CloudBees vs GitHub Actions comparison

CloudBees and GitHub are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. CloudBees holds a 1.9% mindshare in BA, compared to GitHub’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,386 Views
721 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Read 23 GitHub Actions reviews

2,950 Views
2,950 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudBees

GitHub Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

CloudBees and GitHub Actions compete in the continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) space. CloudBees appears to have the upper hand in features and customer support, whereas GitHub Actions is advantageous in cost and ease of use.

Features: CloudBees is noted for its scalability for large teams, advanced security, and cloud-native architecture. It also provides comprehensive deployment visibility and premium support. GitHub Actions excels in seamless integration within GitHub, automation capabilities, and ease of use in setting up CI/CD pipelines. Its diverse range of community actions and available services caters to various needs.

Room for Improvement: CloudBees needs faster pipeline deployments, a more intuitive user interface, and resolution of plugin dependency issues. It also faces infrastructure challenges. GitHub Actions could improve artifact management, debugging, and expand its programming language support. It requires better integration and automation features, despite its open-source nature which encourages flexibility and evolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBees offers quick support and flexible deployment across different environments but can be hindered by plugin upgrades and infrastructure setup complexities. GitHub Actions primarily serves public cloud environments with less direct support issues. The setup can be challenging due to its newness, but it benefits from integration ease within GitHub.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBees is costlier, offering significant ROI through its robust features and automation capabilities, suitable for larger organizations. GitHub Actions is more cost-effective, often free, with a low entry barrier. Additional enterprise features can lead to extra costs. CloudBees' higher fees are justified by its strategic benefits, while GitHub Actions offers more accessible pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (4th)

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Actions is 8.7%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub Actions	8.7%
CloudBees	1.9%
Other	89.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Has supported repository management and demonstrates potential in workflow flexibility

While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps. Given the evolving nature of technology, there are potential improvements GitHub Actions can focus on, including enhancing support and reliability to match its competitors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security audit product offered by CloudBees is particularly beneficial in automating audit processes, which reduces the time developers spend on audits."

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"Scalability largely depends on how the tool is set up within your infrastructure"

"It’s a very good tool for auditing your project pipelines as well."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

"CloudBees assists by automating tasks, previously done manually, in the pipeline setup."

"CloudBees updates its features frequently, so if we need something like SSL login, they enable it."

More CloudBees pros

"GitHub Actions is a beautiful tool that integrates smoothly with all major tools, reducing CI/CD work by 30% to 40%."

"It is easy to use, especially if you are accustomed to using GitHub."

"The level of automation achievable is really good. So, the custom workflow creation and Marketplace Actions improved our project's efficiency."

"The most valuable features of GitHub Actions include its seamless integration within GitHub, which simplifies the CI/CD pipeline setup. The scalability of using different types of runners—both public and private runners—enhances deployment flexibility."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"The most valuable feature of GitHub Actions is the ability to automate various tasks, such as backups and deployments, to ease the development workflow."

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"GitHub Actions provides workflows that allow for process automation, enabling operations such as build, deploy, and scale applications."

More GitHub Actions pros

Cons

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"Sometimes, there are performance issues, however, they may be due to our organization's configuration."

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

"It could improve the document upload process."

"To use the tool, you need to be familiar with the tool itself and with how it will be incorporated into the culture."

"There could be improvements in the ease of use."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

"To improve efficiency, they should focus on smoother label deployment."

More CloudBees cons

"Sometimes incremental steps should be taken during deployment instead of trying to execute all tasks simultaneously, particularly when dealing with AWS EKS clusters and Helm charts."

"There could be more integration options with different platforms."

"Switching between hosted and self-hosted agents can be a bit complex, as self-hosted agents need to be provisioned in platforms like Azure or AWS."

"In our company, procedures or rules need to be completed, which is not a problem with GitHub Actions but with our process."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

"The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited."

"Sometimes it is quite complex to commit code from our local system to the GitHub repository; creating a folder in GitHub can be tedious."

More GitHub Actions cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 10% of the time

CircleCI vs CloudBees

Compared 9% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Tekton vs GitHub Actions

Compared 22% of the time

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

January 2026

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

January 2026

Download GitHub Actions product report

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

December 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.