Buildkite vs TeamCity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Buildkite and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Buildkite is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while JetBrains is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. Buildkite holds a 3.3% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Buildkite users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Buildkite

Read 14 Buildkite reviews

2,304 Views
2,281 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

4,211 Views
4,169 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Buildkite

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

TeamCity and Buildkite are leading tools in the CI/CD industry, each catering to different user preferences. Buildkite stands out for its simplicity and cloud-native capabilities, making it preferable for users seeking ease of setup and manageability, especially in cloud environments.

Features: TeamCity supports comprehensive configurations with features like build chains, cross-platform support, and an extensive plugin ecosystem, making it ideal for complex dependencies. It integrates seamlessly with various technologies. Buildkite is distinguished by its cloud-native operations, smooth functionality with AWS and Google Cloud, and the ability to manage builds using YAML files, offering efficient caching mechanisms for optimizing the build process.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could enhance its user experience by simplifying its setup process, as users find its configuration complex and challenging. Improved out-of-box solutions and better integration support are desired. Buildkite needs to address issues with scalability and user interface by improving logging, error identification, and expanding third-party documentation and plugin support. Enhanced auto-scaling and easier external service integration would also improve its flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers diverse deployment options, including private cloud and on-premises setups that cater to enterprise needs. In contrast, Buildkite is optimized for public cloud deployments, providing straightforward integration but limited on-premises capabilities. Both platforms maintain good customer service, though TeamCity users report occasional time zone issues. Buildkite users have access to thorough documentation and vibrant community forums.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity operates on a freemium model, offering a useful free tier but can become costly for scaling beyond initial offerings, posing a consideration for smaller businesses. Buildkite’s pricing, based on a per-user model, is cost-effective for large enterprises using containerization, although it may not suit smaller teams due to higher expenses. Each solution brings value in build efficiency and integration, with TeamCity supporting robust builds, while Buildkite excels in flexibility and deployment time savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Buildkite vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Buildkite

Ranking in Build Automation

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Buildkite is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 4.8%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamCity	4.8%
Buildkite	3.3%
Other	91.9%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Prabin Silwal

Senior Engineering Consultant at ASSURANCE IQ, INC.

Has an easy setup phase while also offering good documentation

The problem we are facing sometimes is that we have lots of unit testers, and we have to wait about ten minutes to complete all of those because we want to run or find a way. It's not directly due to the limitation of the tool as well, but when we are running the spec, we want to run those parallelly and decrease the downtime so that our deployment can be faster. I think that one is not possible only due to the it also depends upon the unit test framework as well we are using. When we tried with the multiple test cases in a parallel manner, there were some dependencies, and one over another kept failing. We make those sequential calls. The aforementioned area consists of the issues my company faced while using Buildkite.

Read full review

RubyGarg

IT Professional at NatWest Group

Versatile agent support boosts builds but UI and setup costs need refinement

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related to the version we were using. For instance, there were issues with agent specifications for particular build jobs and a timeout issue where jobs running longer than three hours would fail automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's flexibility with pipelines gave us a lot of advantages, especially when managing a huge amount of microservices."

"What I like best about Buildkite is its workflow management. You define YAML files to specify what needs to be done. The jobs can run based on a schedule, like a cron job, where you set it to run every night or every week. Additionally, you can set up triggers, such as new pushes to a repository."

"The documentation is quite helpful."

"If you join our team, it's very easy to learn Buildkite. We have our own boilerplate, so you can just clone it and add your configuration steps. Plus, we have documentation available to guide you through the process."

"You don't have to set up an agent in Buildkite like in Jenkins."

"Buildkite allows us to build automations and integration tasks effectively."

"It is a stable solution."

"Using Buildkite, it's much easier to manage pipelines. It's straightforward to understand what each pipeline returns, making it easy to edit configurations, such as passwords. Although there is a steep learning curve initially, the overall process is still comprehensible. Additionally, Buildkite offers features like hooks and triggers; for example, an action in the app can automatically trigger a pipeline. These elements can be added to specific pipelines, ensuring the entire process is automated."

More Buildkite pros

"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."

"Time to deployment has been reduced and it has helped in preventing us from deploying breaking changes into production."

"It is vital to our business to have quick and robust builds, and TeamCity is helping us to keep everything tidy and under control."

"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."

"I have used Jenkins, TFS, Cruise Control .net, and GO, and I switched from using Cruise Control .net as TeamCity is easier to use and displays important information very well, with great support for integrating to other products from JetBrains and other vendors such as Atlassian, JIRA, and Windows AD."

"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."

"The solution has been fantastic for our organization due to the fact that we do not need a designer having to build the product and we don't need to figure out how to deploy it either, creating improved efficiencies which have saved us time and expense."

"TeamCity is very stable, is easy to set up and maintain, and once everything is configured there is almost zero time needed to maintain it."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"There is a need for rework occasionally, and issues like syntax errors can occur multiple times, especially when manual changes are made in AWS or Amazon Connect that are not captured in the code."

"The solution should offer more options for installing an agent and give users the option of having a separate self-hosted or provisioned agent."

