Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JetBrains IDEs vs Windsurf comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JetBrains IDEs
Ranking in IDE
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windsurf
Ranking in IDE
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (4th), AI Software Development (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IDE category, the mindshare of JetBrains IDEs is 8.2%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windsurf is 8.0%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IDE Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Windsurf8.0%
JetBrains IDEs8.2%
Other83.8%
IDE
 

Featured Reviews

Souhardyya Biswas - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Long-term coding has benefited from intuitive UI and tools but now needs lighter performance
I am using the code completion feature in IntelliJ, and it helps me with my development processes. I use advanced debugging tools. The advanced debugging tools are useful for resolving code issues. The integration with version controls is seamless. GitHub is what I use. For my professional role, I need to use GitHub Enterprise, and the way it is set up in my enterprise, it does not allow linking it with IntelliJ. That is where I am stuck using the CLI. GitHub itself has a very robust CLI, so I have no complaints there. For personal use, GitHub integrates really well with IntelliJ. The UI is pretty good and very intuitive. I actually use the new UI which IntelliJ provides, and that is very intuitive and good.
Rusira Sathnindu - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
AI coding agent has boosted daily commits and now speeds up complex feature delivery
Even though Windsurf has a good understanding of the codebase, sometimes when you ask it to do a complex task, it may complete it in the first try but may need improvements. When you prompt it again repeatedly, after the sixth or seventh prompt, it may start performing poorly. That is one of the key things I have noticed—its performance is not very consistent with continued prompts. Additionally, it sometimes hallucinates things. Although this previously happened a lot, it has improved, and now these checkers and linter functions ensure the code it writes is correct, reducing those hallucinations, but the performance inconsistency is still something I have noticed. The UI is good as it is basically a Visual Studio fork, so it has a good user interface. Moreover, every Visual Studio integration works here, so all of those are good. One of the main issues is the agent hallucinating and the generations not being good; those are two main points.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Having the complete development environment in Linux in the same way as in Windows is already the best."
"Good support for refactoring."
"Windsurf has positively impacted my organization in that writing code is very fast and easy."
"Previously, the development was very slow, and after using Windsurf, my development speed increased by 70 to 80 percent."
"Windsurf has positively impacted my organization by improving our code quality and reducing our development time."
"Windsurf has saved a lot of time, and productivity has gone up at least 200%."
"Windsurf has created a personal impact on my productivity, allowing me to typically meet deadlines in one week instead of two."
"Time saving is one of the significant benefits with Windsurf, as it has saved a substantial amount of time compared to previous methods, with a 25% time reduction in code generation and completion of projects."
"Windsurf has saved a lot of time, and productivity has gone up at least 200%."
"Windsurf has absolutely impacted my day-to-day work by making things faster, mainly through autocomplete."
 

Cons

"One of the most important things to improve is the consumption of resources, mainly memory."
"Sometimes, plugins (from third parties) are not updated."
"Windsurf is stable approximately 95% of the time, but there are occasional latency issues that occur."
"Sometimes, Windsurf is not able to develop the feature that we want and hallucinates a lot."
"I chose 7 out of 10 because I've used Cursor as well, and sometimes I feel Cursor hallucinates less compared to Windsurf."
"Windsurf can be improved in several ways, such as enhancing response times and better handling of massive codebases when dealing with over 100K plus files, along with improved security controls."
"I wish Windsurf would improve the free trial, as it is slow."
"The answers from Windsurf are not always accurate, and it is also a bit slow."
"Since using Windsurf, I notice more errors, but we deliver approximately twice as fast."
"Windsurf should definitely improve on the retrieval coverage side and multi-agent side, which Cloud Code and others have."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IDE solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JetBrains IDEs?
I have used solutions such as GitHub code scanning, WatchTower, and Dependabot, but I do not regularly use them. I have used Dependabot, but I do not regularly use it.
What is your primary use case for JetBrains IDEs?
I use JetBrains IDEs and Visual Studio in tandem. Within JetBrains IDEs, I use IntelliJ. IntelliJ and Visual Studio are what I use primarily. Developing code and writing code is the key use case fo...
What advice do you have for others considering JetBrains IDEs?
GitHub is what I am using for version control. Mostly with GitHub I am working for version control. One year back was the last time when I worked with Dependabot. I would absolutely use a plugin fo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windsurf?
I did not have to give any money for it, so it is fully free, which is the best. I did not incur setup costs.
What needs improvement with Windsurf?
Windsurf can be improved in several ways, such as enhancing response times and better handling of massive codebases when dealing with over 100K plus files, along with improved security controls. AI...
What is your primary use case for Windsurf?
My main use case for Windsurf is writing code with AI solutions and refactoring existing code. A quick specific example of a task or project where I have used Windsurf for writing or refactoring co...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Citi, Siemens, Salesforce, Twitter, HP, New York Times, Pintrest, Airbnb, Expedia, Samsung, Volkswagen, Wikipedia, NASA
Dell, Anduril, MongoDB, Zillow, Atlassian
Find out what your peers are saying about JetBrains IDEs vs. Windsurf and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.