Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
TeamCity Logo

Top 10 TeamCity Alternatives

Vendor: JetBrains
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top TeamCity Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to TeamCity based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, VMware Tanzu Platform, and Tekton. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

JetBrains Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with JetBrains, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
TeamCity Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GitLab is popular for source code management, CI/CD pipelines, and team collaboration. Companies utilize it for repository management, automated deployment, and code integration. It integrates with tools like SonarQube, enhancing code analysis with cloud compatibility. Users appreciate branch management, automation, excellent user experience, and seek better integrations and improved documentation for enhanced productivity.
Download GitLab vs. TeamCity Report
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
View comparison
Pricing
I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.
The price is okay.
TeamCity Logo
TeamCity Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity excels in continuous integration and deployment with flexible features and developer-friendly pricing, appealing to those seeking easy configuration. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Platform specializes in comprehensive cloud-native management, ideal for enterprises needing strong infrastructure integration and extensive monitoring capabilities.
Download TeamCity vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
TeamCity offers a more cost-effective setup, while VMware Tanzu Platform requires a higher initial investment. These differences may significantly impact budgeting considerations when comparing these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a more cost-effective setup, while VMware Tanzu Platform requires a higher initial investment. These differences may significantly impact budgeting considerations when comparing these solutions.
TeamCity Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity offers flexible CI capabilities with cross-platform builds and an extensive plugin ecosystem, including Octopus Deploy. In comparison, Tekton excels with Kubernetes-native features for efficient cloud scaling and a serverless architecture, providing advanced customization options within Kubernetes environments.
Download TeamCity vs. Tekton Report
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a moderate setup cost, while Tekton offers a more affordable option, highlighting a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
TeamCity Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins offers a highly customizable platform with extensive plugin options and strong community support, ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, TeamCity provides robust built-in features and dedicated support, appealing to larger organizations seeking seamless integration and comprehensive service packages.
Download Jenkins vs. TeamCity Report
Jenkins requires no initial setup cost, offering flexibility for open-source projects, while TeamCity involves setup expenses, providing comprehensive features for enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Jenkins requires no initial setup cost, offering flexibility for open-source projects, while TeamCity involves setup expenses, providing comprehensive features for enterprise environments.
TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
TeamCity offers robust CI/CD capabilities with flexible configurations and advanced build tools. In comparison, GitHub Actions provides seamless GitHub integration with extensive Marketplace Actions. TeamCity is ideal for intensive use, while GitHub Actions attracts small to medium teams with its cost-effectiveness.
Download GitHub Actions vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup, whereas GitHub Actions provides a more integrated experience within the GitHub ecosystem, highlighting the distinct setup approaches between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup, whereas GitHub Actions provides a more integrated experience within the GitHub ecosystem, highlighting the distinct setup approaches between the two platforms.
TeamCity Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
TeamCity excels in integration capabilities appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Harness offers advanced deployment automation, ideal for complex processes. TeamCity supports flexibility, while Harness provides AI-driven automation for streamlined workflows, enhancing ease of use for intricate deployment tasks.
Download Harness vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Harness presents a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup cost, while Harness presents a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
TeamCity Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
TeamCity offers extensive plugin support and flexibility, catering to diverse technologies and infrastructures. In comparison, Bamboo integrates seamlessly with the Atlassian suite, benefiting those utilizing Jira and Bitbucket. Tech buyers might prefer TeamCity for customization, while Bamboo suits Atlassian-centric environments.
Download Bamboo vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has lower setup costs compared to Bamboo, which involves higher initial investment. Bamboo offers more out-of-the-box integrations, while TeamCity provides greater flexibility in customization and automation.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has lower setup costs compared to Bamboo, which involves higher initial investment. Bamboo offers more out-of-the-box integrations, while TeamCity provides greater flexibility in customization and automation.
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
TeamCity offers extensive plugin support and flexibility, making it suitable for complex CI/CD pipelines with multiple integrations. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly within AWS services, enhancing deployment with centralized management, appealing to users operating predominantly within the AWS ecosystem.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.
TeamCity Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
TeamCity attracts buyers with robust feature sets and enterprise suitability, making it ideal for complex workflows. In comparison, CircleCI appeals to those seeking ease of use and rapid deployment, ideal for startups prioritizing speed and straightforward configuration without extensive infrastructure demands.
Download CircleCI vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup with no upfront costs, while CircleCI provides a budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity offers a straightforward setup with no upfront costs, while CircleCI provides a budget-friendly setup option.
TeamCity Logo
Nx
3.5 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Nx
3.5 out of 5
Nx is ideal for managing complex projects with microservices architecture due to its robust modular structure and extensible workspace. It offers powerful code generation and intelligent caching features. Some users suggest enhancements in documentation and reducing the initial learning curve for beginners.
View comparison
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
AWS CodeBuild
4.1 out of 5
TeamCity offers customizable build templates and cross-platform support, ideal for complex projects. In comparison, AWS CodeBuild provides elasticity and a serverless nature, beneficial for scaling projects within the AWS ecosystem. Both address unique needs in the CI/CD landscape.
Download AWS CodeBuild vs. TeamCity Report
TeamCity has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CodeBuild, which offers lower entry expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CodeBuild, which offers lower entry expenses.
TeamCity Logo
JFrog Pipeline
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
JFrog Pipeline
4.0 out of 5
JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.
The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there.
View comparison
Pricing
The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there.
TeamCity Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Travis CI
3.0 out of 5
TeamCity excels in customization and deployment flexibility, appealing to enterprises needing control and scalability. In comparison, Travis CI, known for ease of use and efficient setup, attracts startups and smaller teams prioritizing speed and simplicity with strong GitHub integration.
TeamCity requires a significant initial investment for setup, contrasting with Travis CI's minimal setup costs, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamCity requires a significant initial investment for setup, contrasting with Travis CI's minimal setup costs, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
TeamCity Logo
Incredibuild
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Incredibuild
4.0 out of 5

Incredibuild, the world’s leading platform for development acceleration, lets you deliver faster developer cycles and shorten your time-top market with more compute power and lower costs on prem and the cloud.

View comparison
TeamCity Logo
Codefresh
1 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
Codefresh
1 out of 5

Codefresh is a next-generation enterprise software delivery platform for cloud-native applications. We help you automate your GitOps workflows and advanced deployments such as Canary and Blue/Green and are the premium Argo enterprise solution. DevOps teams from GoodRx, Monday.com, Deloitte, and more depend on Codefresh to deploy their software in a safe and scalable manner. Codefresh can support any pipeline end-to-end.

View comparison
TeamCity Logo
JRebel
4.0 out of 5
TeamCity Logo
JRebel
4.0 out of 5
JRebel is a JVM Java Agent that integrates with application servers, making classes reloadable with existing class loaders. Only changed classes are recompiled and instantly reloaded in the running application. JRebel plugs into IDEs and build systems. Classes and static resources are loaded straight from the workspace.
View comparison

Related categories

Build Automation
Application Security Tools
Release Automation