"Based on the load, the agents can be scaled up and scaled down, and while they are scaling up, sometimes they just get stuck."

"Since we were using Buildkite for the first time, we had a lot of difficulty understanding how it worked. We didn't find any documentation from third parties; only Buildkite provided documentation. As a result, we faced a steep learning curve. After some time, it became much easier to use. Initially, understanding certain features, like the R integration, was challenging."

"It gets very complex if you want the tool to scale automatically."

"BuildKite should follow some providers like GitHub Actions. They can offer a shared agent or cloud agent."

"The way Buildkite represents workflows can be challenging. It uses Directed Acyclic Graphs, and there's a trade-off between abstraction and understanding what goes wrong when something fails. When a layer of jobs breaks down, it can be difficult to identify the issue at first glance. Additionally, logging can be cumbersome. I prefer GitHub Workflows."

"Most of our projects involve both front-end and back-end development. We write the code and then create a file to set up our process, including specifying the tests we want to run. Before deploying to production, we need to install and configure certain things. We need something like Docker Pro, but I'm unsure about that. I'm familiar with the steps for using Buildkite for this process. We start by defining which tests to run."

More Buildkite cons

"I need some more graphical design."

"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."

"Occasionally issues deploying software using the tool due to configuration issues within the tool (mostly around powershell configuration)."

"For our system, it wasn't scalable due to storage issues."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

"I would like to see an improvement where TeamCity alerts us via email or another medium if there are discrepancies between the code in the staging environment and what has been deployed to production, such as missing updates."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses."

"I find Buildkite cost-effective as it has definitely increased my productivity, especially on the deployment side. It saved a lot of my time and improved data management because I can handle different environments myself now."

"For a business plan, it was 19 USD per month per user."

"Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features."

"I don't think the tool is expensive."

"The self-hosted option is pretty cheap."

"We used the solution’s free version."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Buildkite?

One area that needs improvement in Buildkite is the requirement for rework of the code. There can be syntax errors when running the Buildkite pipeline, especially if someone has made manual changes...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Buildkite?

I use Buildkite for deployment tasks related to building AMI images and deploying routing profile queues into Amazon Connect. This involves using Buildkite in conjunction with GitHub. We create fil...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Buildkite?

With two years of experience on Buildkite, I would recommend it to others due to its manageable pipeline and the support team available for big issues. I am satisfied with it, rating its stability ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamCity?

We use TeamCity for build configuration and pipeline creation, as well as for automation purposes. We provide working pipelines for different teams internally.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Buildkite

Compared 22% of the time

Jenkins vs Buildkite

Compared 11% of the time

CircleCI vs Buildkite

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs Buildkite

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Buildkite

Compared 3% of the time

More Buildkite Competitors

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Travis CI vs TeamCity

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs TeamCity

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite

September 2026

Download Buildkite product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

August 2026

Download TeamCity product report

Overview

Buildkite is a powerful CI/CD tool praised for its scalability and flexibility in automating and managing complex workflows across multiple platforms. Its integration capabilities with various systems and supports for secure, customizable environments enhance development efficiency and data privacy. The feedback highlights significant boosts in productivity and operational cost reduction, making Buildkite a strategic asset for businesses aiming to streamline development tasks and align with organizational goals.

Buildkite

TeamCity offers flexibility in creating build pipelines with cross-platform support, powerful plugins like Octopus Deploy, and integration with version control systems, providing a centralized automation solution for continuous integration and deployments.

TeamCity streamlines CI/CD processes by supporting cross-platform building and testing for .NET, Java, and Ruby on Rails. It integrates with GitHub for code management and enables build environments for C/C++ projects, ensuring automated builds, unit tests, and security scans run efficiently. While praised for its user-friendly interface and quick setup, challenges include complex setup steps for configurations, a less structured interface, and limited reporting features. Integration with Octopus Deploy and Bitbucket can be improved, and enhancements are needed in the REST API and .NET deployment.

What are the essential features of TeamCity?

Build Pipelines: Offers extensive flexibility in configuring and managing build pipelines.
Cross-Platform Support: Facilitates builds and tests across different platforms like Windows, Mac, and Android.
Powerful Plugins: Includes integrations such as Octopus Deploy for deployment processes.
Version Control Integration: Supports interaction with version control systems seamlessly.
Build Chains: Allows configuration of dependent build chains for improved process management.

What benefits should users expect?

Centralized Automation: Streamlines processes by integrating building, testing, and deployments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and setup, despite some structuring issues.
Flexible Scripting: Supports diverse scripting needs to cater to specific project requirements.
Scalability: Easily scales with triggers and templates, enhancing productivity.
Efficient Notification System: Provides timely alerts on build or test failures to users.

In sectors such as software development and IT consulting, TeamCity is implemented to automate CI/CD pipelines across diverse platforms, supporting development languages like Java and .NET. Companies leverage it to streamline deployment processes to cloud-based environments, enhancing efficiency and reducing manual intervention.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

September 2026

Free Report: Buildkite vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about Buildkite vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Buildkite vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.