudBees surpasses its competitors by offering seamless CI/CD integration, enterprise-grade security features, and robust scalability options, empowering organizations to accelerate software delivery while enhancing reliability and efficiency.

CloudBees Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CloudBees, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CloudBees Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Snyk appeals with its simplicity and robust Slack integrations, ideal for developers needing efficient support. In comparison, CloudBees focuses on scalability, offering extensive release automation for enterprise CI/CD. Snyk's quick deployment contrasts with CloudBees' comprehensive tool integrations for complex needs.
Download CloudBees vs. Snyk Report
Snyk offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while CloudBees involves a more complex setup process, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Snyk offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while CloudBees involves a more complex setup process, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
CloudBees Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GitLab stands out for its user-friendly design and extensive feature set, enhancing team collaboration and rapid deployments. In comparison, CloudBees excels in scalability and security for complex pipeline management, making it ideal for larger enterprises needing advanced CI/CD operations.
Download CloudBees vs. GitLab Report
GitLab offers straightforward and affordable initial setup costs, while CloudBees presents a higher investment with more complexity in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
GitLab offers straightforward and affordable initial setup costs, while CloudBees presents a higher investment with more complexity in initial implementation.
CloudBees Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
Tekton offers scalability and customization for Kubernetes environments, ideal for OpenShift-focused deployments. In comparison, CloudBees provides strong security and integration for enterprise needs, offering advanced monitoring. Tekton's open-source model contrasts with CloudBees' pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Download CloudBees vs. Tekton Report
Tekton's setup cost is competitive, offering a cost-effective open-source solution, while CloudBees provides a robust enterprise package with a higher initial investment. These distinct pricing models cater to different organizational needs and budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Tekton's setup cost is competitive, offering a cost-effective open-source solution, while CloudBees provides a robust enterprise package with a higher initial investment. These distinct pricing models cater to different organizational needs and budget considerations.
CloudBees Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
GitHub Actions
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees offers scalability and tool integration for complex pipelines, ideal for large teams. In comparison, GitHub Actions, integrated into GitHub, is noted for ease of use. CloudBees supports varied deployments, while GitHub Actions appeals with cost-effective and flexible pricing.
Download CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions Report
CloudBees has a higher setup cost compared to GitHub Actions, which offers more affordable initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
CloudBees has a higher setup cost compared to GitHub Actions, which offers more affordable initial pricing.
CloudBees Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins offers flexibility and extensive plugins for automation across environments. In comparison, CloudBees provides enterprise features like pipeline orchestration and security, appealing to organizations needing compliance and integration capabilities, justifying its higher cost with enhanced functionality.
Download CloudBees vs. Jenkins Report
Jenkins offers a cost-effective setup, whereas CloudBees requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront costs for users comparing these DevOps solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Jenkins offers a cost-effective setup, whereas CloudBees requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront costs for users comparing these DevOps solutions.
CloudBees Logo
CloudBees Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.1 out of 5
AWS Systems Manager excels in AWS integration for resource management and automation. In comparison, CloudBees focuses on CI/CD with robust Jenkins integration. AWS suits AWS-driven environments, while CloudBees appeals to developers seeking efficient software delivery through strong pipeline automation.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. CloudBees Report
AWS Systems Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to CloudBees, which is relatively higher.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Systems Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to CloudBees, which is relatively higher.
CloudBees Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
Harness offers cost-effective pricing and strong support, focusing on automation with features like auto-deployment. In comparison, CloudBees delivers extensive integration options and rich enterprise CI features, appealing to organizations requiring robust integration and customization but willing to invest more.
Download CloudBees vs. Harness Report
Harness has streamlined setup costs, providing a straightforward entry point, whereas CloudBees involves a more complex setup with varied expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Harness has streamlined setup costs, providing a straightforward entry point, whereas CloudBees involves a more complex setup with varied expenses.
CloudBees Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
TeamCity
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity offers intuitive CI features and cross-platform support, making it suitable for build automation. In comparison, CloudBees provides robust scalability and integration capabilities, ideal for managing complex architectures and enterprise deployments. TeamCity is easier to configure, while CloudBees targets extensive enterprise needs.
Download CloudBees vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a competitive setup cost with a straightforward pricing model, while CloudBees requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a competitive setup cost with a straightforward pricing model, while CloudBees requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
CloudBees Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
Bamboo integrates seamlessly within Atlassian products, excelling in build automation and ease of use. In comparison, CloudBees is suited for large teams needing extensive pipeline management and diverse integrations, offering robust security and scalability for complex DevOps needs. Pricing varies based on scalability demands.
Download Bamboo vs. CloudBees Report
Bamboo's setup cost is generally lower than CloudBees, which typically incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Bamboo's setup cost is generally lower than CloudBees, which typically incurs higher initial expenses.
CloudBees Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
AWS CodePipeline is preferred for its competitive pricing and integration within AWS services. In comparison, CloudBees provides advanced security and flexibility, favoring large enterprises needing extensive integrations. Buyers might choose AWS for affordability and simplicity, or CloudBees for scalability and robust feature sets.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. CloudBees Report
AWS CodePipeline offers minimal setup costs, effectively lowering initial expenses, while CloudBees incurs a higher setup cost, impacting upfront budget allocation more significantly.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS CodePipeline offers minimal setup costs, effectively lowering initial expenses, while CloudBees incurs a higher setup cost, impacting upfront budget allocation more significantly.
