Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBees vs TeamCity comparison

CloudBees and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while JetBrains is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.8. CloudBees holds a 2.4% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.
CloudBees
Read 20 CloudBees reviews
  • 2,032 Views
  • 894 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TeamCity
Read 28 TeamCity reviews
  • 2,314 Views
  • 2,291 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

TeamCity and CloudBees are strong contenders in the CI/CD tools category, each offering unique advantages. Based on the data, CloudBees takes the lead, primarily due to its enterprise-level features, scalability, and advanced security capabilities.

Features: TeamCity offers flexibility in build pipelines, template use, and a robust plug-in system. It is user-friendly, even for non-technical users, with support for multiple scripts and integration with GitHub. CloudBees shines with its pipeline release orchestration, compliance and audit features, and intensive integration within Jenkins and other tools. Its scalability for handling complex pipelines is notable, along with excellent application delivery automation and advanced security features.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could improve .NET deployment solutions, build out-of-the-box offerings, and provide a smoother upgrade experience. It also needs more intuitive configuration options and better integration with various version control systems. CloudBees requires better management of older plugins and improved infrastructure stability. Ease of setup could be enhanced to streamline the initial process, especially for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity supports private cloud, public cloud, and on-premises deployment, offering a strong community and generally robust tech support despite timezone challenges. CloudBees provides excellent customer service and is lauded for prompt vendor support. It supports multiple deployment options and highlights vendor support as a key advantage.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity works on a freemium model, offering free licenses for exploration but is considered more costly than newer tools. Nevertheless, CloudBees justifies its higher pricing with its rich enterprise-level features, excellent delivery benefits, and overall value for large-scale deployments, despite lacking exact pricing information.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. TeamCity
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees enhances DevOps processes with significant ROI through automation, support, and reduced manual efforts, outweighing its costs.
Sentiment score
8.0
TeamCity enhances build efficiency and deployment across time zones, supporting automation for optimized resource allocation and ROI evaluation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support is responsive and efficient, though some encounter plugin issues and delays; CloudBees University aids with technical help.
Sentiment score
7.6
TeamCity's customer service is praised for professionalism, responsive support, comprehensive documentation, and effective community resources despite time zone challenges.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees is praised for its scalability, flexibility, and efficient scaling across diverse infrastructures, despite some concerns about resource consumption.
Sentiment score
7.3
TeamCity enables scalable deployments with multiple agents, requiring regular maintenance, effectively supporting large-scale projects and numerous users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is stable overall but has upgrade and performance challenges, needing careful configuration and technical support.
Sentiment score
7.7
TeamCity offers high reliability and stability, with minimal disruptions and effective resource management, despite occasional minor lags.
 

Room For Improvement

CloudBees faces challenges with user interface, performance, and compatibility, needing improvements in GUI, AI integration, and pipeline management.
TeamCity's complex setup, poor UI navigation, and integration issues hinder efficiency, with needs for API, reporting, and alert improvements.
 

Setup Cost

CloudBees is seen as expensive but offers value through extensive features, with costs often handled by dedicated teams.
TeamCity offers a developer-focused solution with scalable costs but requires an initial server setup expense despite a free version.
 

Valuable Features

CloudBees provides scalable, secure CI/CD processes with seamless integrations and automation, favored for its flexibility and extensive support.
TeamCity excels in build step flexibility, plugin support, cross-platform capabilities, Git integration, and intuitive usability for efficient pipeline management.
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (8th)
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 2.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 5.8%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudBees2.4%
TeamCity5.8%
Other91.8%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
YashBrahmani
Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
Read full review
RG
RubyGarg
IT Professional at NatWest Group
Versatile agent support boosts builds but UI and setup costs need refinement
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related to the version we were using. For instance, there were issues with agent specifications for particular build jobs and a timeout issue where jobs running longer than three hours would fail automatically.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user184734
Systems Administrator at Facebook
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Legal Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
See all answers
What do you like most about TeamCity?
One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?
Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TeamCity?
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees Logo
Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees
Compared 6% of the time
GitLab vs CloudBees Logo
GitLab vs CloudBees
Compared 5% of the time
Harness vs CloudBees Logo
Harness vs CloudBees
Compared 5% of the time
CircleCI vs CloudBees Logo
CircleCI vs CloudBees
Compared 5% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs CloudBees Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs CloudBees
Compared 4% of the time
More CloudBees Competitors
GitLab vs TeamCity Logo
GitLab vs TeamCity
Compared 23% of the time
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity
Compared 10% of the time
Jenkins vs TeamCity Logo
Jenkins vs TeamCity
Compared 9% of the time
Harness vs TeamCity Logo
Harness vs TeamCity
Compared 6% of the time
GNU Make vs TeamCity Logo
GNU Make vs TeamCity
Compared 3% of the time
More TeamCity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CloudBees
March 2026
CloudBees reportDownload CloudBees product report
Buyer's Guide
TeamCity
February 2026
TeamCity reportDownload TeamCity product report
 

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

  • User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
  • Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
  • Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
  • Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
  • Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

  • Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
  • Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
  • Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
  • Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains
 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. TeamCity
March 2026
Free Report: CloudBees vs. TeamCity
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CloudBees vs. TeamCity report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.