Buildkite vs TeamCity comparison

Buildkite and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Buildkite is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while JetBrains is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Buildkite holds a 3.4% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Buildkite users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Buildkite

Read 14 Buildkite reviews

1,466 Views
1,451 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

3,059 Views
3,028 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Buildkite

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

TeamCity and Buildkite are leading tools in the CI/CD industry, each catering to different user preferences. Buildkite stands out for its simplicity and cloud-native capabilities, making it preferable for users seeking ease of setup and manageability, especially in cloud environments.

Features: TeamCity supports comprehensive configurations with features like build chains, cross-platform support, and an extensive plugin ecosystem, making it ideal for complex dependencies. It integrates seamlessly with various technologies. Buildkite is distinguished by its cloud-native operations, smooth functionality with AWS and Google Cloud, and the ability to manage builds using YAML files, offering efficient caching mechanisms for optimizing the build process.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could enhance its user experience by simplifying its setup process, as users find its configuration complex and challenging. Improved out-of-box solutions and better integration support are desired. Buildkite needs to address issues with scalability and user interface by improving logging, error identification, and expanding third-party documentation and plugin support. Enhanced auto-scaling and easier external service integration would also improve its flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers diverse deployment options, including private cloud and on-premises setups that cater to enterprise needs. In contrast, Buildkite is optimized for public cloud deployments, providing straightforward integration but limited on-premises capabilities. Both platforms maintain good customer service, though TeamCity users report occasional time zone issues. Buildkite users have access to thorough documentation and vibrant community forums.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity operates on a freemium model, offering a useful free tier but can become costly for scaling beyond initial offerings, posing a consideration for smaller businesses. Buildkite’s pricing, based on a per-user model, is cost-effective for large enterprises using containerization, although it may not suit smaller teams due to higher expenses. Each solution brings value in build efficiency and integration, with TeamCity supporting robust builds, while Buildkite excels in flexibility and deployment time savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Buildkite vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Buildkite

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Buildkite is 3.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Buildkite	3.4%
TeamCity	5.4%
Other	91.2%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Prabin Silwal

Senior Engineering Consultant at ASSURANCE IQ, INC.

Has an easy setup phase while also offering good documentation

The problem we are facing sometimes is that we have lots of unit testers, and we have to wait about ten minutes to complete all of those because we want to run or find a way. It's not directly due to the limitation of the tool as well, but when we are running the spec, we want to run those parallelly and decrease the downtime so that our deployment can be faster. I think that one is not possible only due to the it also depends upon the unit test framework as well we are using. When we tried with the multiple test cases in a parallel manner, there were some dependencies, and one over another kept failing. We make those sequential calls. The aforementioned area consists of the issues my company faced while using Buildkite.

Read full review

RubyGarg

IT Professional at NatWest Group

Versatile agent support boosts builds but UI and setup costs need refinement

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related to the version we were using. For instance, there were issues with agent specifications for particular build jobs and a timeout issue where jobs running longer than three hours would fail automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you join our team, it's very easy to learn Buildkite. We have our own boilerplate, so you can just clone it and add your configuration steps. Plus, we have documentation available to guide you through the process."

"Buildkite makes it easier to conduct deployment. When I merge a PR in Buildkite, it automatically starts the deployment process. It used to be challenging to shift code from the development branch to the testing branch because I had to follow up with multiple developers. Previously, I was dependent on the DevOps team and developers to handle deployments, but now it allows me to deploy the solutions myself.This has made it much easier for me to handle both non-production and production environments."

"You don't have to set up an agent in Buildkite like in Jenkins."

"Using Buildkite, it's much easier to manage pipelines. It's straightforward to understand what each pipeline returns, making it easy to edit configurations, such as passwords. Although there is a steep learning curve initially, the overall process is still comprehensible. Additionally, Buildkite offers features like hooks and triggers; for example, an action in the app can automatically trigger a pipeline. These elements can be added to specific pipelines, ensuring the entire process is automated."

"The tool is simple and has no learning curve. If you know YAML, you can master it. It is simple to learn."

"With two years of experience on Buildkite, I would recommend it to others due to its manageable pipeline and the support team available for big issues."

"What I like best about Buildkite is its workflow management. You define YAML files to specify what needs to be done. The jobs can run based on a schedule, like a cron job, where you set it to run every night or every week. Additionally, you can set up triggers, such as new pushes to a repository."

"Buildkite allows us to build automations and integration tasks effectively."

More Buildkite pros

"It was simple and easy to use, with great features which are always customizable."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."

"General ease of use, quick start up time, and the NUnit build runner are the most valuable features for us."

"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."