CloudBees Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
GoCD
3.8 out of 5
GoCD appeals to organizations needing cost-effective, open-source pipeline management. In comparison, CloudBees enhances Jenkins for large enterprises, offering advanced features like Kubernetes support and compliance integrations, making it ideal for businesses seeking scalability and enterprise-level capabilities.
Download CloudBees vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while CloudBees presents a more complex configuration process, potentially leading to higher expenses. This cost variation may influence budget-focused users when selecting their preferred solution.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while CloudBees presents a more complex configuration process, potentially leading to higher expenses. This cost variation may influence budget-focused users when selecting their preferred solution.
CloudBees Logo
CircleCI
3.4 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
CircleCI
3.4 out of 5
CircleCI attracts budget-conscious teams with its affordability and responsive support. In comparison, CloudBees, with its extensive enterprise features, is suitable for large organizations seeking scalability. CircleCI offers simplicity, while CloudBees provides a comprehensive feature set for those willing to invest for long-term value.
Download CircleCI vs. CloudBees Report
CircleCI offers a cost-effective setup, while CloudBees incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CircleCI offers a cost-effective setup, while CloudBees incurs higher initial expenses.
CloudBees Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
AWS CloudFormation
4.2 out of 5
AWS CloudFormation focuses on quick deployment with infrastructure as code and integration, appealing to tech buyers who prioritize automation. In comparison, CloudBees emphasizes CI/CD with strong third-party integrations, attracting those seeking scalability and advanced security in complex environments.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. CloudBees Report
AWS CloudFormation offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while CloudBees requires a more involved initial investment with potentially higher setup expenses. This contrast highlights the differing economic approach each service takes in catering to their users.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS CloudFormation offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while CloudBees requires a more involved initial investment with potentially higher setup expenses. This contrast highlights the differing economic approach each service takes in catering to their users.
CloudBees Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
Digital.ai Release
4.2 out of 5
Digital.ai Release excels in automation for complex pipelines, appealing to organizations seeking streamlined processes. In comparison, CloudBees offers superior integration and customization options, attracting those who prioritize extensibility and flexible deployment.
Download CloudBees vs. Digital.ai Release Report
Digital.ai Release offers competitive setup costs that may fit larger budgets, while CloudBees presents a more affordable alternative attractive to smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital.ai Release offers competitive setup costs that may fit larger budgets, while CloudBees presents a more affordable alternative attractive to smaller enterprises.
CloudBees Logo
CloudBees Logo
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks
3.8 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks excels in network automation with comprehensive visibility and robust management, appealing to buyers focused on diverse network device management. In comparison, CloudBees enhances CI/CD processes and developer productivity, ideal for organizations prioritizing software development and efficiency despite higher initial costs.
Download BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks vs. CloudBees Report
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks has a setup cost advantage, while CloudBees often incurs higher initial setup expenses. This key difference may be a deciding factor for organizations prioritizing upfront budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks has a setup cost advantage, while CloudBees often incurs higher initial setup expenses. This key difference may be a deciding factor for organizations prioritizing upfront budget considerations.
CloudBees Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
AWS CodeBuild excels in AWS ecosystem integration, automatic scaling, and pay-per-use model suitable for AWS-centric projects. In comparison, CloudBees appeals with advanced CI/CD tools and enterprise-grade features, offering a tailored solution for businesses requiring flexibility and security in complex projects.
Download AWS CodeBuild vs. CloudBees Report
AWS CodeBuild offers a straightforward setup process with minimal cost compared to CloudBees, which may involve more complex and expensive initial implementation. These differences highlight the varying approaches taken by each service in terms of initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS CodeBuild offers a straightforward setup process with minimal cost compared to CloudBees, which may involve more complex and expensive initial implementation. These differences highlight the varying approaches taken by each service in terms of initial setup cost.
CloudBees Logo
LaunchDarkly
4.0 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
LaunchDarkly
4.0 out of 5
CloudBees excels with its seamless CI/CD integration and extensive pipeline automation for comprehensive development solutions. In comparison, LaunchDarkly offers advanced feature management tools, providing real-time control and efficient deployment for agile environments, making it ideal for teams prioritizing sophisticated feature delivery strategies.
Download CloudBees vs. LaunchDarkly Report
CloudBees has higher setup costs, while LaunchDarkly offers a more affordable initial pricing model, highlighting a significant difference in their entry-level investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
CloudBees has higher setup costs, while LaunchDarkly offers a more affordable initial pricing model, highlighting a significant difference in their entry-level investment requirements.
CloudBees Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
AWS Config
4.3 out of 5
AWS Config highlights compliance auditing and integration within AWS, appealing to cost-effective Amazon-centric infrastructures. In comparison, CloudBees enhances CI/CD processes in diverse environments, attracting businesses seeking long-term ROI through agile development and rich feature sets tailored for software delivery automation.
Download AWS Config vs. CloudBees Report
AWS Config has lower setup costs compared to CloudBees, which offers extensive customization that may result in higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Config has lower setup costs compared to CloudBees, which offers extensive customization that may result in higher initial expenses.
CloudBees Logo
GNU Make
4.2 out of 5
CloudBees Logo
GNU Make
4.2 out of 5
GNU Make offers cost-effective build automation favored for small projects. In comparison, CloudBees excels with advanced deployment pipelines and integration for complex, enterprise environments. GNU Make's simplicity contrasts with CloudBees's higher investment justified by its scalability and comprehensive customer support.
Download CloudBees vs. GNU Make Report
GNU Make offers no setup costs making it an attractive option for cost-conscious users, while CloudBees incurs higher setup expenses for more extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
GNU Make offers no setup costs making it an attractive option for cost-conscious users, while CloudBees incurs higher setup expenses for more extensive features.

Related categories

DevSecOps
Build Automation
Configuration Management