JIRA Service Management vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL] comparison

Atlassian and OpenText are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Additionally, 93% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

JIRA Service Management

Read 90 JIRA Service Management reviews

8,557 Views
6,247 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Read 48 OpenText Service Manager [EOL] reviews

79% willing to recommend

JIRA Service Management

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] and JIRA Service Management are competing products in the IT service management field. Analysis suggests that JIRA Service Management has the upper hand due to its robust feature set and perceived value to cost ratio.

Features: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] offers comprehensive ITIL-aligned processes, customizable modules, and robust incident management. JIRA Service Management provides an agile collaborative workspace, integration capabilities, and real-time reporting tools, reflecting a modern approach adaptable to various workflows.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] could benefit from reducing its implementation complexity, enhancing cloud capabilities, and updating its user interface. JIRA Service Management could improve by simplifying advanced customization, enhancing offline capabilities, and expanding integrations beyond the Atlassian ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] may encounter lengthy deployment times due to complexity and need for extensive customization. JIRA Service Management offers a streamlined deployment with readily available support and extensive documentation, with an advantage in ease of onboarding due to its cloud-native approach.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Service Manager [EOL] may involve higher upfront costs and a longer timeline to realize ROI due to extensive customization needs. JIRA Service Management provides competitive pricing with quicker ROI, emphasizing flexibility and cost-effectiveness, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking value and agility.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Service Management (ITSM) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (2nd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Dirk Leitermann

Senior Consultant Project Management & Transition at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It does what it should, but it's quite outdated.

I rate Micro Focus Service Manager four out of 10. I wouldn't recommend it. I would suggest ServiceNow. There may be solutions better suited for smaller companies. There are always alternatives because the architecture isn't terribly complex. The architecture is the same across solutions, and everything is linked. There are no modules to be bought from some other company in the past and integrated. ServiceNow also its disadvantages, but if you compare it to Service Manager, I can safely say ServiceNow is the future and Service Manager is the past.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."

"This is the most complete and versatile enterprise task management product and issue tracker."

"JIRA is an excellent tool that can cater to multiple needs and purposes, and the fact that we can use it for multiple tasks alone makes it scalable and very good at what it does."

"It's a good experience."

"This solution has helped us a great deal in project management tracking and forecasting."

"With Jira Service Desk, the simplicity of setting up a quick form and getting the service desk running quickly is very helpful."

"Our service desk is completely automated using Jira for everyone in the organization."

"JIRA can really scale perfectly for our needs."

More JIRA Service Management pros

"The application's performance reached a completely different level; so it's quite fast."

"We can have all our requests and incidents registered in one system."

"It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."

"While the tool works, what makes it work better is I can make it do whatever they need; it's a completely customizable solution to fit with the specific needs of our organization and it does it really easily and really dependably."

"It gives us better understanding and control of service management."

"One of the big benefits that’s come out of this is a centralized view of all IT operations that really enable us to shift resources (people and money) in a real-time way to accomplish whatever we need."

"Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."

"It has an intuitive front end which allows us to roll out good customer end user experiences."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] pros

Cons

"JSM's ability to handle large volumes of emails isn't great."

"Integration could be improved."

"Include a split configuration in a layer part to allow cloud services to have almost full admin rights in SaaS."

"An improvement they could add is a better management dashboard."

"During the updates, when another version gets released, whatever I am tracking at that time gets lost and I have to type it all over again."

"We have tried exporting some of the test cases into Jira from Excel. The interface for that isn't very user-friendly."

"There should be some AI integrations now as AI is in the picture."

"Jira has different modules that can develop workflow for demand management and project management, but the solution is no out of the box and would require lots of customization."

More JIRA Service Management cons

"Stability was a major issue in older versions of the product."

"We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system."

"It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, it's not that good."

"On the downside, it cannot really operate in the cloud; but other than that, everything is good."

"The end-user experience is very key for me. At the moment, that's an area that the product's perhaps a bit weak."

"I don't see anything lacking."

"We still find ourselves wrapping customizations around it more than we would like, and we still find the upgrade path more costly and time consuming than we would hope."

"The greatest issue for us is to understand the roadmap. We want to know whether we should upgrade now or should we wait three months."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Costs are about $50 per user per year. JIRA is sold in user tiers of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 2000, 10,000, and unlimited users. It is bad when you have 51 users then the price is based on that 100 user tier. Users at 100 will be the most cost effective."

"JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."

"Right now, there are only two of us who are both agents on the help desk and developers. We might be on the free version because we're less than three agents or users. I'm looking at Zephyr tests, which have a $10 a month flat rate, so right now, it is $10 a month. There are lots of add-ons. They do a free version, a standard version, and a premium version. In the last company, we started on $50 a month. By the time I left, we were paying $4,500 a month. That was mainly because we had 100 users on Confluence. I bought an add-on for Jira software for which we had 10 users, and that was $5 per user per month. It was costing me $500 a month, whereas it should only be $50 a month. I don't know if licensing fee has changed. I'd like our whole company to use it, but the big problem is the licensing because the Confluence side is what is really useful, but if I add 30 users to Confluence and then buy an extension for Jira software, I've got to pay for 30 licenses, even though I've only got two users in Jira software. It is the one big disadvantage of cloud software. You always have to pay for the number of seats regardless of which product you are on. This will probably severely limit how many people would use it because I'm not going to start paying $10 per user per month for a Jira software add-on when there are only two people using it."

"Jira Service Management has affordable license fees. It's $12 a month per person."

"We have an annual license with JIRA Service Management, but it is billed monthly."

"The pricing is very competitive and I think that it is okay."

"Buying a software solution is only a half part of the solution (or even less). You need to optimize usage of the software by hiring professionals who will help you to make the most of the software, especially in the beginning."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."

"I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."

"HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."

"Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."

"The license is not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I also received support from JIRA support, making it a positive experience.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibility in API endpoints. Regarding JIRA Service Management's API and support, the ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 13% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

ServiceNow vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

SCSM vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Service Management (SMAX) vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise PSA vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

May 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

April 2026

Download OpenText Service Manager [EOL] product report

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager

Overview

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

OpenText

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

resultspositive, Globicon

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.