"Good visualization of builds Easy configuration Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"The solution has been fantastic for our organization due to the fact that we do not need a designer having to build the product and we don't need to figure out how to deploy it either, creating improved efficiencies which have saved us time and expense."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"The way Buildkite represents workflows can be challenging. It uses Directed Acyclic Graphs, and there's a trade-off between abstraction and understanding what goes wrong when something fails. When a layer of jobs breaks down, it can be difficult to identify the issue at first glance. Additionally, logging can be cumbersome. I prefer GitHub Workflows."

"BuildKite should follow some providers like GitHub Actions. They can offer a shared agent or cloud agent."

"There is a need for rework occasionally, and issues like syntax errors can occur multiple times, especially when manual changes are made in AWS or Amazon Connect that are not captured in the code."

"The product must provide better integration with other tools."

"The solution should offer more options for installing an agent and give users the option of having a separate self-hosted or provisioned agent."

"I would like to see some improvements in the hooks implementation."

"Since we were using Buildkite for the first time, we had a lot of difficulty understanding how it worked. We didn't find any documentation from third parties; only Buildkite provided documentation. As a result, we faced a steep learning curve. After some time, it became much easier to use. Initially, understanding certain features, like the R integration, was challenging."

More Buildkite cons

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate; they need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this was first attempted."

"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."

"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

"I need some more graphical design."

"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features."

"I don't think the tool is expensive."

"For a business plan, it was 19 USD per month per user."

"The self-hosted option is pretty cheap."

"The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses."

"We used the solution’s free version."

"I find Buildkite cost-effective as it has definitely increased my productivity, especially on the deployment side. It saved a lot of my time and improved data management because I can handle different environments myself now."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Newspaper

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Buildkite?

One area that needs improvement in Buildkite is the requirement for rework of the code. There can be syntax errors when running the Buildkite pipeline, especially if someone has made manual changes...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Buildkite?

I use Buildkite for deployment tasks related to building AMI images and deploying routing profile queues into Amazon Connect. This involves using Buildkite in conjunction with GitHub. We create fil...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Buildkite?

With two years of experience on Buildkite, I would recommend it to others due to its manageable pipeline and the support team available for big issues. I am satisfied with it, rating its stability ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamCity?

We use TeamCity for build configuration and pipeline creation, as well as for automation purposes. We provide working pipelines for different teams internally.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Buildkite

Compared 17% of the time

CircleCI vs Buildkite

Compared 10% of the time

Tekton vs Buildkite

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Buildkite

Compared 8% of the time

GNU Make vs Buildkite

Compared 4% of the time

More Buildkite Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 15% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Travis CI vs TeamCity

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite

May 2026

Download Buildkite product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

April 2026

Download TeamCity product report

Overview

Buildkite is a powerful CI/CD tool praised for its scalability and flexibility in automating and managing complex workflows across multiple platforms. Its integration capabilities with various systems and supports for secure, customizable environments enhance development efficiency and data privacy. The feedback highlights significant boosts in productivity and operational cost reduction, making Buildkite a strategic asset for businesses aiming to streamline development tasks and align with organizational goals.

Buildkite

TeamCity offers flexibility in creating build pipelines with cross-platform support, powerful plugins like Octopus Deploy, and integration with version control systems, providing a centralized automation solution for continuous integration and deployments.

TeamCity streamlines CI/CD processes by supporting cross-platform building and testing for .NET, Java, and Ruby on Rails. It integrates with GitHub for code management and enables build environments for C/C++ projects, ensuring automated builds, unit tests, and security scans run efficiently. While praised for its user-friendly interface and quick setup, challenges include complex setup steps for configurations, a less structured interface, and limited reporting features. Integration with Octopus Deploy and Bitbucket can be improved, and enhancements are needed in the REST API and .NET deployment.

What are the essential features of TeamCity?

Build Pipelines: Offers extensive flexibility in configuring and managing build pipelines.
Cross-Platform Support: Facilitates builds and tests across different platforms like Windows, Mac, and Android.
Powerful Plugins: Includes integrations such as Octopus Deploy for deployment processes.
Version Control Integration: Supports interaction with version control systems seamlessly.
Build Chains: Allows configuration of dependent build chains for improved process management.

What benefits should users expect?

Centralized Automation: Streamlines processes by integrating building, testing, and deployments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and setup, despite some structuring issues.
Flexible Scripting: Supports diverse scripting needs to cater to specific project requirements.
Scalability: Easily scales with triggers and templates, enhancing productivity.
Efficient Notification System: Provides timely alerts on build or test failures to users.

In sectors such as software development and IT consulting, TeamCity is implemented to automate CI/CD pipelines across diverse platforms, supporting development languages like Java and .NET. Companies leverage it to streamline deployment processes to cloud-based environments, enhancing efficiency and reducing manual intervention.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

April 2026

Free Report: Buildkite vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about Buildkite vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Buildkite vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.